康复状态——爱丁堡康复状态量表(ERSS)、Barthel指数和脉冲剖面之间的关系

P G Mattison, R C Aitken, R J Prescott
{"title":"康复状态——爱丁堡康复状态量表(ERSS)、Barthel指数和脉冲剖面之间的关系","authors":"P G Mattison,&nbsp;R C Aitken,&nbsp;R J Prescott","doi":"10.3109/03790799109166269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A total of 364 patients attending day centres for the physically disabled had ERSS and Barthel scores recorded during the course of assessment. In addition, 100 of the patients had PULSES profile scores recorded. Correlation of total scores for all three scales confirmed that all three succeeded in measuring disability and all three were significantly related. There were, however, weak correlations between some of the individual subscales of each score, indicating that each of the assessment tools was measuring some dimensions of disability not adequately considered by the other scales. The results suggest that while progress is being made towards better measurement of disability and handicap, further refinement of these particular measurement tools is required.</p>","PeriodicalId":77547,"journal":{"name":"International disability studies","volume":"13 1","pages":"9-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/03790799109166269","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rehabilitation status--the relationship between the Edinburgh Rehabilitation Status Scale (ERSS), Barthel Index, and PULSES profile.\",\"authors\":\"P G Mattison,&nbsp;R C Aitken,&nbsp;R J Prescott\",\"doi\":\"10.3109/03790799109166269\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A total of 364 patients attending day centres for the physically disabled had ERSS and Barthel scores recorded during the course of assessment. In addition, 100 of the patients had PULSES profile scores recorded. Correlation of total scores for all three scales confirmed that all three succeeded in measuring disability and all three were significantly related. There were, however, weak correlations between some of the individual subscales of each score, indicating that each of the assessment tools was measuring some dimensions of disability not adequately considered by the other scales. The results suggest that while progress is being made towards better measurement of disability and handicap, further refinement of these particular measurement tools is required.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77547,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International disability studies\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"9-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/03790799109166269\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International disability studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3109/03790799109166269\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International disability studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/03790799109166269","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

在评估过程中,共有364名患者在身体残疾日托中心接受了ERSS和Barthel评分记录。此外,还记录了100名患者的脉冲谱评分。所有三个量表的总分的相关性证实了所有三个量表都成功地测量了残疾,并且所有三个量表都显着相关。然而,每个分数的个别子量表之间存在弱相关性,这表明每个评估工具都测量了其他量表未充分考虑到的残疾的某些方面。结果表明,虽然在更好地衡量残疾和障碍方面取得了进展,但需要进一步改进这些特定的衡量工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rehabilitation status--the relationship between the Edinburgh Rehabilitation Status Scale (ERSS), Barthel Index, and PULSES profile.

A total of 364 patients attending day centres for the physically disabled had ERSS and Barthel scores recorded during the course of assessment. In addition, 100 of the patients had PULSES profile scores recorded. Correlation of total scores for all three scales confirmed that all three succeeded in measuring disability and all three were significantly related. There were, however, weak correlations between some of the individual subscales of each score, indicating that each of the assessment tools was measuring some dimensions of disability not adequately considered by the other scales. The results suggest that while progress is being made towards better measurement of disability and handicap, further refinement of these particular measurement tools is required.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信