疟疾长期免疫需要活寄生虫。

Acta Leidensia Pub Date : 1991-01-01
W M Eling, C Celluzzi, C C Hermsen, T van de Wiel, J Curfs, P L Liem
{"title":"疟疾长期免疫需要活寄生虫。","authors":"W M Eling,&nbsp;C Celluzzi,&nbsp;C C Hermsen,&nbsp;T van de Wiel,&nbsp;J Curfs,&nbsp;P L Liem","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>All of the results of the various experiments support a role for living, proliferating parasites in the efficient induction of anti-parasitic as well as anti-disease (CM) immunity. Non-proliferating parasites or material from disrupted parasites are poor or non-antigens in this respect. Three possibilities as to why living parasites are important in immunity could be considered: 1. circulating parasites contain insufficient antigen to induce protective immunity, but sufficient antigen can be produced during proliferation; 2. only circulating parasites arrive at critical places (e.g. parts of the white pulp of the spleen) for the presentation of the important antigen or induction of appropriate signals. 3. Architectural changes are needed (i.e. formation of barrie-cell-complexes) for the immune response to be effective. The first possibility explains why exoantigens, as well as live, proliferating parasites are efficient inducers of anti-CM immunity. Since these immunizations have no effect on parasitemia, additional/other immune reaction(s) are needed for anti-parasitic immunity. The important role of the spleen in malaria and malaria immunity is well-known. The second possibility includes the idea that live, proliferating parasites circulate through the spleen continuously where unsatisfactory or infected erythrocytes are removed rather than in the liver. Injected killed parasites or material from them when present in the circulation is to a larger extent taken up by the Kupffer cells from the liver rather than the spleen. Presence and uptake of parasites in the spleen may provide the critical confrontation and/or delivery of signals necessary for the development of immunity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":7108,"journal":{"name":"Acta Leidensia","volume":"60 1","pages":"167-75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The need for live parasites for long-term immunity in malaria.\",\"authors\":\"W M Eling,&nbsp;C Celluzzi,&nbsp;C C Hermsen,&nbsp;T van de Wiel,&nbsp;J Curfs,&nbsp;P L Liem\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>All of the results of the various experiments support a role for living, proliferating parasites in the efficient induction of anti-parasitic as well as anti-disease (CM) immunity. Non-proliferating parasites or material from disrupted parasites are poor or non-antigens in this respect. Three possibilities as to why living parasites are important in immunity could be considered: 1. circulating parasites contain insufficient antigen to induce protective immunity, but sufficient antigen can be produced during proliferation; 2. only circulating parasites arrive at critical places (e.g. parts of the white pulp of the spleen) for the presentation of the important antigen or induction of appropriate signals. 3. Architectural changes are needed (i.e. formation of barrie-cell-complexes) for the immune response to be effective. The first possibility explains why exoantigens, as well as live, proliferating parasites are efficient inducers of anti-CM immunity. Since these immunizations have no effect on parasitemia, additional/other immune reaction(s) are needed for anti-parasitic immunity. The important role of the spleen in malaria and malaria immunity is well-known. The second possibility includes the idea that live, proliferating parasites circulate through the spleen continuously where unsatisfactory or infected erythrocytes are removed rather than in the liver. Injected killed parasites or material from them when present in the circulation is to a larger extent taken up by the Kupffer cells from the liver rather than the spleen. Presence and uptake of parasites in the spleen may provide the critical confrontation and/or delivery of signals necessary for the development of immunity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7108,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Leidensia\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"167-75\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Leidensia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Leidensia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

各种实验的所有结果都支持活的、增殖的寄生虫在有效诱导抗寄生虫和抗疾病(CM)免疫中的作用。在这方面,非增殖的寄生虫或来自被破坏的寄生虫的物质是差的或非抗原。关于为什么活寄生虫对免疫很重要,可以考虑三种可能性:循环寄生虫含有的抗原不足以诱导保护性免疫,但在增殖过程中可以产生足够的抗原;2. 只有循环寄生虫到达关键部位(如脾脏白髓的部分),以呈递重要抗原或诱导适当的信号。3.为了使免疫反应有效,需要改变结构(即形成屏障细胞复合物)。第一种可能解释了为什么外抗原以及活的、增殖的寄生虫是抗cm免疫的有效诱导剂。由于这些免疫对寄生虫病没有影响,因此需要额外/其他免疫反应来获得抗寄生虫免疫。脾在疟疾和疟疾免疫中的重要作用是众所周知的。第二种可能性包括活的、增殖的寄生虫在脾脏中不断循环,不满意的或被感染的红细胞被清除,而不是在肝脏中。注射的被杀死的寄生虫或它们的物质,当存在于循环中时,在更大程度上被来自肝脏而不是脾脏的库普弗细胞所吸收。脾脏中寄生虫的存在和摄取可能提供关键的对抗和/或传递免疫发展所需的信号。(摘要删节250字)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The need for live parasites for long-term immunity in malaria.

All of the results of the various experiments support a role for living, proliferating parasites in the efficient induction of anti-parasitic as well as anti-disease (CM) immunity. Non-proliferating parasites or material from disrupted parasites are poor or non-antigens in this respect. Three possibilities as to why living parasites are important in immunity could be considered: 1. circulating parasites contain insufficient antigen to induce protective immunity, but sufficient antigen can be produced during proliferation; 2. only circulating parasites arrive at critical places (e.g. parts of the white pulp of the spleen) for the presentation of the important antigen or induction of appropriate signals. 3. Architectural changes are needed (i.e. formation of barrie-cell-complexes) for the immune response to be effective. The first possibility explains why exoantigens, as well as live, proliferating parasites are efficient inducers of anti-CM immunity. Since these immunizations have no effect on parasitemia, additional/other immune reaction(s) are needed for anti-parasitic immunity. The important role of the spleen in malaria and malaria immunity is well-known. The second possibility includes the idea that live, proliferating parasites circulate through the spleen continuously where unsatisfactory or infected erythrocytes are removed rather than in the liver. Injected killed parasites or material from them when present in the circulation is to a larger extent taken up by the Kupffer cells from the liver rather than the spleen. Presence and uptake of parasites in the spleen may provide the critical confrontation and/or delivery of signals necessary for the development of immunity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信