{"title":"关于生存数据一致性指数的概括说明","authors":"N. Kejžar, J. Stare","doi":"10.51936/atez3037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Concordance index (c-index) was adapted to survival data by Harrell (1982). In its basic form, the index depends on censoring, however the issue can be effectively dealt with. More importantly, Harrell's c-index cannot be used with time-varying effects and/or time-dependent covariates, and several generalisations were proposed. We look at some of them, explore their differences, point to a basic difference between these generalisations, and strongly favour one type of generalisation.","PeriodicalId":242585,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Methodology and Statistics","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"note on generalisations of the concordance index for survival data\",\"authors\":\"N. Kejžar, J. Stare\",\"doi\":\"10.51936/atez3037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Concordance index (c-index) was adapted to survival data by Harrell (1982). In its basic form, the index depends on censoring, however the issue can be effectively dealt with. More importantly, Harrell's c-index cannot be used with time-varying effects and/or time-dependent covariates, and several generalisations were proposed. We look at some of them, explore their differences, point to a basic difference between these generalisations, and strongly favour one type of generalisation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":242585,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Methodology and Statistics\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Methodology and Statistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51936/atez3037\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Methodology and Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51936/atez3037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
note on generalisations of the concordance index for survival data
Concordance index (c-index) was adapted to survival data by Harrell (1982). In its basic form, the index depends on censoring, however the issue can be effectively dealt with. More importantly, Harrell's c-index cannot be used with time-varying effects and/or time-dependent covariates, and several generalisations were proposed. We look at some of them, explore their differences, point to a basic difference between these generalisations, and strongly favour one type of generalisation.