Mohamed -E. Abd-Elsalam, H. Elkady, Mohamed Abokrisha, Kerolos T. Matta
{"title":"在细菌污染的前交叉韧带重建中,转运和经胫骨技术中多种器械改变的影响:一项随机对照研究","authors":"Mohamed -E. Abd-Elsalam, H. Elkady, Mohamed Abokrisha, Kerolos T. Matta","doi":"10.4103/jcmrp.jcmrp_86_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background In transtibial technique (TT) for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) few instruments pass through the anteromedial portal track (probe, basket, diathermy), but in transportal (Anteromedial portal [AMP]) technique a lot of instruments pass through the anteromedial portal track (probe, basket, diathermy, wire, drill, and screw). Purpose To detect the instrumentation changing effect regarding bacterial contamination in transportal technique and TT for ACL-R. Type of study Randomized controlled study. Patients and methods A total of 80 patients who preceded arthroscopic ACL-R in Assiut Arthroscopy and Sport Injuries Unit in Assiut University Hospital between March 2021 and September 2021 were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 26 years. Of the patients, 68 cases were males and 12 cases were females. Thirty-five patients underwent the procedure using the TT technique and 45 patients by the AMP technique, through computed randomization. Cotton swabs had been taken of the subcutaneous tissue at the anteromedial portal track in transportal technique and TT before and after instrumentation and femoral tunnel drilling; a control sample was taken from anterolateral track in both techniques. Results There were no positive swabs in both TT and transportal technique in all patients included in the study. Conclusion There is no effect of changing multiple instrumentation on bacterial contamination in transportal technique and TT for ACL reconstruction.","PeriodicalId":110854,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Current Medical Research and Practice","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of multiple instrumentation changing in transportal and transtibial techniques for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction regarding bacterial contamination: a randomized controlled study\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed -E. Abd-Elsalam, H. Elkady, Mohamed Abokrisha, Kerolos T. Matta\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jcmrp.jcmrp_86_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background In transtibial technique (TT) for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) few instruments pass through the anteromedial portal track (probe, basket, diathermy), but in transportal (Anteromedial portal [AMP]) technique a lot of instruments pass through the anteromedial portal track (probe, basket, diathermy, wire, drill, and screw). Purpose To detect the instrumentation changing effect regarding bacterial contamination in transportal technique and TT for ACL-R. Type of study Randomized controlled study. Patients and methods A total of 80 patients who preceded arthroscopic ACL-R in Assiut Arthroscopy and Sport Injuries Unit in Assiut University Hospital between March 2021 and September 2021 were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 26 years. Of the patients, 68 cases were males and 12 cases were females. Thirty-five patients underwent the procedure using the TT technique and 45 patients by the AMP technique, through computed randomization. Cotton swabs had been taken of the subcutaneous tissue at the anteromedial portal track in transportal technique and TT before and after instrumentation and femoral tunnel drilling; a control sample was taken from anterolateral track in both techniques. Results There were no positive swabs in both TT and transportal technique in all patients included in the study. Conclusion There is no effect of changing multiple instrumentation on bacterial contamination in transportal technique and TT for ACL reconstruction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":110854,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Current Medical Research and Practice\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Current Medical Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcmrp.jcmrp_86_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Current Medical Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcmrp.jcmrp_86_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effect of multiple instrumentation changing in transportal and transtibial techniques for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction regarding bacterial contamination: a randomized controlled study
Background In transtibial technique (TT) for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) few instruments pass through the anteromedial portal track (probe, basket, diathermy), but in transportal (Anteromedial portal [AMP]) technique a lot of instruments pass through the anteromedial portal track (probe, basket, diathermy, wire, drill, and screw). Purpose To detect the instrumentation changing effect regarding bacterial contamination in transportal technique and TT for ACL-R. Type of study Randomized controlled study. Patients and methods A total of 80 patients who preceded arthroscopic ACL-R in Assiut Arthroscopy and Sport Injuries Unit in Assiut University Hospital between March 2021 and September 2021 were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 26 years. Of the patients, 68 cases were males and 12 cases were females. Thirty-five patients underwent the procedure using the TT technique and 45 patients by the AMP technique, through computed randomization. Cotton swabs had been taken of the subcutaneous tissue at the anteromedial portal track in transportal technique and TT before and after instrumentation and femoral tunnel drilling; a control sample was taken from anterolateral track in both techniques. Results There were no positive swabs in both TT and transportal technique in all patients included in the study. Conclusion There is no effect of changing multiple instrumentation on bacterial contamination in transportal technique and TT for ACL reconstruction.