2019年第02号国家课程指南:教育学课程的可能解散

Â. Portelinha, B. Borssoi, V. S. Sbardelotto
{"title":"2019年第02号国家课程指南:教育学课程的可能解散","authors":"Â. Portelinha, B. Borssoi, V. S. Sbardelotto","doi":"10.38117/2675-181x.formov2021.v3i1n5.92.113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aimed at analyzing the National Curriculum Guidelines for teachers’ initial training - (DCNFP) 2019, and make explicit conflicts and contradictions for their background in Pedagogy. It highlights the struggle of the educators' movement in order to define a national policy for training and valuing education professionals that does not dissociate teaching, management and research in the curricular area. Based on DCNFP/2019, it questions the indicative of fragmenting these dimensions in the formative-educational process of Pedagogy courses. According to the bibliographic and documentary researches, the study has shown that the Guidelines for the Pedagogy Course / 2006, crossed by epistemological antagonisms and controversies, resulted in a unitary perspective of background, reaffirmed in the DCNFP / 2015. In a political and economic context, with tax adjustments for social policies, the neoliberal offensive is intensifying, and, in this context, (DCNFP / 2019) are approved.","PeriodicalId":425330,"journal":{"name":"Formação em Movimento","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diretrizes curriculares nacionais n. 02 de 2019: A possível dissolução do curso de Pedagogia\",\"authors\":\"Â. Portelinha, B. Borssoi, V. S. Sbardelotto\",\"doi\":\"10.38117/2675-181x.formov2021.v3i1n5.92.113\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper aimed at analyzing the National Curriculum Guidelines for teachers’ initial training - (DCNFP) 2019, and make explicit conflicts and contradictions for their background in Pedagogy. It highlights the struggle of the educators' movement in order to define a national policy for training and valuing education professionals that does not dissociate teaching, management and research in the curricular area. Based on DCNFP/2019, it questions the indicative of fragmenting these dimensions in the formative-educational process of Pedagogy courses. According to the bibliographic and documentary researches, the study has shown that the Guidelines for the Pedagogy Course / 2006, crossed by epistemological antagonisms and controversies, resulted in a unitary perspective of background, reaffirmed in the DCNFP / 2015. In a political and economic context, with tax adjustments for social policies, the neoliberal offensive is intensifying, and, in this context, (DCNFP / 2019) are approved.\",\"PeriodicalId\":425330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Formação em Movimento\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Formação em Movimento\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.38117/2675-181x.formov2021.v3i1n5.92.113\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Formação em Movimento","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38117/2675-181x.formov2021.v3i1n5.92.113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在对《国家教师初训课程指南(DCNFP) 2019》进行分析,明确其教育学背景下的冲突与矛盾。它突出了教育工作者运动的斗争,目的是确定一项培训和评价教育专业人员的国家政策,该政策不将课程领域的教学、管理和研究分开。基于DCNFP/2019,它质疑在教育学课程的形成教育过程中分割这些维度的指示性。根据文献和文献研究,该研究表明,《2006年教育学课程指南》在认识论的对抗和争议中交叉,导致了背景的单一视角,在DCNFP / 2015中得到了重申。在政治和经济背景下,随着社会政策的税收调整,新自由主义攻势正在加剧,在这种背景下,(DCNFP / 2019)获得批准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diretrizes curriculares nacionais n. 02 de 2019: A possível dissolução do curso de Pedagogia
This paper aimed at analyzing the National Curriculum Guidelines for teachers’ initial training - (DCNFP) 2019, and make explicit conflicts and contradictions for their background in Pedagogy. It highlights the struggle of the educators' movement in order to define a national policy for training and valuing education professionals that does not dissociate teaching, management and research in the curricular area. Based on DCNFP/2019, it questions the indicative of fragmenting these dimensions in the formative-educational process of Pedagogy courses. According to the bibliographic and documentary researches, the study has shown that the Guidelines for the Pedagogy Course / 2006, crossed by epistemological antagonisms and controversies, resulted in a unitary perspective of background, reaffirmed in the DCNFP / 2015. In a political and economic context, with tax adjustments for social policies, the neoliberal offensive is intensifying, and, in this context, (DCNFP / 2019) are approved.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信