金融工具复杂会计核算的使用者观点

Rebecca Tan, G. Tower, P. Hancock, R. Taplin
{"title":"金融工具复杂会计核算的使用者观点","authors":"Rebecca Tan, G. Tower, P. Hancock, R. Taplin","doi":"10.19030/IBER.V4I12.3644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines Australian and Singaporean users’ views on fair value accounting for all financial instruments in financial institutions via a survey on various aspects of contention in this debate. Overall, users showed general support for fair value accounting for all financial instruments. In addition, the findings revealed that users will support fair value accounting so long as there is no perceived difference between the banking and trading books, fair values of non-traded financial instruments are reliable and volatility in earnings will not be misunderstood. It was also found that user experience increases the level of support for the proposed fair value accounting model. These results highlight actual user preferences with noticeable support for arguments from both sides of the debate (JWG and JWGBA) in this highly contentious and topical area of accounting for financial instruments.","PeriodicalId":406250,"journal":{"name":"International Business & Economics Research Journal","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"User Views On The Complex Accounting For Financial Instruments\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca Tan, G. Tower, P. Hancock, R. Taplin\",\"doi\":\"10.19030/IBER.V4I12.3644\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines Australian and Singaporean users’ views on fair value accounting for all financial instruments in financial institutions via a survey on various aspects of contention in this debate. Overall, users showed general support for fair value accounting for all financial instruments. In addition, the findings revealed that users will support fair value accounting so long as there is no perceived difference between the banking and trading books, fair values of non-traded financial instruments are reliable and volatility in earnings will not be misunderstood. It was also found that user experience increases the level of support for the proposed fair value accounting model. These results highlight actual user preferences with noticeable support for arguments from both sides of the debate (JWG and JWGBA) in this highly contentious and topical area of accounting for financial instruments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":406250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Business & Economics Research Journal\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Business & Economics Research Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19030/IBER.V4I12.3644\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Business & Economics Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19030/IBER.V4I12.3644","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文通过对这场辩论中争论的各个方面的调查,考察了澳大利亚和新加坡用户对金融机构中所有金融工具的公允价值会计的看法。总体而言,使用者普遍支持所有金融工具的公允价值会计。此外,调查结果显示,只要银行和交易账簿之间没有明显的差异,非交易金融工具的公允价值是可靠的,并且收益的波动性不会被误解,用户就会支持公允价值会计。研究还发现,用户体验增加了对建议的公允价值会计模型的支持程度。这些结果突出了实际的用户偏好,在这个高度争议和热门的金融工具会计领域,争论双方(JWG和JWGBA)的论点得到了明显的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
User Views On The Complex Accounting For Financial Instruments
This paper examines Australian and Singaporean users’ views on fair value accounting for all financial instruments in financial institutions via a survey on various aspects of contention in this debate. Overall, users showed general support for fair value accounting for all financial instruments. In addition, the findings revealed that users will support fair value accounting so long as there is no perceived difference between the banking and trading books, fair values of non-traded financial instruments are reliable and volatility in earnings will not be misunderstood. It was also found that user experience increases the level of support for the proposed fair value accounting model. These results highlight actual user preferences with noticeable support for arguments from both sides of the debate (JWG and JWGBA) in this highly contentious and topical area of accounting for financial instruments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信