压力分布对弹性成像影响的估计

T. Matsumura, R. Shinomura, T. Mitake, H. Kanda, M. Yamakawa, T. Shiina
{"title":"压力分布对弹性成像影响的估计","authors":"T. Matsumura, R. Shinomura, T. Mitake, H. Kanda, M. Yamakawa, T. Shiina","doi":"10.1109/ULTSYM.2005.1603207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We have already proposed the real-time strain imaging techniques (ca. 12 fps) for stable diagnosis in freehand and image classification method for the breast tissue diagnosis. For the objective diagnosis, most important problem is come from the fact that the strain image patterns were strongly depending on the magnitude and uniformity of the compression. In this paper, we investigate the pressure-distribution effects on the elasticity imaging using the tissue-mimicking elastography phantoms. We prepared 5 types of elastography phantoms with different stiffness. Phantoms #1-#3 have uniform stiffness overall in the rectangular solids and #4-#5 include small rectangular solids with different stiffness from surroundings. The phantom stiffness was estimated from the distribution of pressure and induced strain using our elasticity imaging system as follows. (1) The Young's moduli of first three phantoms were estimated as 6±1 kPa, 27±4 kPa, and 108±23 kPa, respectively. (2) In the case of phantoms #4 and #5, outer parts were estimated as 6±1 kPa and 8±2 kPa, and inclusion parts were measured as 12±1 kPa and 58±14 kPa, respectively. (3) For the special case of above phantom #1, we applied non-uniform pressure (3 times difference between each lateral limits). Even in that case, we successfully reduced the effect of non-uniformity from 235 % to 5 % in elasticity imaging.","PeriodicalId":302030,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2005.","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimation of pressure-distribution effects upon elasticity imaging\",\"authors\":\"T. Matsumura, R. Shinomura, T. Mitake, H. Kanda, M. Yamakawa, T. Shiina\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ULTSYM.2005.1603207\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We have already proposed the real-time strain imaging techniques (ca. 12 fps) for stable diagnosis in freehand and image classification method for the breast tissue diagnosis. For the objective diagnosis, most important problem is come from the fact that the strain image patterns were strongly depending on the magnitude and uniformity of the compression. In this paper, we investigate the pressure-distribution effects on the elasticity imaging using the tissue-mimicking elastography phantoms. We prepared 5 types of elastography phantoms with different stiffness. Phantoms #1-#3 have uniform stiffness overall in the rectangular solids and #4-#5 include small rectangular solids with different stiffness from surroundings. The phantom stiffness was estimated from the distribution of pressure and induced strain using our elasticity imaging system as follows. (1) The Young's moduli of first three phantoms were estimated as 6±1 kPa, 27±4 kPa, and 108±23 kPa, respectively. (2) In the case of phantoms #4 and #5, outer parts were estimated as 6±1 kPa and 8±2 kPa, and inclusion parts were measured as 12±1 kPa and 58±14 kPa, respectively. (3) For the special case of above phantom #1, we applied non-uniform pressure (3 times difference between each lateral limits). Even in that case, we successfully reduced the effect of non-uniformity from 235 % to 5 % in elasticity imaging.\",\"PeriodicalId\":302030,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2005.\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2005.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ULTSYM.2005.1603207\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2005.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ULTSYM.2005.1603207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

我们已经提出了用于手绘稳定诊断的实时应变成像技术(约12fps)和用于乳腺组织诊断的图像分类方法。对于客观诊断,最重要的问题是来自这一事实,应变图像模式强烈依赖于压缩的大小和均匀性。在本文中,我们研究了压力分布对模拟组织弹性成像的影响。我们制备了5种不同刚度的弹性印模。幻影#1-#3在矩形实体中具有统一的整体刚度,而#4-#5包含与周围环境刚度不同的小矩形实体。利用我们的弹性成像系统,从压力和诱导应变的分布估计了模体刚度。(1)前三种模态的杨氏模量分别为6±1 kPa、27±4 kPa和108±23 kPa。(2)幻影4号和幻影5号的外部部分分别为6±1 kPa和8±2 kPa,内含部分分别为12±1 kPa和58±14 kPa。(3)对于上述幻像#1的特殊情况,我们施加非均匀压力(每个侧位差的3倍)。即使在这种情况下,我们也成功地将弹性成像中不均匀性的影响从235%降低到5%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Estimation of pressure-distribution effects upon elasticity imaging
We have already proposed the real-time strain imaging techniques (ca. 12 fps) for stable diagnosis in freehand and image classification method for the breast tissue diagnosis. For the objective diagnosis, most important problem is come from the fact that the strain image patterns were strongly depending on the magnitude and uniformity of the compression. In this paper, we investigate the pressure-distribution effects on the elasticity imaging using the tissue-mimicking elastography phantoms. We prepared 5 types of elastography phantoms with different stiffness. Phantoms #1-#3 have uniform stiffness overall in the rectangular solids and #4-#5 include small rectangular solids with different stiffness from surroundings. The phantom stiffness was estimated from the distribution of pressure and induced strain using our elasticity imaging system as follows. (1) The Young's moduli of first three phantoms were estimated as 6±1 kPa, 27±4 kPa, and 108±23 kPa, respectively. (2) In the case of phantoms #4 and #5, outer parts were estimated as 6±1 kPa and 8±2 kPa, and inclusion parts were measured as 12±1 kPa and 58±14 kPa, respectively. (3) For the special case of above phantom #1, we applied non-uniform pressure (3 times difference between each lateral limits). Even in that case, we successfully reduced the effect of non-uniformity from 235 % to 5 % in elasticity imaging.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信