人膀胱癌敏感细胞系及其耐阿霉素亚群对阿霉素的摄取和排出。

J I Usansky, M Liebert, G Wedemeyer, H B Grossman, J G Wagner
{"title":"人膀胱癌敏感细胞系及其耐阿霉素亚群对阿霉素的摄取和排出。","authors":"J I Usansky,&nbsp;M Liebert,&nbsp;G Wedemeyer,&nbsp;H B Grossman,&nbsp;J G Wagner","doi":"10.1089/sct.1991.7.139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The uptake and efflux of doxorubicin (Dox) were investigated in a human bladder cancer cell line (UM-UC-6) and in a multi-drug resistant (mdr) subline (UM-UC-6Dox). Unlike previous reports, the initial uptake kinetics of Dox, and its accumulation and retention to steady-state were modelled mathematically. Cells were incubated with Dox and the amount of Dox in the cellular and medium phases was measured by a specific HPLC method. When monitored for 1 min from 0.02 microM to 25 microM Dox, the uptake was very rapid but was significantly faster in the resistant cell line. The initial rate of uptake at t = 0 followed Michaelis-Menten kinetics yielding Vmax values (the maximal rate of uptake) of 15.0 +/- 1.7 and 12.9 +/- 1.2 nmol/10(6)/min and Km (rate at Vmax/2) of 25.2 +/- 4.7 and 16.4 +/- 2.9 microM for UM-UC-6 and UM-UC-6Dox, respectively. There was no metabolism of Dox by keto-reduction or reductive hydrolysis. At 1.0 microM the uptake of Dox to steady-state was biexponential but there was no difference in total cellular Dox concentration between the two cell lines at equilibrium. A 3 compartment sequential closed model was fitted yielding significantly different values for the intercompartmental and hybrid rate constants, indicating altered intracellular distribution in resistant cells. Verapamil (10 microM), trifluoperazine (10 microM) or Tween 80 (0.005%) had no effect on the uptake or efflux of Dox. The UM-UC-6Dox line appeared to show atypical mdr characteristics since net drug accumulation was not lowered and classic P-glycoprotein inhibitors were not effective. The primary mechanism of Dox resistance is not enhanced metabolism or lowered intracellular concentrations.</p>","PeriodicalId":21792,"journal":{"name":"Selective cancer therapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/sct.1991.7.139","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The uptake and efflux of doxorubicin by a sensitive human bladder cancer cell line and its doxorubicin-resistant subline.\",\"authors\":\"J I Usansky,&nbsp;M Liebert,&nbsp;G Wedemeyer,&nbsp;H B Grossman,&nbsp;J G Wagner\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/sct.1991.7.139\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The uptake and efflux of doxorubicin (Dox) were investigated in a human bladder cancer cell line (UM-UC-6) and in a multi-drug resistant (mdr) subline (UM-UC-6Dox). Unlike previous reports, the initial uptake kinetics of Dox, and its accumulation and retention to steady-state were modelled mathematically. Cells were incubated with Dox and the amount of Dox in the cellular and medium phases was measured by a specific HPLC method. When monitored for 1 min from 0.02 microM to 25 microM Dox, the uptake was very rapid but was significantly faster in the resistant cell line. The initial rate of uptake at t = 0 followed Michaelis-Menten kinetics yielding Vmax values (the maximal rate of uptake) of 15.0 +/- 1.7 and 12.9 +/- 1.2 nmol/10(6)/min and Km (rate at Vmax/2) of 25.2 +/- 4.7 and 16.4 +/- 2.9 microM for UM-UC-6 and UM-UC-6Dox, respectively. There was no metabolism of Dox by keto-reduction or reductive hydrolysis. At 1.0 microM the uptake of Dox to steady-state was biexponential but there was no difference in total cellular Dox concentration between the two cell lines at equilibrium. A 3 compartment sequential closed model was fitted yielding significantly different values for the intercompartmental and hybrid rate constants, indicating altered intracellular distribution in resistant cells. Verapamil (10 microM), trifluoperazine (10 microM) or Tween 80 (0.005%) had no effect on the uptake or efflux of Dox. The UM-UC-6Dox line appeared to show atypical mdr characteristics since net drug accumulation was not lowered and classic P-glycoprotein inhibitors were not effective. The primary mechanism of Dox resistance is not enhanced metabolism or lowered intracellular concentrations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21792,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Selective cancer therapeutics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/sct.1991.7.139\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Selective cancer therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/sct.1991.7.139\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Selective cancer therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/sct.1991.7.139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

研究了阿霉素(Dox)在人膀胱癌细胞系(UM-UC-6)和多药耐药亚系(UM-UC-6Dox)中的摄取和排出情况。与之前的报道不同,本文对Dox的初始摄取动力学及其积累和保持稳态进行了数学建模。用Dox孵育细胞,用高效液相色谱法测定细胞和培养基中Dox的含量。当从0.02微米至25微米的Dox监测1分钟时,摄取非常迅速,但在抗性细胞系中明显更快。在t = 0时,UM-UC-6和UM-UC-6Dox的初始摄取速率遵循Michaelis-Menten动力学,Vmax值(最大摄取速率)分别为15.0 +/- 1.7和12.9 +/- 1.2 nmol/10(6)/min, Km (Vmax/2速率)分别为25.2 +/- 4.7和16.4 +/- 2.9 microM。未通过酮还原或还原性水解代谢Dox。在1.0微米时,Dox的摄取呈双指数增长,但在平衡状态下,两种细胞系的细胞总Dox浓度没有差异。拟合的3室序贯封闭模型得到了室间和杂交速率常数的显著不同值,表明耐药细胞内分布发生了变化。维拉帕米(10微米)、三氟拉嗪(10微米)或Tween 80(0.005%)对Dox的摄取或排出没有影响。UM-UC-6Dox系表现出非典型的耐多药特征,因为净药物积累没有降低,经典p -糖蛋白抑制剂无效。Dox耐药的主要机制不是代谢增强或细胞内浓度降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The uptake and efflux of doxorubicin by a sensitive human bladder cancer cell line and its doxorubicin-resistant subline.

The uptake and efflux of doxorubicin (Dox) were investigated in a human bladder cancer cell line (UM-UC-6) and in a multi-drug resistant (mdr) subline (UM-UC-6Dox). Unlike previous reports, the initial uptake kinetics of Dox, and its accumulation and retention to steady-state were modelled mathematically. Cells were incubated with Dox and the amount of Dox in the cellular and medium phases was measured by a specific HPLC method. When monitored for 1 min from 0.02 microM to 25 microM Dox, the uptake was very rapid but was significantly faster in the resistant cell line. The initial rate of uptake at t = 0 followed Michaelis-Menten kinetics yielding Vmax values (the maximal rate of uptake) of 15.0 +/- 1.7 and 12.9 +/- 1.2 nmol/10(6)/min and Km (rate at Vmax/2) of 25.2 +/- 4.7 and 16.4 +/- 2.9 microM for UM-UC-6 and UM-UC-6Dox, respectively. There was no metabolism of Dox by keto-reduction or reductive hydrolysis. At 1.0 microM the uptake of Dox to steady-state was biexponential but there was no difference in total cellular Dox concentration between the two cell lines at equilibrium. A 3 compartment sequential closed model was fitted yielding significantly different values for the intercompartmental and hybrid rate constants, indicating altered intracellular distribution in resistant cells. Verapamil (10 microM), trifluoperazine (10 microM) or Tween 80 (0.005%) had no effect on the uptake or efflux of Dox. The UM-UC-6Dox line appeared to show atypical mdr characteristics since net drug accumulation was not lowered and classic P-glycoprotein inhibitors were not effective. The primary mechanism of Dox resistance is not enhanced metabolism or lowered intracellular concentrations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信