在细菌污染的前交叉韧带重建中,转运和经胫骨技术中多种器械改变的影响:一项随机对照研究

Mohamed -E. Abd-Elsalam, H. Elkady, Mohamed Abokrisha, Kerolos T. Matta
{"title":"在细菌污染的前交叉韧带重建中,转运和经胫骨技术中多种器械改变的影响:一项随机对照研究","authors":"Mohamed -E. Abd-Elsalam, H. Elkady, Mohamed Abokrisha, Kerolos T. Matta","doi":"10.4103/jcmrp.jcmrp_86_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background In transtibial technique (TT) for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) few instruments pass through the anteromedial portal track (probe, basket, diathermy), but in transportal (Anteromedial portal [AMP]) technique a lot of instruments pass through the anteromedial portal track (probe, basket, diathermy, wire, drill, and screw). Purpose To detect the instrumentation changing effect regarding bacterial contamination in transportal technique and TT for ACL-R. Type of study Randomized controlled study. Patients and methods A total of 80 patients who preceded arthroscopic ACL-R in Assiut Arthroscopy and Sport Injuries Unit in Assiut University Hospital between March 2021 and September 2021 were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 26 years. Of the patients, 68 cases were males and 12 cases were females. Thirty-five patients underwent the procedure using the TT technique and 45 patients by the AMP technique, through computed randomization. Cotton swabs had been taken of the subcutaneous tissue at the anteromedial portal track in transportal technique and TT before and after instrumentation and femoral tunnel drilling; a control sample was taken from anterolateral track in both techniques. Results There were no positive swabs in both TT and transportal technique in all patients included in the study. Conclusion There is no effect of changing multiple instrumentation on bacterial contamination in transportal technique and TT for ACL reconstruction.","PeriodicalId":110854,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Current Medical Research and Practice","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of multiple instrumentation changing in transportal and transtibial techniques for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction regarding bacterial contamination: a randomized controlled study\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed -E. Abd-Elsalam, H. Elkady, Mohamed Abokrisha, Kerolos T. Matta\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jcmrp.jcmrp_86_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background In transtibial technique (TT) for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) few instruments pass through the anteromedial portal track (probe, basket, diathermy), but in transportal (Anteromedial portal [AMP]) technique a lot of instruments pass through the anteromedial portal track (probe, basket, diathermy, wire, drill, and screw). Purpose To detect the instrumentation changing effect regarding bacterial contamination in transportal technique and TT for ACL-R. Type of study Randomized controlled study. Patients and methods A total of 80 patients who preceded arthroscopic ACL-R in Assiut Arthroscopy and Sport Injuries Unit in Assiut University Hospital between March 2021 and September 2021 were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 26 years. Of the patients, 68 cases were males and 12 cases were females. Thirty-five patients underwent the procedure using the TT technique and 45 patients by the AMP technique, through computed randomization. Cotton swabs had been taken of the subcutaneous tissue at the anteromedial portal track in transportal technique and TT before and after instrumentation and femoral tunnel drilling; a control sample was taken from anterolateral track in both techniques. Results There were no positive swabs in both TT and transportal technique in all patients included in the study. Conclusion There is no effect of changing multiple instrumentation on bacterial contamination in transportal technique and TT for ACL reconstruction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":110854,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Current Medical Research and Practice\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Current Medical Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcmrp.jcmrp_86_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Current Medical Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcmrp.jcmrp_86_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景在前交叉韧带重建(ACL-R)的经胫技术(TT)中,很少有器械通过门静脉前内侧径道(探头、筐、透热),而在运输(前内侧门静脉[AMP])技术中,很多器械通过门静脉前内侧径道(探头、筐、透热、钢丝、钻、螺钉)。目的探讨ACL-R转运技术和TT对细菌污染的仪器更换效果。研究类型随机对照研究。患者和方法共纳入了2021年3月至2021年9月期间在Assiut大学医院Assiut关节镜和运动损伤科接受关节镜ACL-R手术的80例患者。患者的平均年龄为26岁。其中男性68例,女性12例。通过随机化计算,35例患者采用TT技术,45例患者采用AMP技术。在内固定和股骨隧道钻孔前后,分别在运输技术和TT中门静脉前内侧轨道处取皮下组织棉签;在这两种技术中,从前外侧轨道取一个对照样本。结果本组患者TT和转运技术均无阳性拭子。结论更换多种器械对前交叉韧带重建中转运技术和TT的细菌污染无影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of multiple instrumentation changing in transportal and transtibial techniques for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction regarding bacterial contamination: a randomized controlled study
Background In transtibial technique (TT) for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) few instruments pass through the anteromedial portal track (probe, basket, diathermy), but in transportal (Anteromedial portal [AMP]) technique a lot of instruments pass through the anteromedial portal track (probe, basket, diathermy, wire, drill, and screw). Purpose To detect the instrumentation changing effect regarding bacterial contamination in transportal technique and TT for ACL-R. Type of study Randomized controlled study. Patients and methods A total of 80 patients who preceded arthroscopic ACL-R in Assiut Arthroscopy and Sport Injuries Unit in Assiut University Hospital between March 2021 and September 2021 were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 26 years. Of the patients, 68 cases were males and 12 cases were females. Thirty-five patients underwent the procedure using the TT technique and 45 patients by the AMP technique, through computed randomization. Cotton swabs had been taken of the subcutaneous tissue at the anteromedial portal track in transportal technique and TT before and after instrumentation and femoral tunnel drilling; a control sample was taken from anterolateral track in both techniques. Results There were no positive swabs in both TT and transportal technique in all patients included in the study. Conclusion There is no effect of changing multiple instrumentation on bacterial contamination in transportal technique and TT for ACL reconstruction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信