在自动驾驶汽车中,预期接受利己主义与利他主义碰撞控制算法的年龄差异

Moritz Wischert-Zielke, Klemens Weigl, M. Steinhauser, A. Riener
{"title":"在自动驾驶汽车中,预期接受利己主义与利他主义碰撞控制算法的年龄差异","authors":"Moritz Wischert-Zielke, Klemens Weigl, M. Steinhauser, A. Riener","doi":"10.1145/3404983.3409992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents the results of an online questionnaire study (N = 97) which examined participants' anticipated acceptance of crash-control-algorithms (CCAs, i.e., algorithms aimed at effecting certain ethical accident outcomes). Concerning a self-sacrifice trolley dilemma, participants displayed a specific age-dependent pattern, in which both younger (18 -- 44 years) and older (65+ years) participants rated their acceptance for egoistic algorithms higher and for altruistic algorithms lower when compared to middle-aged participants (45 -- 64 years).","PeriodicalId":298769,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of Mensch und Computer 2020","volume":"111 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Age differences in the anticipated acceptance of egoistic versus altruistic crash-control-algorithms in automated vehicles\",\"authors\":\"Moritz Wischert-Zielke, Klemens Weigl, M. Steinhauser, A. Riener\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3404983.3409992\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents the results of an online questionnaire study (N = 97) which examined participants' anticipated acceptance of crash-control-algorithms (CCAs, i.e., algorithms aimed at effecting certain ethical accident outcomes). Concerning a self-sacrifice trolley dilemma, participants displayed a specific age-dependent pattern, in which both younger (18 -- 44 years) and older (65+ years) participants rated their acceptance for egoistic algorithms higher and for altruistic algorithms lower when compared to middle-aged participants (45 -- 64 years).\",\"PeriodicalId\":298769,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of Mensch und Computer 2020\",\"volume\":\"111 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of Mensch und Computer 2020\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3404983.3409992\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of Mensch und Computer 2020","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3404983.3409992","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文介绍了一项在线问卷研究(N = 97)的结果,该研究调查了参与者对碰撞控制算法(CCAs,即旨在影响某些道德事故结果的算法)的预期接受度。关于自我牺牲电车困境,参与者表现出一种特定的年龄依赖模式,与中年参与者(45 - 64岁)相比,年轻(18 - 44岁)和年长(65岁以上)的参与者对利己主义算法的接受度更高,对利他主义算法的接受度更低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Age differences in the anticipated acceptance of egoistic versus altruistic crash-control-algorithms in automated vehicles
This paper presents the results of an online questionnaire study (N = 97) which examined participants' anticipated acceptance of crash-control-algorithms (CCAs, i.e., algorithms aimed at effecting certain ethical accident outcomes). Concerning a self-sacrifice trolley dilemma, participants displayed a specific age-dependent pattern, in which both younger (18 -- 44 years) and older (65+ years) participants rated their acceptance for egoistic algorithms higher and for altruistic algorithms lower when compared to middle-aged participants (45 -- 64 years).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信