评估SMK国家3 PAYAKUMBUH 2017/2018学年中级工业实践项目的实施

Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan dan Teknologi Informasi (JIPTI) Pub Date : 2020-02-12 DOI:10.52060/pti.v1i1.300

Fauziah Zi, Muhammad Hakiki, Yogi Irdes Putra, Ahmad Ridoh

{"title":"评估SMK国家3 PAYAKUMBUH 2017/2018学年中级工业实践项目的实施","authors":"Fauziah Zi, Muhammad Hakiki, Yogi Irdes Putra, Ahmad Ridoh","doi":"10.52060/pti.v1i1.300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to evaluate the implementation of work practices Industry SMK N 3 Payakumbuh. The evaluation of the work practices of the industry (Prakerin) viewed from component design, Installation, and Cost, Product Procces faced in implementing Prakerin. Research results show that implementation of work practices in the industry of SMK N 3 Payakumbuh Computer Network Engineering program as a whole include: (1) evaluation of Goal Indicators of program design: prakerin acquire standard score 81.5% good. Then for the Preparatory Program indicators Prakerin earn standard scores 80.25%. (2) evaluation of Installation: indicator of the readiness of Teachers Supervising earn standard scores 85.33% good. then the instructor Readiness for DU/received 73% of the score is pretty standard. Next on the supporting facilities and infrastructure indicators obtained standard score 82% good. Next on the indicators of Source Funds obtain standard scores 83.33% good. Next on the relevance of the indicator Program with the needs of the Students acquire standard score 80,53% good. (3) the evaluation Process: preparation of Indicators gained 85.6% score is stdandar good. indicators for Program execution then Prakerin gained 75.83% score is fairly standard. (4) the evaluation of the Product: Indicators of Learning Assessment Participants Prakerin gained 69.75% score is fairly standard","PeriodicalId":273163,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan dan Teknologi Informasi (JIPTI)","volume":"13 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EVALUASI PELAKSANAAN PROGRAM PRAKTEK KERJA INDUSTRI SISWA KELAS XI DI SMK NEGERI 3 PAYAKUMBUH TAHUN AJARAN 2017/2018\",\"authors\":\"Fauziah Zi, Muhammad Hakiki, Yogi Irdes Putra, Ahmad Ridoh\",\"doi\":\"10.52060/pti.v1i1.300\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to evaluate the implementation of work practices Industry SMK N 3 Payakumbuh. The evaluation of the work practices of the industry (Prakerin) viewed from component design, Installation, and Cost, Product Procces faced in implementing Prakerin. Research results show that implementation of work practices in the industry of SMK N 3 Payakumbuh Computer Network Engineering program as a whole include: (1) evaluation of Goal Indicators of program design: prakerin acquire standard score 81.5% good. Then for the Preparatory Program indicators Prakerin earn standard scores 80.25%. (2) evaluation of Installation: indicator of the readiness of Teachers Supervising earn standard scores 85.33% good. then the instructor Readiness for DU/received 73% of the score is pretty standard. Next on the supporting facilities and infrastructure indicators obtained standard score 82% good. Next on the indicators of Source Funds obtain standard scores 83.33% good. Next on the relevance of the indicator Program with the needs of the Students acquire standard score 80,53% good. (3) the evaluation Process: preparation of Indicators gained 85.6% score is stdandar good. indicators for Program execution then Prakerin gained 75.83% score is fairly standard. (4) the evaluation of the Product: Indicators of Learning Assessment Participants Prakerin gained 69.75% score is fairly standard\",\"PeriodicalId\":273163,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan dan Teknologi Informasi (JIPTI)\",\"volume\":\"13 2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan dan Teknologi Informasi (JIPTI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52060/pti.v1i1.300\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan dan Teknologi Informasi (JIPTI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52060/pti.v1i1.300","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究旨在评估工作实务的执行情况。从组件设计、安装、成本、实施Prakerin所面临的产品过程等方面对行业(Prakerin)的工作实践进行评估。研究结果表明，SMK n3 Payakumbuh计算机网络工程项目在行业实施的工作实践总体包括:(1)项目设计目标指标评价:prakerin获得标准得分81.5%良好。然后在预科项目指标中，Prakerin获得了80.25%的标准分数。(2)安装评价:督导教师准备就绪指标达标得分85.33%。那么讲师准备DU/获得73%的分数是相当标准的。接下来对配套设施和基础设施指标获得标准评分82%良好。接下来对来源资金指标获得标准得分83.33%良好。接下来关于项目与需求指标的相关性，学生获得标准分80分，53%良好。(3)评价过程:各项指标编制得分85.6%，为标准良好。在Program execution的指标上，Prakerin获得了75.83%的分数，是相当标准的。(4)对产品的评价:学习评价指标参与者Prakerin获得69.75%的得分比较标准

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

EVALUASI PELAKSANAAN PROGRAM PRAKTEK KERJA INDUSTRI SISWA KELAS XI DI SMK NEGERI 3 PAYAKUMBUH TAHUN AJARAN 2017/2018

This study aims to evaluate the implementation of work practices Industry SMK N 3 Payakumbuh. The evaluation of the work practices of the industry (Prakerin) viewed from component design, Installation, and Cost, Product Procces faced in implementing Prakerin. Research results show that implementation of work practices in the industry of SMK N 3 Payakumbuh Computer Network Engineering program as a whole include: (1) evaluation of Goal Indicators of program design: prakerin acquire standard score 81.5% good. Then for the Preparatory Program indicators Prakerin earn standard scores 80.25%. (2) evaluation of Installation: indicator of the readiness of Teachers Supervising earn standard scores 85.33% good. then the instructor Readiness for DU/received 73% of the score is pretty standard. Next on the supporting facilities and infrastructure indicators obtained standard score 82% good. Next on the indicators of Source Funds obtain standard scores 83.33% good. Next on the relevance of the indicator Program with the needs of the Students acquire standard score 80,53% good. (3) the evaluation Process: preparation of Indicators gained 85.6% score is stdandar good. indicators for Program execution then Prakerin gained 75.83% score is fairly standard. (4) the evaluation of the Product: Indicators of Learning Assessment Participants Prakerin gained 69.75% score is fairly standard

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan dan Teknologi Informasi (JIPTI)

自引率

0.00%

发文量