{"title":"不断发展的设计教学法:为社会正义拓宽通用设计","authors":"Victoria Lanteigne, T. Rider, P. Stratton","doi":"10.17831/enqarcc.v19i1.1135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Universal Design came into prominence as a successor to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), contributing to broader notions of accessibility beyond baseline codes and standards. Rooted in human factors research, Universal Design primarily centers on supporting human performance through the development of accessible and usable environments (Steinfeld and Maisel 2012, 95-96). As such, Universal Design pedagogies predominantly focus on enhancing environments for people with disabilities and aging populations (O Shea 2018, 721; Steinfeld and Maisel 2012, 49). However, some believe Universal Design is on the cusp of a paradigm shift to address broader aspects of social justice (Salmen 2012; Steinfeld and Maisel 2012, 159-160). This paper synthesizes existing literature to explore how current academic and practice-facing Universal Design pedagogies support the movement’s expansion to address social justice across demographic groups. Critical audiences for this work include architectural educators, students, researchers, policymakers, and building professionals interested in advancing the theory and practice of Universal Design. Recommendations from this work reposition Universal Design pedagogies as a pathway for creating more equitable and inclusive buildings, spaces, and communities that are truly designed for all. ","PeriodicalId":339072,"journal":{"name":"Enquiry The ARCC Journal for Architectural Research","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evolving Design Pedagogies: Broadening Universal Design for Social Justice\",\"authors\":\"Victoria Lanteigne, T. Rider, P. Stratton\",\"doi\":\"10.17831/enqarcc.v19i1.1135\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Universal Design came into prominence as a successor to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), contributing to broader notions of accessibility beyond baseline codes and standards. Rooted in human factors research, Universal Design primarily centers on supporting human performance through the development of accessible and usable environments (Steinfeld and Maisel 2012, 95-96). As such, Universal Design pedagogies predominantly focus on enhancing environments for people with disabilities and aging populations (O Shea 2018, 721; Steinfeld and Maisel 2012, 49). However, some believe Universal Design is on the cusp of a paradigm shift to address broader aspects of social justice (Salmen 2012; Steinfeld and Maisel 2012, 159-160). This paper synthesizes existing literature to explore how current academic and practice-facing Universal Design pedagogies support the movement’s expansion to address social justice across demographic groups. Critical audiences for this work include architectural educators, students, researchers, policymakers, and building professionals interested in advancing the theory and practice of Universal Design. Recommendations from this work reposition Universal Design pedagogies as a pathway for creating more equitable and inclusive buildings, spaces, and communities that are truly designed for all. \",\"PeriodicalId\":339072,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Enquiry The ARCC Journal for Architectural Research\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Enquiry The ARCC Journal for Architectural Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17831/enqarcc.v19i1.1135\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enquiry The ARCC Journal for Architectural Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17831/enqarcc.v19i1.1135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
通用设计作为《美国残疾人法案》(ADA)的继承者而变得突出,为超越基准代码和标准的更广泛的可访问性概念做出了贡献。通用设计植根于人的因素研究,主要侧重于通过开发可访问和可用的环境来支持人的绩效(Steinfeld and Maisel 2012, 95-96)。因此,通用设计教学法主要侧重于改善残疾人和老年人的环境(O Shea 2018, 721;Steinfeld and Maisel 2012, 49)。然而,一些人认为通用设计正处于解决社会正义更广泛方面的范式转变的风口浪尖(Salmen 2012;Steinfeld and Maisel 2012, 159-160)。本文综合现有文献,探讨当前面向学术和实践的通用设计教学法如何支持该运动的扩展,以解决跨人口群体的社会正义问题。这本书的主要读者包括建筑教育工作者、学生、研究人员、政策制定者和对推进通用设计理论和实践感兴趣的建筑专业人士。这项工作的建议将通用设计教学法重新定位为创造更加公平和包容的建筑、空间和社区的途径,这些建筑、空间和社区真正为所有人设计。
Evolving Design Pedagogies: Broadening Universal Design for Social Justice
Universal Design came into prominence as a successor to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), contributing to broader notions of accessibility beyond baseline codes and standards. Rooted in human factors research, Universal Design primarily centers on supporting human performance through the development of accessible and usable environments (Steinfeld and Maisel 2012, 95-96). As such, Universal Design pedagogies predominantly focus on enhancing environments for people with disabilities and aging populations (O Shea 2018, 721; Steinfeld and Maisel 2012, 49). However, some believe Universal Design is on the cusp of a paradigm shift to address broader aspects of social justice (Salmen 2012; Steinfeld and Maisel 2012, 159-160). This paper synthesizes existing literature to explore how current academic and practice-facing Universal Design pedagogies support the movement’s expansion to address social justice across demographic groups. Critical audiences for this work include architectural educators, students, researchers, policymakers, and building professionals interested in advancing the theory and practice of Universal Design. Recommendations from this work reposition Universal Design pedagogies as a pathway for creating more equitable and inclusive buildings, spaces, and communities that are truly designed for all.