时代“站在变化的一边”吗?将GDPR纳入我们的(一些)研究实践

S. Duchesne, Maylis Ferry
{"title":"时代“站在变化的一边”吗?将GDPR纳入我们的(一些)研究实践","authors":"S. Duchesne, Maylis Ferry","doi":"10.1177/0759106321995709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) now serves as a framework for research, among other activities, when it involves collecting and using data which directly or indirectly allow the people in question to be identified. This therefore affects our research practice and, we believe, requires collective discussion. We suggest opening up the debate in this article by looking at what GDPR compliance means for our work in concrete terms, based on our own experience beginning a study on family transmission of banal nationalism (the ETPAF project). We also give an account of how, in our case, this new regulatory situation has afforded us the opportunity to add a (small) popular education dimension (or participatory science) to our work that was not part of the initial project and that we consider genuinely stimulating.","PeriodicalId":210053,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is Time ‘on the Side of Change’? Incorporating the GDPR in (some of) our Research Practices\",\"authors\":\"S. Duchesne, Maylis Ferry\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0759106321995709\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) now serves as a framework for research, among other activities, when it involves collecting and using data which directly or indirectly allow the people in question to be identified. This therefore affects our research practice and, we believe, requires collective discussion. We suggest opening up the debate in this article by looking at what GDPR compliance means for our work in concrete terms, based on our own experience beginning a study on family transmission of banal nationalism (the ETPAF project). We also give an account of how, in our case, this new regulatory situation has afforded us the opportunity to add a (small) popular education dimension (or participatory science) to our work that was not part of the initial project and that we consider genuinely stimulating.\",\"PeriodicalId\":210053,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0759106321995709\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0759106321995709","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

《通用数据保护条例》(GDPR)现在作为研究框架,在其他活动中,当它涉及收集和使用直接或间接允许识别相关人员的数据时。因此,这影响了我们的研究实践,我们认为这需要集体讨论。我们建议在本文中展开讨论,根据我们自己开始研究平庸民族主义的家庭传播(ETPAF项目)的经验,看看GDPR合规性对我们的工作具体意味着什么。我们还说明了,在我们的案例中,这种新的监管情况如何使我们有机会在我们的工作中添加(小的)大众教育维度(或参与性科学),这不是最初项目的一部分,我们认为这是真正令人兴奋的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is Time ‘on the Side of Change’? Incorporating the GDPR in (some of) our Research Practices
The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) now serves as a framework for research, among other activities, when it involves collecting and using data which directly or indirectly allow the people in question to be identified. This therefore affects our research practice and, we believe, requires collective discussion. We suggest opening up the debate in this article by looking at what GDPR compliance means for our work in concrete terms, based on our own experience beginning a study on family transmission of banal nationalism (the ETPAF project). We also give an account of how, in our case, this new regulatory situation has afforded us the opportunity to add a (small) popular education dimension (or participatory science) to our work that was not part of the initial project and that we consider genuinely stimulating.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信