土壤水分遥感估算方法综述与评价

Spie Reviews Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI:10.1117/1.3534910
A. Ahmed, Yun Zhang, S. Nichols
{"title":"土壤水分遥感估算方法综述与评价","authors":"A. Ahmed, Yun Zhang, S. Nichols","doi":"10.1117/1.3534910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Soil-moisture information plays an important role in disaster predictions, environmental \nmonitoring, and hydrological applications. A large number of research papers have \nintroduced a variety of methods to retrieve soil-moisture information from different types of \nremote sensing data, such as optical data or radar data. We evaluate the most robust methods for \nretrieving soil-moisture information of bare soil and vegetation-covered soil. We begin with an \nintroduction to the importance and challenges of soil-moisture information extraction and the \ndevelopment of soil-moisture retrieval methods. An overview of soil-moisture retrieval methods \nusing different remote sensing data is presented-either active or passive or a combination of \nboth active and passive remote sensing data. The results of the methods are compared, and \nthe advantages and limitations of each method are summarized. The comparison shows that \nusing a statistical method gives the best results among others in the group: a combination of \nboth active and passive sensing methods, reaching a 1.83% gravimetric soil moisture (%GSM) \nroot-mean-square error (RMSE) and a 96% correlation between the estimated and field soil \nmeasurements. In the group of active remote sensing methods, the best method is a backscatter \nempirical model, which gives a 2.32-1.81%GSM RMSE and a 95-97% correlation between the \nestimated and the field soil measurements. Finally, among the group of passive remote sensing \nmethods, a neural networks method gives the most desirable results: a 0.0937%GSM RMSE \nand a 100% correlation between the estimated and field soil measurements. Overall, the newly \ndeveloped neural networks method with passive remote sensing data achieves the best results \namong all the methods reviewed.","PeriodicalId":178733,"journal":{"name":"Spie Reviews","volume":"6 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"70","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Review and evaluation of remote sensing methods for soil-moisture estimation\",\"authors\":\"A. Ahmed, Yun Zhang, S. Nichols\",\"doi\":\"10.1117/1.3534910\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Soil-moisture information plays an important role in disaster predictions, environmental \\nmonitoring, and hydrological applications. A large number of research papers have \\nintroduced a variety of methods to retrieve soil-moisture information from different types of \\nremote sensing data, such as optical data or radar data. We evaluate the most robust methods for \\nretrieving soil-moisture information of bare soil and vegetation-covered soil. We begin with an \\nintroduction to the importance and challenges of soil-moisture information extraction and the \\ndevelopment of soil-moisture retrieval methods. An overview of soil-moisture retrieval methods \\nusing different remote sensing data is presented-either active or passive or a combination of \\nboth active and passive remote sensing data. The results of the methods are compared, and \\nthe advantages and limitations of each method are summarized. The comparison shows that \\nusing a statistical method gives the best results among others in the group: a combination of \\nboth active and passive sensing methods, reaching a 1.83% gravimetric soil moisture (%GSM) \\nroot-mean-square error (RMSE) and a 96% correlation between the estimated and field soil \\nmeasurements. In the group of active remote sensing methods, the best method is a backscatter \\nempirical model, which gives a 2.32-1.81%GSM RMSE and a 95-97% correlation between the \\nestimated and the field soil measurements. Finally, among the group of passive remote sensing \\nmethods, a neural networks method gives the most desirable results: a 0.0937%GSM RMSE \\nand a 100% correlation between the estimated and field soil measurements. Overall, the newly \\ndeveloped neural networks method with passive remote sensing data achieves the best results \\namong all the methods reviewed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":178733,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spie Reviews\",\"volume\":\"6 2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"70\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spie Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3534910\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spie Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3534910","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 70

摘要

土壤水分信息在灾害预测、环境监测和水文应用中发挥着重要作用。大量的研究论文介绍了从不同类型的遥感数据(如光学数据或雷达数据)中检索土壤水分信息的各种方法。我们评估了光秃秃土壤和植被覆盖土壤中最可靠的土壤水分信息检索方法。本文首先介绍了土壤水分信息提取的重要性和面临的挑战,以及土壤水分信息检索方法的发展。综述了利用不同遥感数据进行土壤水分反演的方法,包括主动遥感数据和被动遥感数据,以及主动遥感数据和被动遥感数据的结合。对各种方法的结果进行了比较,并总结了每种方法的优点和局限性。比较表明,采用统计方法获得的结果最好:主动式和被动式传感方法相结合,重力土壤湿度(%GSM)均方根误差(RMSE)达到1.83%,估计值与现场土壤测量值之间的相关性为96%。在主动式遥感方法组中,后向散射经验模型是最好的方法,其gsm均方根误差为2.32 ~ 1.81%,与现场土壤测量值的相关性为95 ~ 97%。最后,在被动式遥感方法中,神经网络方法获得了最理想的结果:gsm均方根误差为0.0937%,估算值与现场土壤测量值之间的相关性为100%。总的来说,新开发的基于被动遥感数据的神经网络方法在所有方法中取得了最好的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Review and evaluation of remote sensing methods for soil-moisture estimation
Soil-moisture information plays an important role in disaster predictions, environmental monitoring, and hydrological applications. A large number of research papers have introduced a variety of methods to retrieve soil-moisture information from different types of remote sensing data, such as optical data or radar data. We evaluate the most robust methods for retrieving soil-moisture information of bare soil and vegetation-covered soil. We begin with an introduction to the importance and challenges of soil-moisture information extraction and the development of soil-moisture retrieval methods. An overview of soil-moisture retrieval methods using different remote sensing data is presented-either active or passive or a combination of both active and passive remote sensing data. The results of the methods are compared, and the advantages and limitations of each method are summarized. The comparison shows that using a statistical method gives the best results among others in the group: a combination of both active and passive sensing methods, reaching a 1.83% gravimetric soil moisture (%GSM) root-mean-square error (RMSE) and a 96% correlation between the estimated and field soil measurements. In the group of active remote sensing methods, the best method is a backscatter empirical model, which gives a 2.32-1.81%GSM RMSE and a 95-97% correlation between the estimated and the field soil measurements. Finally, among the group of passive remote sensing methods, a neural networks method gives the most desirable results: a 0.0937%GSM RMSE and a 100% correlation between the estimated and field soil measurements. Overall, the newly developed neural networks method with passive remote sensing data achieves the best results among all the methods reviewed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信