极端情况下的地方广播

W. Kenneth Ferree
{"title":"极端情况下的地方广播","authors":"W. Kenneth Ferree","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1124037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A piece of legislation recently introduced by Representatives Anna Eshoo (D-CA 14th) and Tammy Baldwin (D-WI 2nd) that they call the \"Broadcast Licensing in the Public Interest Act\" (HR 4882), might deserve a better appellation as the \"Eradication of Broadcasting Act.\" At the heart of HR 4882 is a desire that broadcasters carry more of the content Representatives Eshoo and Baldwin favor: local public affairs programming and political coverage. In their view, the public interest is served by such programming and not by other fare that is more popular with viewers. The bill would also make broadcast license renewals conditioned on a showing of, among other things, a dedication to local news gathering [and] local production of programming. In actuality HR 4882 threatens to choke off the resources available for local broadcast service in medium and larger markets. By requiring broadcasters to ignore market demands and instead carry programming to meet political demands, HR 4882 would enervate local broadcasters and undermine the very thing it purports to promote - local broadcast service. The goal of re-energizing and revitalizing local commercial broadcast service, if it ever is to be realized, will come only when Congress removes the shackles that bind broadcasters' ability to respond to new competitive pressures.","PeriodicalId":413544,"journal":{"name":"Public Choice (Topic)","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Local Broadcasting in Extremis\",\"authors\":\"W. Kenneth Ferree\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.1124037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A piece of legislation recently introduced by Representatives Anna Eshoo (D-CA 14th) and Tammy Baldwin (D-WI 2nd) that they call the \\\"Broadcast Licensing in the Public Interest Act\\\" (HR 4882), might deserve a better appellation as the \\\"Eradication of Broadcasting Act.\\\" At the heart of HR 4882 is a desire that broadcasters carry more of the content Representatives Eshoo and Baldwin favor: local public affairs programming and political coverage. In their view, the public interest is served by such programming and not by other fare that is more popular with viewers. The bill would also make broadcast license renewals conditioned on a showing of, among other things, a dedication to local news gathering [and] local production of programming. In actuality HR 4882 threatens to choke off the resources available for local broadcast service in medium and larger markets. By requiring broadcasters to ignore market demands and instead carry programming to meet political demands, HR 4882 would enervate local broadcasters and undermine the very thing it purports to promote - local broadcast service. The goal of re-energizing and revitalizing local commercial broadcast service, if it ever is to be realized, will come only when Congress removes the shackles that bind broadcasters' ability to respond to new competitive pressures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":413544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Choice (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Choice (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1124037\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Choice (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1124037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

众议员Anna Eshoo(加利福尼亚州第14位民主党人)和Tammy Baldwin(加利福尼亚州第2位民主党人)最近提出了一项立法,他们称之为“公共利益广播许可法案”(HR 4882),也许更应该被称为“根除广播法案”。HR 4882法案的核心是希望广播公司播放更多代表艾舒和鲍德温喜欢的内容:地方公共事务节目和政治报道。在他们看来,这样的节目服务于公众利益,而不是其他更受观众欢迎的节目。该法案还规定,广播执照的续期,除其他事项外,还必须以致力于本地新闻采集和本地节目制作为条件。实际上,hr4882可能会切断大中型市场的本地广播服务的可用资源。hr4882法案要求广播公司忽视市场需求,取而代之的是播放满足政治需求的节目,这将削弱地方广播公司的力量,并破坏它旨在促进的东西——地方广播服务。重振和振兴地方商业广播服务的目标,如果要实现的话,只有在国会解除束缚广播公司应对新竞争压力的能力的束缚时才能实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Local Broadcasting in Extremis
A piece of legislation recently introduced by Representatives Anna Eshoo (D-CA 14th) and Tammy Baldwin (D-WI 2nd) that they call the "Broadcast Licensing in the Public Interest Act" (HR 4882), might deserve a better appellation as the "Eradication of Broadcasting Act." At the heart of HR 4882 is a desire that broadcasters carry more of the content Representatives Eshoo and Baldwin favor: local public affairs programming and political coverage. In their view, the public interest is served by such programming and not by other fare that is more popular with viewers. The bill would also make broadcast license renewals conditioned on a showing of, among other things, a dedication to local news gathering [and] local production of programming. In actuality HR 4882 threatens to choke off the resources available for local broadcast service in medium and larger markets. By requiring broadcasters to ignore market demands and instead carry programming to meet political demands, HR 4882 would enervate local broadcasters and undermine the very thing it purports to promote - local broadcast service. The goal of re-energizing and revitalizing local commercial broadcast service, if it ever is to be realized, will come only when Congress removes the shackles that bind broadcasters' ability to respond to new competitive pressures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信