二次提名过程中的联想标志

N. Mykhalchuk, E. Ivashkevych
{"title":"二次提名过程中的联想标志","authors":"N. Mykhalchuk, E. Ivashkevych","doi":"10.25264/2519-2558-2023-17(85)-112-117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the article we’ve shown, that associations can be both individual and collective in their nature. In the first case they influence the use of any lexical unit by the individual. In the second case individual and collective associations determine the place of this or that lexical unit in the coordinate system of the English and Ukrainian languages as a whole. In this way, Extra-linguistic associations, by their very nature, are fixed in any language and become its facts. We indicate, that in Linguistics nouns of primary nomination are also defined as unmotivated terms; they are perceived by native speakers as some “primitive ones”. The way or motives of the formation of lexical units of primary nomination can only be determined through etymological or historical analysis. Thus, we paid a great attention in our research to the secondary nomination, the units of which are perceived as morphological or semantic derivatives of it. We showed, that the following concepts were closely related to the concept of secondary nomination: motivation, motivated, motivational sign (a motivator) and the internal forms of this word. Motiveness is understood as different characteristics of surrounding us word, which implies on the connection of sounds and structures of lexical units. In such a way the meaning of lexical units can be explained by the correlation of this word with mono-root and/or mono-structural forms of words. Motivation is defined as a process, which includes some internal form and its means of conveying signs or characteristics of the denotation of lexical units. So, we think, that motivation itself is the result of the word-forming act. The authors of the article consider motivation to be a kind of preverbal psychologized act, the purpose of which is to reflect some basic dominant features of the denotation of lexical units in the semantic space of the word. It is shown that the internal form of a linguistic sign is a predictable way of the explication in the semantic structure of the word’s extra-linguistic content, a motivational sign of it. In such a way the motivation of any lexical unit is the result of a nominative act, which reflects the motivational sign of the word’s denotation. It was proved, that qualifying interpretations of the object of designation were carried out, at the same time, through a sign, having been chosen by a social group, which also belongs not to a single object, but to a class of objects and, accordingly, represented a generalized and typified representation of a quality, property, characteristics of the designation object. We, in turn, adhere to the point of view that an equal sign can be placed between the most noticeable item that is marked and points out the main sign. Probably, we can talk about a certain subjectivity of associative features, which are taken into account as the basis for the formation of a new unit, at the stage of its appearing. We showed, that the main concept of the theory of word formation was the concept of a derived word, based on which we’ll describe the word formation system of a specific language and define its boundaries. So, we will consider derived words from the onomasiological aspect, from the point of view of how new names, new designations, new nominative signs arise, develop and functioned within the derived word.","PeriodicalId":237537,"journal":{"name":"Naukovì zapiski Nacìonalʹnogo unìversitetu «Ostrozʹka akademìâ». Serìâ «Fìlologìâ»","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ASSOCIATIVE SIGNS IN THE PROCESS OF SECONDARY NOMINATION\",\"authors\":\"N. Mykhalchuk, E. Ivashkevych\",\"doi\":\"10.25264/2519-2558-2023-17(85)-112-117\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the article we’ve shown, that associations can be both individual and collective in their nature. In the first case they influence the use of any lexical unit by the individual. In the second case individual and collective associations determine the place of this or that lexical unit in the coordinate system of the English and Ukrainian languages as a whole. In this way, Extra-linguistic associations, by their very nature, are fixed in any language and become its facts. We indicate, that in Linguistics nouns of primary nomination are also defined as unmotivated terms; they are perceived by native speakers as some “primitive ones”. The way or motives of the formation of lexical units of primary nomination can only be determined through etymological or historical analysis. Thus, we paid a great attention in our research to the secondary nomination, the units of which are perceived as morphological or semantic derivatives of it. We showed, that the following concepts were closely related to the concept of secondary nomination: motivation, motivated, motivational sign (a motivator) and the internal forms of this word. Motiveness is understood as different characteristics of surrounding us word, which implies on the connection of sounds and structures of lexical units. In such a way the meaning of lexical units can be explained by the correlation of this word with mono-root and/or mono-structural forms of words. Motivation is defined as a process, which includes some internal form and its means of conveying signs or characteristics of the denotation of lexical units. So, we think, that motivation itself is the result of the word-forming act. The authors of the article consider motivation to be a kind of preverbal psychologized act, the purpose of which is to reflect some basic dominant features of the denotation of lexical units in the semantic space of the word. It is shown that the internal form of a linguistic sign is a predictable way of the explication in the semantic structure of the word’s extra-linguistic content, a motivational sign of it. In such a way the motivation of any lexical unit is the result of a nominative act, which reflects the motivational sign of the word’s denotation. It was proved, that qualifying interpretations of the object of designation were carried out, at the same time, through a sign, having been chosen by a social group, which also belongs not to a single object, but to a class of objects and, accordingly, represented a generalized and typified representation of a quality, property, characteristics of the designation object. We, in turn, adhere to the point of view that an equal sign can be placed between the most noticeable item that is marked and points out the main sign. Probably, we can talk about a certain subjectivity of associative features, which are taken into account as the basis for the formation of a new unit, at the stage of its appearing. We showed, that the main concept of the theory of word formation was the concept of a derived word, based on which we’ll describe the word formation system of a specific language and define its boundaries. So, we will consider derived words from the onomasiological aspect, from the point of view of how new names, new designations, new nominative signs arise, develop and functioned within the derived word.\",\"PeriodicalId\":237537,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Naukovì zapiski Nacìonalʹnogo unìversitetu «Ostrozʹka akademìâ». Serìâ «Fìlologìâ»\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Naukovì zapiski Nacìonalʹnogo unìversitetu «Ostrozʹka akademìâ». Serìâ «Fìlologìâ»\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25264/2519-2558-2023-17(85)-112-117\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Naukovì zapiski Nacìonalʹnogo unìversitetu «Ostrozʹka akademìâ». Serìâ «Fìlologìâ»","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25264/2519-2558-2023-17(85)-112-117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇文章中,我们已经表明,联想在本质上可以是个体的,也可以是集体的。在第一种情况下,它们影响个人对任何词汇单位的使用。在第二种情况下,个人和集体的联系决定了这个或那个词汇单位在英语和乌克兰语的整体坐标系统中的位置。这样,语言外的联想,就其本质而言,在任何语言中都是固定的,并成为它的事实。我们指出,在语言学中,初级提名的名词也被定义为无动机名词;他们被以英语为母语的人认为是一些“原始语言”。初级提名的词汇单位形成的方式或动机只能通过词源学或历史分析来确定。因此,在我们的研究中,我们非常关注二次命名,其单位被认为是它的形态或语义衍生物。我们发现,以下概念与二次提名的概念密切相关:动机、被激励者、动机符号(一个激励者)和这个词的内部形式。动性被理解为周围词的不同特征,它暗示着语音和词汇单位结构的联系。通过这种方式,词汇单位的意义可以通过这个词与单根和/或单结构形式的词的相关性来解释。理据被定义为一个过程,它包含了某种内在形式及其传递符号或词汇单位外延特征的手段。所以,我们认为,动机本身就是构词行为的结果。本文认为动机是一种言语前的心理化行为,其目的是在词的语义空间中反映词汇单位外延的一些基本支配特征。语言符号的内在形式是对词的语言外内容的语义结构的一种可预测的解释方式,是词的语言外内容的动机符号。这样,任何词汇单位的理据都是指称行为的结果,它反映了词的外延的动机符号。事实证明,对指定对象的限定解释同时是通过一个由社会群体选择的符号来进行的,这个社会群体也不属于单一对象,而是属于一类对象,因此,它代表了对指定对象的品质、属性和特征的概括和类型化的表示。反过来,我们坚持这样的观点,即可以在最明显的标记项目之间放置等号,以指出主要符号。或许,我们可以谈论联想特征的某种主观性,它在新单位出现的阶段被考虑为形成新单位的基础。我们表明,构词法理论的主要概念是派生词的概念,在此基础上,我们将描述特定语言的构词法系统并定义其边界。因此,我们将从象形学的角度来考虑衍生词,从新名称,新名称,新指示符号如何在衍生词中产生,发展和发挥作用的角度来考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ASSOCIATIVE SIGNS IN THE PROCESS OF SECONDARY NOMINATION
In the article we’ve shown, that associations can be both individual and collective in their nature. In the first case they influence the use of any lexical unit by the individual. In the second case individual and collective associations determine the place of this or that lexical unit in the coordinate system of the English and Ukrainian languages as a whole. In this way, Extra-linguistic associations, by their very nature, are fixed in any language and become its facts. We indicate, that in Linguistics nouns of primary nomination are also defined as unmotivated terms; they are perceived by native speakers as some “primitive ones”. The way or motives of the formation of lexical units of primary nomination can only be determined through etymological or historical analysis. Thus, we paid a great attention in our research to the secondary nomination, the units of which are perceived as morphological or semantic derivatives of it. We showed, that the following concepts were closely related to the concept of secondary nomination: motivation, motivated, motivational sign (a motivator) and the internal forms of this word. Motiveness is understood as different characteristics of surrounding us word, which implies on the connection of sounds and structures of lexical units. In such a way the meaning of lexical units can be explained by the correlation of this word with mono-root and/or mono-structural forms of words. Motivation is defined as a process, which includes some internal form and its means of conveying signs or characteristics of the denotation of lexical units. So, we think, that motivation itself is the result of the word-forming act. The authors of the article consider motivation to be a kind of preverbal psychologized act, the purpose of which is to reflect some basic dominant features of the denotation of lexical units in the semantic space of the word. It is shown that the internal form of a linguistic sign is a predictable way of the explication in the semantic structure of the word’s extra-linguistic content, a motivational sign of it. In such a way the motivation of any lexical unit is the result of a nominative act, which reflects the motivational sign of the word’s denotation. It was proved, that qualifying interpretations of the object of designation were carried out, at the same time, through a sign, having been chosen by a social group, which also belongs not to a single object, but to a class of objects and, accordingly, represented a generalized and typified representation of a quality, property, characteristics of the designation object. We, in turn, adhere to the point of view that an equal sign can be placed between the most noticeable item that is marked and points out the main sign. Probably, we can talk about a certain subjectivity of associative features, which are taken into account as the basis for the formation of a new unit, at the stage of its appearing. We showed, that the main concept of the theory of word formation was the concept of a derived word, based on which we’ll describe the word formation system of a specific language and define its boundaries. So, we will consider derived words from the onomasiological aspect, from the point of view of how new names, new designations, new nominative signs arise, develop and functioned within the derived word.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信