胆总管结石患者最佳内镜治疗方案的选择

I. Sayfutdinov, D. M. Krasilnikov, L. Slavin, R. Khayrullin, R. T. Zimagulov, M. Panasyuk
{"title":"胆总管结石患者最佳内镜治疗方案的选择","authors":"I. Sayfutdinov, D. M. Krasilnikov, L. Slavin, R. Khayrullin, R. T. Zimagulov, M. Panasyuk","doi":"10.20969/vskm.2021.14(6).58-67","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. When using traditional endoscopic methods of choledocholithiasis treatment, the issues related to the remaining high risk of post manipulative complications remain unsolved. The priority task is the development of new methods of endoscopic treatment, which will prevent the development of postoperative complications. Aim. The aim of the study was to determine the optimal treatment option based on the comparative analysis of different ways of endoscopic interventions in patients with choledocholithiasis. Material and methods. The paper presents the outcomes of endoscopic interventions in 127 patients with choledocholithiasis. Of them 84 patients composed the main group in which choledocholithiasis treatment was performed according to the original method including two operative stages. On the first one we performed partial papillotomy, temporary stenting of common bile duct (in 100%) and main pancreatic duct (in 45%), and papillotomy over the stent to the muscular layer of Oddi sphincter. On the second one after 2–4 days the biliary stent was removed, lithoextraction was performed along with bile duct restenting. Pancreatic and biliary stents were removed after 24 hours and 3–8 weeks respectively. A comparison group was composed of 43 patients who underwent endoscopic surgeries by the classical well-known methods. Results and discussion. The analysis showed that the differences in the groups with classical method of choledocholithiasis endoscopic treatment (CMCLET) and original method of choledocholithiasis endoscopic treatment (OMCLET) between the levels of «Average number of surgeries per patient» (2,05 surgeries ranging from 1 to 4 for CMCLET versus 2,41 surgeries ranging from 2 to 5 for OMCLET; p=0,0176) and «Duration of hospitalization» (10,4 days to 8,95 days; p=0,0377), there was an inverse relationship between the number of surgeries and duration of hospitalization, which was largely due to different levels of the rate of early postoperative complications (p=0,0005). Twenty times higher blood amylase levels in the main group compared to the reference values did not lead to the development of acute pancreatitis, the incidence of which was 7 times lower in the comparison group (p=0,001). Conclusion. Comprehensive study of the outcomes of endoscopic treatment in patients with choledocholithiasis using different variants of interventions has shown convincing superiority of the original method of surgical aid.","PeriodicalId":110361,"journal":{"name":"The Bulletin of Contemporary Clinical Medicine","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SELECTION OF THE OPTIMAL ENDOSCOPIC TREATMENT OPTION FOR PATIENTS WITH CHOLEDOCHOLITHIASIS\",\"authors\":\"I. Sayfutdinov, D. M. Krasilnikov, L. Slavin, R. Khayrullin, R. T. Zimagulov, M. Panasyuk\",\"doi\":\"10.20969/vskm.2021.14(6).58-67\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. When using traditional endoscopic methods of choledocholithiasis treatment, the issues related to the remaining high risk of post manipulative complications remain unsolved. The priority task is the development of new methods of endoscopic treatment, which will prevent the development of postoperative complications. Aim. The aim of the study was to determine the optimal treatment option based on the comparative analysis of different ways of endoscopic interventions in patients with choledocholithiasis. Material and methods. The paper presents the outcomes of endoscopic interventions in 127 patients with choledocholithiasis. Of them 84 patients composed the main group in which choledocholithiasis treatment was performed according to the original method including two operative stages. On the first one we performed partial papillotomy, temporary stenting of common bile duct (in 100%) and main pancreatic duct (in 45%), and papillotomy over the stent to the muscular layer of Oddi sphincter. On the second one after 2–4 days the biliary stent was removed, lithoextraction was performed along with bile duct restenting. Pancreatic and biliary stents were removed after 24 hours and 3–8 weeks respectively. A comparison group was composed of 43 patients who underwent endoscopic surgeries by the classical well-known methods. Results and discussion. The analysis showed that the differences in the groups with classical method of choledocholithiasis endoscopic treatment (CMCLET) and original method of choledocholithiasis endoscopic treatment (OMCLET) between the levels of «Average number of surgeries per patient» (2,05 surgeries ranging from 1 to 4 for CMCLET versus 2,41 surgeries ranging from 2 to 5 for OMCLET; p=0,0176) and «Duration of hospitalization» (10,4 days to 8,95 days; p=0,0377), there was an inverse relationship between the number of surgeries and duration of hospitalization, which was largely due to different levels of the rate of early postoperative complications (p=0,0005). Twenty times higher blood amylase levels in the main group compared to the reference values did not lead to the development of acute pancreatitis, the incidence of which was 7 times lower in the comparison group (p=0,001). Conclusion. Comprehensive study of the outcomes of endoscopic treatment in patients with choledocholithiasis using different variants of interventions has shown convincing superiority of the original method of surgical aid.\",\"PeriodicalId\":110361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Bulletin of Contemporary Clinical Medicine\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Bulletin of Contemporary Clinical Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20969/vskm.2021.14(6).58-67\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Bulletin of Contemporary Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20969/vskm.2021.14(6).58-67","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍。在使用传统的内镜方法治疗胆总管结石时,与操作后并发症的高风险相关的问题仍未解决。当务之急是开发新的内镜治疗方法,防止术后并发症的发生。的目标。本研究的目的是在比较分析胆总管结石患者不同内镜干预方式的基础上,确定最佳治疗方案。材料和方法。本文报道127例胆总管结石患者的内镜干预结果。其中84例为主要组,按原方法治疗胆总管结石,分为两个手术阶段。在第一例中,我们进行了部分乳头切开术,胆总管(100%)和主胰管(45%)临时支架置入,并在支架上方进行了乳头切开术至Oddi括约肌肌肉层。第二次手术2-4天后取出胆道支架,行取石术并胆管置换术。胰腺和胆道支架分别于24小时和3-8周后取出。对照组由43例患者组成,他们采用经典的众所周知的方法进行内窥镜手术。结果和讨论。分析显示,经典胆总管内窥镜治疗方法(CMCLET)组与原始胆总管内窥镜治疗方法(OMCLET)组在“每例患者平均手术次数”水平上的差异(CMCLET为2,05例手术,范围为1至4例,OMCLET为2,41例手术,范围为2至5例;p= 0.0176)和"住院时间"(10.4天至8.95天;P =0,0377),手术次数与住院时间呈负相关,这主要是由于术后早期并发症发生率不同(P =0,0005)。与参考值相比,主组血清淀粉酶水平高20倍,但未导致急性胰腺炎的发生,其发病率比对照组低7倍(p= 0.001)。结论。综合研究内镜下治疗胆总管结石患者不同干预措施的效果,显示了原始手术辅助方法的令人信服的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
SELECTION OF THE OPTIMAL ENDOSCOPIC TREATMENT OPTION FOR PATIENTS WITH CHOLEDOCHOLITHIASIS
Introduction. When using traditional endoscopic methods of choledocholithiasis treatment, the issues related to the remaining high risk of post manipulative complications remain unsolved. The priority task is the development of new methods of endoscopic treatment, which will prevent the development of postoperative complications. Aim. The aim of the study was to determine the optimal treatment option based on the comparative analysis of different ways of endoscopic interventions in patients with choledocholithiasis. Material and methods. The paper presents the outcomes of endoscopic interventions in 127 patients with choledocholithiasis. Of them 84 patients composed the main group in which choledocholithiasis treatment was performed according to the original method including two operative stages. On the first one we performed partial papillotomy, temporary stenting of common bile duct (in 100%) and main pancreatic duct (in 45%), and papillotomy over the stent to the muscular layer of Oddi sphincter. On the second one after 2–4 days the biliary stent was removed, lithoextraction was performed along with bile duct restenting. Pancreatic and biliary stents were removed after 24 hours and 3–8 weeks respectively. A comparison group was composed of 43 patients who underwent endoscopic surgeries by the classical well-known methods. Results and discussion. The analysis showed that the differences in the groups with classical method of choledocholithiasis endoscopic treatment (CMCLET) and original method of choledocholithiasis endoscopic treatment (OMCLET) between the levels of «Average number of surgeries per patient» (2,05 surgeries ranging from 1 to 4 for CMCLET versus 2,41 surgeries ranging from 2 to 5 for OMCLET; p=0,0176) and «Duration of hospitalization» (10,4 days to 8,95 days; p=0,0377), there was an inverse relationship between the number of surgeries and duration of hospitalization, which was largely due to different levels of the rate of early postoperative complications (p=0,0005). Twenty times higher blood amylase levels in the main group compared to the reference values did not lead to the development of acute pancreatitis, the incidence of which was 7 times lower in the comparison group (p=0,001). Conclusion. Comprehensive study of the outcomes of endoscopic treatment in patients with choledocholithiasis using different variants of interventions has shown convincing superiority of the original method of surgical aid.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信