反浮选法对硅砂防水砂浆性能的影响

Okky Putri Prastuti, A. Septianingrum, Elisya Dianty Fatmala, U. Anggarini, T. E. Susanto, Nuvixca Dewi Milangsari
{"title":"反浮选法对硅砂防水砂浆性能的影响","authors":"Okky Putri Prastuti, A. Septianingrum, Elisya Dianty Fatmala, U. Anggarini, T. E. Susanto, Nuvixca Dewi Milangsari","doi":"10.17146/JSMI.2020.22.1.5991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"THE EFFECT OF REVERSE FLOTATION METHOD ON SILICA SAND AS WATERPROOFING MORTAR. Waterproof fabrication mortar cement by silica sand using reverse flotation silica (RFS) method was evaluated by waterproof absorption coefficient, compressive strength test, attractive test, and contact angle. RFS is used to replace waterproof agent and aggregate mortar to reduce cost. The aims of this experiment are to know the RFS process, the ratio between waterproof mortar cement with RFS and mortar, to determine performance and characteristic waterproof mortar cement. Methods used are prepared RFS, mortar cement fabrication, and testing (compressive strength, tensile strength, permeability, contact angle, XRF, FTIR, SEM, BET). Variable used are ratio cement/silica sand, concentrations of CaCl2, curing time, oleic acid, and sodium oleate addition. Optimum collector addition is obtained by oleic acid with compress strength 167.65 kg/cm2, tensile strength 0.16 MPa, permeability 4.6 cm, and contact angle 95°. Curing inside water effect and outside temperature give compress strength 167.65 kg/cm2 and 163.24 kg/cm2, permeability curing inside the water and outside temperature are 4.6 cm and 12 cm. Optimum CaCl2 addition is gained at CaCl2 1.8M with compress strength 64.29 kg/cm2, tensile strength 0.15 MPa, permeability 2.4 cm, contact angle 95°. Optimum ratio cement/RFS is 1:1 with compress strength 167.65 kg/cm2, tensile strength 0.16 MPa, permeability 4.6 cm, and contact angle 950.","PeriodicalId":365391,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Sains Materi Indonesia","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE EFFECT OF REVERSE FLOTATION METHOD ON SILICA SAND AS WATERPROOFING MORTAR\",\"authors\":\"Okky Putri Prastuti, A. Septianingrum, Elisya Dianty Fatmala, U. Anggarini, T. E. Susanto, Nuvixca Dewi Milangsari\",\"doi\":\"10.17146/JSMI.2020.22.1.5991\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"THE EFFECT OF REVERSE FLOTATION METHOD ON SILICA SAND AS WATERPROOFING MORTAR. Waterproof fabrication mortar cement by silica sand using reverse flotation silica (RFS) method was evaluated by waterproof absorption coefficient, compressive strength test, attractive test, and contact angle. RFS is used to replace waterproof agent and aggregate mortar to reduce cost. The aims of this experiment are to know the RFS process, the ratio between waterproof mortar cement with RFS and mortar, to determine performance and characteristic waterproof mortar cement. Methods used are prepared RFS, mortar cement fabrication, and testing (compressive strength, tensile strength, permeability, contact angle, XRF, FTIR, SEM, BET). Variable used are ratio cement/silica sand, concentrations of CaCl2, curing time, oleic acid, and sodium oleate addition. Optimum collector addition is obtained by oleic acid with compress strength 167.65 kg/cm2, tensile strength 0.16 MPa, permeability 4.6 cm, and contact angle 95°. Curing inside water effect and outside temperature give compress strength 167.65 kg/cm2 and 163.24 kg/cm2, permeability curing inside the water and outside temperature are 4.6 cm and 12 cm. Optimum CaCl2 addition is gained at CaCl2 1.8M with compress strength 64.29 kg/cm2, tensile strength 0.15 MPa, permeability 2.4 cm, contact angle 95°. Optimum ratio cement/RFS is 1:1 with compress strength 167.65 kg/cm2, tensile strength 0.16 MPa, permeability 4.6 cm, and contact angle 950.\",\"PeriodicalId\":365391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Sains Materi Indonesia\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Sains Materi Indonesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17146/JSMI.2020.22.1.5991\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Sains Materi Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17146/JSMI.2020.22.1.5991","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

反浮选法对硅砂防水砂浆性能的影响。采用反浮选法对硅砂防水砂浆水泥进行了防水吸收系数、抗压强度试验、吸引试验和接触角评价。采用RFS代替防水剂和骨料砂浆,降低成本。本实验的目的是了解RFS过程,水泥防水砂浆与RFS砂浆的配比,确定水泥防水砂浆的性能和特性。采用的方法有制备RFS、砂浆水泥制作、测试(抗压强度、抗拉强度、渗透性、接触角、XRF、FTIR、SEM、BET)。变量包括水泥/硅砂比、CaCl2浓度、养护时间、油酸和油酸钠添加量。最佳捕收剂为油酸,抗压强度为167.65 kg/cm2,抗拉强度为0.16 MPa,渗透率为4.6 cm,接触角为95°。内部水效应和外部温度固化的抗压强度分别为167.65 kg/cm2和163.24 kg/cm2,内部水效应和外部温度固化的渗透性分别为4.6 cm和12 cm。CaCl2添加量为1.8M时,压缩强度为64.29 kg/cm2,抗拉强度为0.15 MPa,渗透率为2.4 cm,接触角为95°。水泥与RFS的最佳配比为1:1,抗压强度167.65 kg/cm2,抗拉强度0.16 MPa,渗透率4.6 cm,接触角950。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
THE EFFECT OF REVERSE FLOTATION METHOD ON SILICA SAND AS WATERPROOFING MORTAR
THE EFFECT OF REVERSE FLOTATION METHOD ON SILICA SAND AS WATERPROOFING MORTAR. Waterproof fabrication mortar cement by silica sand using reverse flotation silica (RFS) method was evaluated by waterproof absorption coefficient, compressive strength test, attractive test, and contact angle. RFS is used to replace waterproof agent and aggregate mortar to reduce cost. The aims of this experiment are to know the RFS process, the ratio between waterproof mortar cement with RFS and mortar, to determine performance and characteristic waterproof mortar cement. Methods used are prepared RFS, mortar cement fabrication, and testing (compressive strength, tensile strength, permeability, contact angle, XRF, FTIR, SEM, BET). Variable used are ratio cement/silica sand, concentrations of CaCl2, curing time, oleic acid, and sodium oleate addition. Optimum collector addition is obtained by oleic acid with compress strength 167.65 kg/cm2, tensile strength 0.16 MPa, permeability 4.6 cm, and contact angle 95°. Curing inside water effect and outside temperature give compress strength 167.65 kg/cm2 and 163.24 kg/cm2, permeability curing inside the water and outside temperature are 4.6 cm and 12 cm. Optimum CaCl2 addition is gained at CaCl2 1.8M with compress strength 64.29 kg/cm2, tensile strength 0.15 MPa, permeability 2.4 cm, contact angle 95°. Optimum ratio cement/RFS is 1:1 with compress strength 167.65 kg/cm2, tensile strength 0.16 MPa, permeability 4.6 cm, and contact angle 950.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信