评估用于预测学生成绩的深度顺序知识跟踪模型

Joel Mandlazi, Ashwini Jadhav, Ritesh Ajoodha
{"title":"评估用于预测学生成绩的深度顺序知识跟踪模型","authors":"Joel Mandlazi, Ashwini Jadhav, Ritesh Ajoodha","doi":"10.1109/CSDE53843.2021.9718405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the key priorities in all instructional environments is to ensure that students recognise their learning mechanisms and pathways. Knowledge Tracing (KT), the task of modelling student knowledge from their learning history, is an important problem in the field of Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIEd) and has numerous applications in the development of interactive and adaptive learning technologies. KT can be utilised to understand each student’s distinct learning style, particular needs, and ability levels. We trained and evaluated the performance of Knowledge Tracing models on the ASSISTments dataset and EdNet-KT1 dataset. This study revealed that deep learning models for knowledge tracing (Deep Knowledge Tracing (DKT), Dynamic Key-Value Memory Network (DKVMN), and Attentive Knowledge Tracing (AKT)) outperform the Markov process model (Bayesian Knowledge Tracing). We also observed that AKT and DKT go hand in hand with predicting whether or not the following question will be answered correctly or incorrectly by the student.","PeriodicalId":166950,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE Asia-Pacific Conference on Computer Science and Data Engineering (CSDE)","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating Deep Sequential Knowledge Tracing Models for Predicting Student Performance\",\"authors\":\"Joel Mandlazi, Ashwini Jadhav, Ritesh Ajoodha\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CSDE53843.2021.9718405\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One of the key priorities in all instructional environments is to ensure that students recognise their learning mechanisms and pathways. Knowledge Tracing (KT), the task of modelling student knowledge from their learning history, is an important problem in the field of Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIEd) and has numerous applications in the development of interactive and adaptive learning technologies. KT can be utilised to understand each student’s distinct learning style, particular needs, and ability levels. We trained and evaluated the performance of Knowledge Tracing models on the ASSISTments dataset and EdNet-KT1 dataset. This study revealed that deep learning models for knowledge tracing (Deep Knowledge Tracing (DKT), Dynamic Key-Value Memory Network (DKVMN), and Attentive Knowledge Tracing (AKT)) outperform the Markov process model (Bayesian Knowledge Tracing). We also observed that AKT and DKT go hand in hand with predicting whether or not the following question will be answered correctly or incorrectly by the student.\",\"PeriodicalId\":166950,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 IEEE Asia-Pacific Conference on Computer Science and Data Engineering (CSDE)\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 IEEE Asia-Pacific Conference on Computer Science and Data Engineering (CSDE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSDE53843.2021.9718405\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE Asia-Pacific Conference on Computer Science and Data Engineering (CSDE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSDE53843.2021.9718405","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在所有教学环境中,一个关键的优先事项是确保学生认识到他们的学习机制和途径。知识追踪(KT)是根据学生的学习历史对其知识进行建模的任务,是人工智能教育(AIEd)领域的一个重要问题,在交互式和自适应学习技术的开发中有着广泛的应用。KT可以用来了解每个学生独特的学习风格、特殊需求和能力水平。我们在ASSISTments数据集和EdNet-KT1数据集上训练并评估了知识跟踪模型的性能。研究发现,深度学习模型(deep knowledge tracing, DKT)、动态键值记忆网络(Dynamic Key-Value Memory Network, DKVMN)和专注知识跟踪(attention knowledge tracing, AKT)的性能优于马尔可夫过程模型(Bayesian knowledge tracing)。我们还观察到AKT和DKT与预测学生是否会正确或错误地回答以下问题密切相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating Deep Sequential Knowledge Tracing Models for Predicting Student Performance
One of the key priorities in all instructional environments is to ensure that students recognise their learning mechanisms and pathways. Knowledge Tracing (KT), the task of modelling student knowledge from their learning history, is an important problem in the field of Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIEd) and has numerous applications in the development of interactive and adaptive learning technologies. KT can be utilised to understand each student’s distinct learning style, particular needs, and ability levels. We trained and evaluated the performance of Knowledge Tracing models on the ASSISTments dataset and EdNet-KT1 dataset. This study revealed that deep learning models for knowledge tracing (Deep Knowledge Tracing (DKT), Dynamic Key-Value Memory Network (DKVMN), and Attentive Knowledge Tracing (AKT)) outperform the Markov process model (Bayesian Knowledge Tracing). We also observed that AKT and DKT go hand in hand with predicting whether or not the following question will be answered correctly or incorrectly by the student.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信