概率或卷积- lstm神经网络:冻融鱼片识别能力的比较研究

Wilson Castro-Silupu, Monica Saavedra-García, Himer Avila-George, Miguel De la Torre-Gomora, Adriano Bruno-Tech
{"title":"概率或卷积- lstm神经网络:冻融鱼片识别能力的比较研究","authors":"Wilson Castro-Silupu, Monica Saavedra-García, Himer Avila-George, Miguel De la Torre-Gomora, Adriano Bruno-Tech","doi":"10.1109/CIMPS57786.2022.10035684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The quality and safety of frozen-refrigerated hydro- biological products depend on the efficiency of the cold chain; therefore, there is growing interest in the discrimination of products subjected to inefficient cold chains, thus avoiding food poisoning and loss of products. For this purpose; computer vision systems coupled with chemometric tools, such as convolutional neural networks (CNN Convolutional Neural Network), have shown potential in discrimination tasks of three-band (RGB) ima­ges. Nevertheless; multi-band images, as hyperspectral images, require specialized convolutional networks such as those using LSTM (Large Short-Term Memory) layers. This paper compares radial-based artificial neural networks and LSTM convolutional networks for discrimination of fish fillets subject to freeze-thaw cycles. Fresh fish samples were filleted and subsequently potted to two freezing-thawing cycles (FTC). Then, hyperspectral images in the range of 400 to 1000 nm were acquired from fresh samples after each FTC. Subsequently, twenty spectral profiles of each of the fillets were extracted and pre-treated (smoothed); from these profiles, classification models were built using radial basis neural networks (RBNN - radial basis neuronal network) and CNN-LSTM. Finally, the metrics of each model were calculated, summarizing these in the value F-measure. The CNN-LSTM presented F-measure =3D 0.9075 ± 0.011, value relatively higher than the 0.8509 ± 0.003 of the RBNN. So, for discrimination of mackerel fillets subjected to different CCD, the CNN-LSTM shown to be better to the RBNN.","PeriodicalId":205829,"journal":{"name":"2022 11th International Conference On Software Process Improvement (CIMPS)","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Probabilistic or Convolutional-LSTM neuronal networks: a comparative study of discrimination capacity on frozen - thawed fish fillets\",\"authors\":\"Wilson Castro-Silupu, Monica Saavedra-García, Himer Avila-George, Miguel De la Torre-Gomora, Adriano Bruno-Tech\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CIMPS57786.2022.10035684\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The quality and safety of frozen-refrigerated hydro- biological products depend on the efficiency of the cold chain; therefore, there is growing interest in the discrimination of products subjected to inefficient cold chains, thus avoiding food poisoning and loss of products. For this purpose; computer vision systems coupled with chemometric tools, such as convolutional neural networks (CNN Convolutional Neural Network), have shown potential in discrimination tasks of three-band (RGB) ima­ges. Nevertheless; multi-band images, as hyperspectral images, require specialized convolutional networks such as those using LSTM (Large Short-Term Memory) layers. This paper compares radial-based artificial neural networks and LSTM convolutional networks for discrimination of fish fillets subject to freeze-thaw cycles. Fresh fish samples were filleted and subsequently potted to two freezing-thawing cycles (FTC). Then, hyperspectral images in the range of 400 to 1000 nm were acquired from fresh samples after each FTC. Subsequently, twenty spectral profiles of each of the fillets were extracted and pre-treated (smoothed); from these profiles, classification models were built using radial basis neural networks (RBNN - radial basis neuronal network) and CNN-LSTM. Finally, the metrics of each model were calculated, summarizing these in the value F-measure. The CNN-LSTM presented F-measure =3D 0.9075 ± 0.011, value relatively higher than the 0.8509 ± 0.003 of the RBNN. So, for discrimination of mackerel fillets subjected to different CCD, the CNN-LSTM shown to be better to the RBNN.\",\"PeriodicalId\":205829,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 11th International Conference On Software Process Improvement (CIMPS)\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 11th International Conference On Software Process Improvement (CIMPS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CIMPS57786.2022.10035684\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 11th International Conference On Software Process Improvement (CIMPS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CIMPS57786.2022.10035684","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

冷冻生物制品的质量和安全取决于冷链的效率;因此,人们越来越关注对低效率冷链的产品进行区分,从而避免食物中毒和产品损失。为此目的;计算机视觉系统与化学计量学工具相结合,如卷积神经网络(CNN卷积神经网络),在三波段(RGB)图像的识别任务中显示出潜力。不过;多波段图像,如高光谱图像,需要专门的卷积网络,如使用LSTM (Large Short-Term Memory)层的卷积网络。本文比较了基于径向的人工神经网络和LSTM卷积网络对冻融循环下鱼片的识别。新鲜的鱼样品被切成片,随后被装入两个冻融循环(FTC)。然后,在每次FTC后从新鲜样品中获取400 ~ 1000 nm范围内的高光谱图像。随后,提取每个圆角的20个光谱剖面并进行预处理(平滑);利用径向基神经网络(RBNN - radial basis neural network)和CNN-LSTM建立分类模型。最后,计算每个模型的指标,并将其总结为f值。CNN-LSTM的F-measure =3D为0.9075±0.011,相对高于RBNN的0.8509±0.003。因此,对于不同CCD下的鲭鱼鱼片的识别,CNN-LSTM优于RBNN。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Probabilistic or Convolutional-LSTM neuronal networks: a comparative study of discrimination capacity on frozen - thawed fish fillets
The quality and safety of frozen-refrigerated hydro- biological products depend on the efficiency of the cold chain; therefore, there is growing interest in the discrimination of products subjected to inefficient cold chains, thus avoiding food poisoning and loss of products. For this purpose; computer vision systems coupled with chemometric tools, such as convolutional neural networks (CNN Convolutional Neural Network), have shown potential in discrimination tasks of three-band (RGB) ima­ges. Nevertheless; multi-band images, as hyperspectral images, require specialized convolutional networks such as those using LSTM (Large Short-Term Memory) layers. This paper compares radial-based artificial neural networks and LSTM convolutional networks for discrimination of fish fillets subject to freeze-thaw cycles. Fresh fish samples were filleted and subsequently potted to two freezing-thawing cycles (FTC). Then, hyperspectral images in the range of 400 to 1000 nm were acquired from fresh samples after each FTC. Subsequently, twenty spectral profiles of each of the fillets were extracted and pre-treated (smoothed); from these profiles, classification models were built using radial basis neural networks (RBNN - radial basis neuronal network) and CNN-LSTM. Finally, the metrics of each model were calculated, summarizing these in the value F-measure. The CNN-LSTM presented F-measure =3D 0.9075 ± 0.011, value relatively higher than the 0.8509 ± 0.003 of the RBNN. So, for discrimination of mackerel fillets subjected to different CCD, the CNN-LSTM shown to be better to the RBNN.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信