探索职业技术培训讲师对南非工作结合学习的看法

Joseph Mesuwini, K. L. Thaba-Nkadimene, D. Mzindle, C. Makwara
{"title":"探索职业技术培训讲师对南非工作结合学习的看法","authors":"Joseph Mesuwini, K. L. Thaba-Nkadimene, D. Mzindle, C. Makwara","doi":"10.7577/sjvd.4784","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis paper discusses the perceptions of Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) lecturers’ work-integrated learning (WIL) to determine how they understood their learning in a South African context. This study explored TVET lecturer perceptions about WIL, which is not reported as much in the literature. Eighteen lecturers from the civil, electrical and mechanical trades were involved in the study. A multiple case study design was adopted. The non-probability sampling design, specifically convenience and purposive sampling was used because participants were identified according to the researcher’s judgment. Qualitative data were gathered from TVET lecturers learning through WIL in industry. A thematic analysis model was used to search for common themes and analyse the data. Bergami and Schuller’s industry placement model underpinned the study. Using interviews and non-participant observation provided an opportunity for data triangulation, thereby addressing shortfalls that may be deep-rooted in a single method approach. This provided opportunities to test the trustworthiness and dependability of research findings. It emerged that TVET lecturers gained meaningful and current industry exposure. Lecturers described WIL as a positive and exciting initiative where they learnt from experts who shared valuable industry experiences. A few participants voiced their dissatisfaction over a lack of support from industry personnel. Further studies on challenges experienced by TVET lecturers during WIL are recommended. Overall, WIL complements theory with practice positively. The results may differ if future studies include other disciplines. WIL initiatives could influence different role players aligned to TVET provision.\n","PeriodicalId":352503,"journal":{"name":"Skandinavisk tidsskrift for yrker og profesjoner i utvikling","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring TVET lecturer perceptions about work-integrated learning in South Africa\",\"authors\":\"Joseph Mesuwini, K. L. Thaba-Nkadimene, D. Mzindle, C. Makwara\",\"doi\":\"10.7577/sjvd.4784\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nThis paper discusses the perceptions of Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) lecturers’ work-integrated learning (WIL) to determine how they understood their learning in a South African context. This study explored TVET lecturer perceptions about WIL, which is not reported as much in the literature. Eighteen lecturers from the civil, electrical and mechanical trades were involved in the study. A multiple case study design was adopted. The non-probability sampling design, specifically convenience and purposive sampling was used because participants were identified according to the researcher’s judgment. Qualitative data were gathered from TVET lecturers learning through WIL in industry. A thematic analysis model was used to search for common themes and analyse the data. Bergami and Schuller’s industry placement model underpinned the study. Using interviews and non-participant observation provided an opportunity for data triangulation, thereby addressing shortfalls that may be deep-rooted in a single method approach. This provided opportunities to test the trustworthiness and dependability of research findings. It emerged that TVET lecturers gained meaningful and current industry exposure. Lecturers described WIL as a positive and exciting initiative where they learnt from experts who shared valuable industry experiences. A few participants voiced their dissatisfaction over a lack of support from industry personnel. Further studies on challenges experienced by TVET lecturers during WIL are recommended. Overall, WIL complements theory with practice positively. The results may differ if future studies include other disciplines. WIL initiatives could influence different role players aligned to TVET provision.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":352503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Skandinavisk tidsskrift for yrker og profesjoner i utvikling\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Skandinavisk tidsskrift for yrker og profesjoner i utvikling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7577/sjvd.4784\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Skandinavisk tidsskrift for yrker og profesjoner i utvikling","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7577/sjvd.4784","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文讨论了职业技术教育与培训(TVET)讲师的工作整合学习(WIL)的看法,以确定他们如何理解他们在南非背景下的学习。本研究探讨了TVET讲师对WIL的看法,这在文献中并没有太多的报道。来自土木、电气和机械行业的18位讲师参与了这项研究。采用多案例研究设计。采用非概率抽样设计,即便利性和目的性抽样,因为参与者是根据研究者的判断来确定的。定性数据收集自职业技术教育讲师在工业中通过工学结合学习。使用主题分析模型搜索共同主题并对数据进行分析。贝加米和舒勒的行业安置模型是这项研究的基础。使用访谈和非参与性观察为数据三角测量提供了机会,从而解决了单一方法可能根深蒂固的不足。这为测试研究结果的可信度和可靠性提供了机会。由此可见,技职教育讲师获得了有意义的、最新的行业曝光。讲师们认为工学结合是一个积极和令人兴奋的倡议,他们向专家们学习,分享了宝贵的行业经验。少数嘉宾对缺乏业界人士的支持表示不满。建议进一步研究TVET讲师在WIL期间遇到的挑战。总的来说,工学结合是理论与实践的积极补充。如果未来的研究包括其他学科,结果可能会有所不同。WIL倡议可以影响与职业技术教育提供一致的不同角色参与者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring TVET lecturer perceptions about work-integrated learning in South Africa
This paper discusses the perceptions of Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) lecturers’ work-integrated learning (WIL) to determine how they understood their learning in a South African context. This study explored TVET lecturer perceptions about WIL, which is not reported as much in the literature. Eighteen lecturers from the civil, electrical and mechanical trades were involved in the study. A multiple case study design was adopted. The non-probability sampling design, specifically convenience and purposive sampling was used because participants were identified according to the researcher’s judgment. Qualitative data were gathered from TVET lecturers learning through WIL in industry. A thematic analysis model was used to search for common themes and analyse the data. Bergami and Schuller’s industry placement model underpinned the study. Using interviews and non-participant observation provided an opportunity for data triangulation, thereby addressing shortfalls that may be deep-rooted in a single method approach. This provided opportunities to test the trustworthiness and dependability of research findings. It emerged that TVET lecturers gained meaningful and current industry exposure. Lecturers described WIL as a positive and exciting initiative where they learnt from experts who shared valuable industry experiences. A few participants voiced their dissatisfaction over a lack of support from industry personnel. Further studies on challenges experienced by TVET lecturers during WIL are recommended. Overall, WIL complements theory with practice positively. The results may differ if future studies include other disciplines. WIL initiatives could influence different role players aligned to TVET provision.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信