基于指纹识别和信息融合的多模态生物特征识别系统

Liangyuan Chen
{"title":"基于指纹识别和信息融合的多模态生物特征识别系统","authors":"Liangyuan Chen","doi":"10.1109/ISCTT51595.2020.00024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Biometrics, physiological and/or behavioral traits used to distinguish different individuals, have now been widely used in authentication sites because they have shown advantage over passwords and token-based verification methods. However, biometric systems that use static and unimodal biometric information are susceptible to spoofing, which poses a security threat. Finger snapping, which is dynamic and can be collected multimodally, has the potential to overcome the current challenges, but a good information fusion method, model, as well as dataset is needed. In this study, three main questions are proposed and studied: (1) Is snapping a viable biometric? (2) Is feature-level information fusion of snapping practical? (3) How do traditional ML models and DL models differ in their performances on a snapping dataset? To answer the three questions, a preparative dataset consisting of kinetic information of snaps from 33 participants, as well as a main dataset consisting of kinetic and acoustic information of snaps from 50 participants have been built using a self-constructed data collection system. The preparative dataset is used to decide which subset of sensors provides the most useful information, and the main dataset is used to answer the above three questions. After testing, it is discovered that (1) snapping is a highly feasible biometric, (2) the kinetic and acoustic data can be fused at the feature level, and (3) The traditional ML model tested has greater potential over DL models due to the higher AUROC metric (0.967 ± 0.034 versus 0.943 ± 0.032), but has a lower weighted accuracy score with the default decision threshold than the DL model (87.5% ± 4.04% versus 89.9% ± 2.74%).","PeriodicalId":178054,"journal":{"name":"2020 5th International Conference on Information Science, Computer Technology and Transportation (ISCTT)","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Multimodal Biometric Recognition System based on Finger Snapping and Information Fusion\",\"authors\":\"Liangyuan Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISCTT51595.2020.00024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Biometrics, physiological and/or behavioral traits used to distinguish different individuals, have now been widely used in authentication sites because they have shown advantage over passwords and token-based verification methods. However, biometric systems that use static and unimodal biometric information are susceptible to spoofing, which poses a security threat. Finger snapping, which is dynamic and can be collected multimodally, has the potential to overcome the current challenges, but a good information fusion method, model, as well as dataset is needed. In this study, three main questions are proposed and studied: (1) Is snapping a viable biometric? (2) Is feature-level information fusion of snapping practical? (3) How do traditional ML models and DL models differ in their performances on a snapping dataset? To answer the three questions, a preparative dataset consisting of kinetic information of snaps from 33 participants, as well as a main dataset consisting of kinetic and acoustic information of snaps from 50 participants have been built using a self-constructed data collection system. The preparative dataset is used to decide which subset of sensors provides the most useful information, and the main dataset is used to answer the above three questions. After testing, it is discovered that (1) snapping is a highly feasible biometric, (2) the kinetic and acoustic data can be fused at the feature level, and (3) The traditional ML model tested has greater potential over DL models due to the higher AUROC metric (0.967 ± 0.034 versus 0.943 ± 0.032), but has a lower weighted accuracy score with the default decision threshold than the DL model (87.5% ± 4.04% versus 89.9% ± 2.74%).\",\"PeriodicalId\":178054,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 5th International Conference on Information Science, Computer Technology and Transportation (ISCTT)\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 5th International Conference on Information Science, Computer Technology and Transportation (ISCTT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCTT51595.2020.00024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 5th International Conference on Information Science, Computer Technology and Transportation (ISCTT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCTT51595.2020.00024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

生物识别技术,即用于区分不同个体的生理和/或行为特征,现已广泛应用于身份验证站点,因为它们比密码和基于令牌的验证方法更具优势。然而,使用静态和单峰生物特征信息的生物识别系统容易受到欺骗,这构成了安全威胁。手指敲击作为一种动态的、多模态的采集方式,具有克服当前挑战的潜力,但需要一种良好的信息融合方法、模型和数据集。在本研究中,提出并研究了三个主要问题:(1)捕捉是一种可行的生物识别技术吗?(2)抓拍的特征级信息融合是否可行?(3)传统ML模型和DL模型在抓取数据集上的性能有何不同?为了回答这三个问题,利用自建的数据采集系统,建立了由33名参与者的快照动力学信息组成的预备数据集,以及由50名参与者的快照动力学和声学信息组成的主数据集。准备数据集用于决定传感器的哪个子集提供最有用的信息,主数据集用于回答上述三个问题。经过测试,发现(1)声响是一种高度可行的生物特征,(2)动态和声学数据可以在特征层面融合,(3)传统ML模型由于AUROC指标更高(0.967±0.034比0.943±0.032)而比DL模型具有更大的潜力,但在默认决策阈值下的加权准确率得分低于DL模型(87.5%±4.04%比89.9%±2.74%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Multimodal Biometric Recognition System based on Finger Snapping and Information Fusion
Biometrics, physiological and/or behavioral traits used to distinguish different individuals, have now been widely used in authentication sites because they have shown advantage over passwords and token-based verification methods. However, biometric systems that use static and unimodal biometric information are susceptible to spoofing, which poses a security threat. Finger snapping, which is dynamic and can be collected multimodally, has the potential to overcome the current challenges, but a good information fusion method, model, as well as dataset is needed. In this study, three main questions are proposed and studied: (1) Is snapping a viable biometric? (2) Is feature-level information fusion of snapping practical? (3) How do traditional ML models and DL models differ in their performances on a snapping dataset? To answer the three questions, a preparative dataset consisting of kinetic information of snaps from 33 participants, as well as a main dataset consisting of kinetic and acoustic information of snaps from 50 participants have been built using a self-constructed data collection system. The preparative dataset is used to decide which subset of sensors provides the most useful information, and the main dataset is used to answer the above three questions. After testing, it is discovered that (1) snapping is a highly feasible biometric, (2) the kinetic and acoustic data can be fused at the feature level, and (3) The traditional ML model tested has greater potential over DL models due to the higher AUROC metric (0.967 ± 0.034 versus 0.943 ± 0.032), but has a lower weighted accuracy score with the default decision threshold than the DL model (87.5% ± 4.04% versus 89.9% ± 2.74%).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信