南非的移民与政治:反移民民粹主义实践的主流化

Johannes Machinya
{"title":"南非的移民与政治:反移民民粹主义实践的主流化","authors":"Johannes Machinya","doi":"10.14426/ahmr.v8i1.1071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1994, a ‘new’ South Africa was born out of electoral democracy. While democratisation dismantled minority authoritarian rule as well as legalised racial intolerance, prejudicial and discriminatory practices remained, this time directed against foreigners. This is at variance with South Africa’s commitment to principles of liberal democracy, human rights, and regional integration. What then explains this paradox? This paper underscores that what feeds and bestows social legitimacy to xenophobia is the foregrounding of an anti-immigrant populist discourse in the mainstream political discourse with participation of political leaders from across the political spectrum. But how has a morally repugnant anti-immigrant populist practice been made a sensible and justifiable political narrative? The paper analyses the mediated populist performances of selected political leaders like press statements, public speeches, interviews, or other statements posted on social media platforms like Twitter, and how these leaders scapegoat foreigners for the challenges the country is facing.","PeriodicalId":447313,"journal":{"name":"AFRICAN HUMAN MOBILITY REVIEW","volume":"83 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Migration and Politics in South Africa Mainstreaming Anti-immigrant Populist Practice\",\"authors\":\"Johannes Machinya\",\"doi\":\"10.14426/ahmr.v8i1.1071\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 1994, a ‘new’ South Africa was born out of electoral democracy. While democratisation dismantled minority authoritarian rule as well as legalised racial intolerance, prejudicial and discriminatory practices remained, this time directed against foreigners. This is at variance with South Africa’s commitment to principles of liberal democracy, human rights, and regional integration. What then explains this paradox? This paper underscores that what feeds and bestows social legitimacy to xenophobia is the foregrounding of an anti-immigrant populist discourse in the mainstream political discourse with participation of political leaders from across the political spectrum. But how has a morally repugnant anti-immigrant populist practice been made a sensible and justifiable political narrative? The paper analyses the mediated populist performances of selected political leaders like press statements, public speeches, interviews, or other statements posted on social media platforms like Twitter, and how these leaders scapegoat foreigners for the challenges the country is facing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":447313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AFRICAN HUMAN MOBILITY REVIEW\",\"volume\":\"83 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AFRICAN HUMAN MOBILITY REVIEW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14426/ahmr.v8i1.1071\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AFRICAN HUMAN MOBILITY REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14426/ahmr.v8i1.1071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

1994年,一个“新”南非在选举民主中诞生。虽然民主化拆除了少数人的独裁统治,并使种族不容忍合法化,但偏见和歧视的做法仍然存在,这一次是针对外国人的。这与南非对自由民主、人权和区域一体化原则的承诺是不一致的。那么如何解释这个悖论呢?本文强调,在各政治派别政治领导人的参与下,反移民民粹主义话语在主流政治话语中的前景为仇外心理提供了支持并赋予了社会合法性。但是,一种道德上令人反感的反移民民粹主义做法是如何成为一种明智而合理的政治叙事的呢?本文分析了选定的政治领导人的民粹主义表现,如新闻声明、公开演讲、采访或在Twitter等社交媒体平台上发布的其他声明,以及这些领导人如何将该国面临的挑战归咎于外国人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Migration and Politics in South Africa Mainstreaming Anti-immigrant Populist Practice
In 1994, a ‘new’ South Africa was born out of electoral democracy. While democratisation dismantled minority authoritarian rule as well as legalised racial intolerance, prejudicial and discriminatory practices remained, this time directed against foreigners. This is at variance with South Africa’s commitment to principles of liberal democracy, human rights, and regional integration. What then explains this paradox? This paper underscores that what feeds and bestows social legitimacy to xenophobia is the foregrounding of an anti-immigrant populist discourse in the mainstream political discourse with participation of political leaders from across the political spectrum. But how has a morally repugnant anti-immigrant populist practice been made a sensible and justifiable political narrative? The paper analyses the mediated populist performances of selected political leaders like press statements, public speeches, interviews, or other statements posted on social media platforms like Twitter, and how these leaders scapegoat foreigners for the challenges the country is facing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信