为什么欧洲不需要革命性的自动驾驶汽车规则

Alejandro Zornoza
{"title":"为什么欧洲不需要革命性的自动驾驶汽车规则","authors":"Alejandro Zornoza","doi":"10.23919/AEITAUTOMOTIVE50086.2020.9307418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper argues that the current liability regimes for damage caused by conventional vehicles continue to apply to damages caused by automated vehicles, and therefore there is no need for a new legal regime, contrary to the claims of other authors. Theories that seek to hold manufacturers and programmers liable for that damage, are also rejected, as is the debate on the morality of automated vehicles, as the author argues that the operator of the automated vehicle remains liable as a conventional driver, even if he does not drive in a conventional sense.","PeriodicalId":104806,"journal":{"name":"2020 AEIT International Conference of Electrical and Electronic Technologies for Automotive (AEIT AUTOMOTIVE)","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why Europe does not need revolutionary rules for automated vehicles\",\"authors\":\"Alejandro Zornoza\",\"doi\":\"10.23919/AEITAUTOMOTIVE50086.2020.9307418\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper argues that the current liability regimes for damage caused by conventional vehicles continue to apply to damages caused by automated vehicles, and therefore there is no need for a new legal regime, contrary to the claims of other authors. Theories that seek to hold manufacturers and programmers liable for that damage, are also rejected, as is the debate on the morality of automated vehicles, as the author argues that the operator of the automated vehicle remains liable as a conventional driver, even if he does not drive in a conventional sense.\",\"PeriodicalId\":104806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 AEIT International Conference of Electrical and Electronic Technologies for Automotive (AEIT AUTOMOTIVE)\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 AEIT International Conference of Electrical and Electronic Technologies for Automotive (AEIT AUTOMOTIVE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23919/AEITAUTOMOTIVE50086.2020.9307418\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 AEIT International Conference of Electrical and Electronic Technologies for Automotive (AEIT AUTOMOTIVE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/AEITAUTOMOTIVE50086.2020.9307418","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文认为,传统车辆造成的损害的现行责任制度继续适用于自动车辆造成的损害,因此没有必要建立新的法律制度,这与其他作者的主张相反。试图让制造商和程序员对这种损害负责的理论也被拒绝了,就像关于自动驾驶汽车的道德问题的辩论一样,作者认为,自动驾驶汽车的操作员仍然要像传统司机一样承担责任,即使他不是在传统意义上驾驶。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Why Europe does not need revolutionary rules for automated vehicles
This paper argues that the current liability regimes for damage caused by conventional vehicles continue to apply to damages caused by automated vehicles, and therefore there is no need for a new legal regime, contrary to the claims of other authors. Theories that seek to hold manufacturers and programmers liable for that damage, are also rejected, as is the debate on the morality of automated vehicles, as the author argues that the operator of the automated vehicle remains liable as a conventional driver, even if he does not drive in a conventional sense.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信