科学科学过程模型对学生在科学科目中的认知学习结果的影响

Amat Amat, Hartini Haritani, M. K. Wazni
{"title":"科学科学过程模型对学生在科学科目中的认知学习结果的影响","authors":"Amat Amat, Hartini Haritani, M. K. Wazni","doi":"10.31539/joeai.v5i2.4397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to determine whether the influence of guided inquiry learning models and pro-science skills on the cognitive learning outcomes of grade V science students. This type of research is Quasi-Experimental research  with a research design using T treatment by Level 2x2. The population in this study were grade V students of elementary school. This research instrument is a multiple-choice test with a total of 20 questions. Data processing techniques and data analysis are descriptive statistics and infrencial statistics with SPSS 22. The data analysis results show significant differences in student cognitive learning outcomes with guided inquiry methods and science process skills, namely sig. = 0.000 < 0.05, meaning that there are differences in learning outcomes taught by guided inquiry (experimental class) with student learning outcomes taught by conventional approaches (control classes). Furthermore, there is an interaction caused between the use of guided inquiry methods by looking at the level of skills of the student's science process towards the cognitive learning outcomes. This can also be proven from the hypothesis test results, namely with a value of sig. = 0.000 < 0.05 means that there is a significant interaction between the use of guided inquiry and the skill level of the student's science process to influence the cognitive learning outcomes of students together. The conclusion of this study is that there is no significant interaction between science process skills and learning outcomes. The cognitive learning outcomes of students who were taught using the guided inquiry learning model were higher than those taught using the conventional learning model for students with low science process skills. \n  \nKeywords: Guided Inquiry, Learning Outcomes, Process Skills","PeriodicalId":120998,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education and Instruction (JOEAI)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pengaruh Model Inkuiri Terbimbing dan Keterampilan Proses Sains terhadap Hasil Belajar Kognitif Siswa pada Mata Pelajaran IPA\",\"authors\":\"Amat Amat, Hartini Haritani, M. K. Wazni\",\"doi\":\"10.31539/joeai.v5i2.4397\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to determine whether the influence of guided inquiry learning models and pro-science skills on the cognitive learning outcomes of grade V science students. This type of research is Quasi-Experimental research  with a research design using T treatment by Level 2x2. The population in this study were grade V students of elementary school. This research instrument is a multiple-choice test with a total of 20 questions. Data processing techniques and data analysis are descriptive statistics and infrencial statistics with SPSS 22. The data analysis results show significant differences in student cognitive learning outcomes with guided inquiry methods and science process skills, namely sig. = 0.000 < 0.05, meaning that there are differences in learning outcomes taught by guided inquiry (experimental class) with student learning outcomes taught by conventional approaches (control classes). Furthermore, there is an interaction caused between the use of guided inquiry methods by looking at the level of skills of the student's science process towards the cognitive learning outcomes. This can also be proven from the hypothesis test results, namely with a value of sig. = 0.000 < 0.05 means that there is a significant interaction between the use of guided inquiry and the skill level of the student's science process to influence the cognitive learning outcomes of students together. The conclusion of this study is that there is no significant interaction between science process skills and learning outcomes. The cognitive learning outcomes of students who were taught using the guided inquiry learning model were higher than those taught using the conventional learning model for students with low science process skills. \\n  \\nKeywords: Guided Inquiry, Learning Outcomes, Process Skills\",\"PeriodicalId\":120998,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Education and Instruction (JOEAI)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Education and Instruction (JOEAI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31539/joeai.v5i2.4397\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education and Instruction (JOEAI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31539/joeai.v5i2.4397","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究旨在探讨引导探究学习模式与亲科学技能对五年级理科学生认知学习结果的影响。这类研究是准实验研究,研究设计采用2x2水平的T处理。本研究以小学五年级学生为研究对象。这个研究工具是一个选择题测试,总共有20个问题。数据处理技术和数据分析是用SPSS 22进行描述性统计和推断性统计。数据分析结果显示,导探究法和科学过程技能的学生认知学习成果差异显著,即sig = 0.000 < 0.05,即导探究法(实验班)与常规方法(对照班)的学生学习成果存在差异。此外,通过观察学生科学过程的技能水平,引导探究方法的使用与认知学习结果之间存在相互作用。这也可以从假设检验结果中得到证明,即当sig值= 0.000 < 0.05时,说明引导探究的使用与学生科学过程的技能水平之间存在显著的交互作用,共同影响学生的认知学习结果。本研究的结论是,科学过程技能与学习成果之间没有显著的交互作用。在科学过程技能较低的学生中,采用引导性探究学习模式教学的学生的认知学习结果高于采用传统学习模式教学的学生。关键词:引导探究,学习成果,过程技能
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pengaruh Model Inkuiri Terbimbing dan Keterampilan Proses Sains terhadap Hasil Belajar Kognitif Siswa pada Mata Pelajaran IPA
This study aims to determine whether the influence of guided inquiry learning models and pro-science skills on the cognitive learning outcomes of grade V science students. This type of research is Quasi-Experimental research  with a research design using T treatment by Level 2x2. The population in this study were grade V students of elementary school. This research instrument is a multiple-choice test with a total of 20 questions. Data processing techniques and data analysis are descriptive statistics and infrencial statistics with SPSS 22. The data analysis results show significant differences in student cognitive learning outcomes with guided inquiry methods and science process skills, namely sig. = 0.000 < 0.05, meaning that there are differences in learning outcomes taught by guided inquiry (experimental class) with student learning outcomes taught by conventional approaches (control classes). Furthermore, there is an interaction caused between the use of guided inquiry methods by looking at the level of skills of the student's science process towards the cognitive learning outcomes. This can also be proven from the hypothesis test results, namely with a value of sig. = 0.000 < 0.05 means that there is a significant interaction between the use of guided inquiry and the skill level of the student's science process to influence the cognitive learning outcomes of students together. The conclusion of this study is that there is no significant interaction between science process skills and learning outcomes. The cognitive learning outcomes of students who were taught using the guided inquiry learning model were higher than those taught using the conventional learning model for students with low science process skills.   Keywords: Guided Inquiry, Learning Outcomes, Process Skills
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信