致命的细节:为什么记者需要获得政府掌握的杀人信息

Amanda R. Marino
{"title":"致命的细节:为什么记者需要获得政府掌握的杀人信息","authors":"Amanda R. Marino","doi":"10.32473/joci.5.1.133122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Freedom of information laws are vital to a free and functioning press, but their execution has mixed results, particularly when dealing with government-held information on homicide in the form of mass shootings and police killings of unarmed people of color. This study considers what FOI laws look like regarding access to homicide records, provides a case analysis of four states as examples of the varying types of FOI laws, and provides  recommendations for how to improve both the laws and their execution nationwide for enhanced police transparency.","PeriodicalId":165927,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Civic Information","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deadly Details: Why Journalists Need Access to Government-Held Information on Homicide\",\"authors\":\"Amanda R. Marino\",\"doi\":\"10.32473/joci.5.1.133122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Freedom of information laws are vital to a free and functioning press, but their execution has mixed results, particularly when dealing with government-held information on homicide in the form of mass shootings and police killings of unarmed people of color. This study considers what FOI laws look like regarding access to homicide records, provides a case analysis of four states as examples of the varying types of FOI laws, and provides  recommendations for how to improve both the laws and their execution nationwide for enhanced police transparency.\",\"PeriodicalId\":165927,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Civic Information\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Civic Information\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32473/joci.5.1.133122\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Civic Information","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32473/joci.5.1.133122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

信息自由法对新闻自由和正常运作至关重要,但其执行结果好坏参半,特别是在处理政府掌握的有关大规模枪击和警察杀害手无寸铁的有色人种等杀人事件的信息时。本研究考虑了信息自由法在获取杀人案件记录方面的情况,提供了四个州的案例分析,作为不同类型的信息自由法的例子,并就如何改善法律及其在全国范围内的执行提供了建议,以提高警察的透明度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Deadly Details: Why Journalists Need Access to Government-Held Information on Homicide
Freedom of information laws are vital to a free and functioning press, but their execution has mixed results, particularly when dealing with government-held information on homicide in the form of mass shootings and police killings of unarmed people of color. This study considers what FOI laws look like regarding access to homicide records, provides a case analysis of four states as examples of the varying types of FOI laws, and provides  recommendations for how to improve both the laws and their execution nationwide for enhanced police transparency.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信