RTL功能验证使用激励和观察覆盖

Byeong Min, G. Choi
{"title":"RTL功能验证使用激励和观察覆盖","authors":"Byeong Min, G. Choi","doi":"10.1109/HLDVT.2001.972808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Code-level coverage is often used to measure RTL-level verification progress. However, a simple code-level coverage inaccurately estimates the verification result by considering only the excitations of functional blocks. A coverage measure that considers additional verification qualities, such as conditions checking or observation, can significantly extend the verification accuracy. However, identifying a design error becomes increasingly difficult as design complexity increases. This paper presents heuristic approaches that increase the chance of detecting obvious-but-easily-missed design errors by allowing a designer/verification-engineer to define additional condition states to be checked. The verification approach is implemented using Verilog Programming Language Interface (PLI) and several benchmark circuits are analyzed The results indicate a high correlation between actual error(design mutant) detection rate and the proposed coverage measure The proposed coverage enhances verification performance with less user interaction, fast coverage calculation, and with less system overhead.","PeriodicalId":188469,"journal":{"name":"Sixth IEEE International High-Level Design Validation and Test Workshop","volume":"481 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"RTL functional verification using excitation and observation coverage\",\"authors\":\"Byeong Min, G. Choi\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/HLDVT.2001.972808\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Code-level coverage is often used to measure RTL-level verification progress. However, a simple code-level coverage inaccurately estimates the verification result by considering only the excitations of functional blocks. A coverage measure that considers additional verification qualities, such as conditions checking or observation, can significantly extend the verification accuracy. However, identifying a design error becomes increasingly difficult as design complexity increases. This paper presents heuristic approaches that increase the chance of detecting obvious-but-easily-missed design errors by allowing a designer/verification-engineer to define additional condition states to be checked. The verification approach is implemented using Verilog Programming Language Interface (PLI) and several benchmark circuits are analyzed The results indicate a high correlation between actual error(design mutant) detection rate and the proposed coverage measure The proposed coverage enhances verification performance with less user interaction, fast coverage calculation, and with less system overhead.\",\"PeriodicalId\":188469,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sixth IEEE International High-Level Design Validation and Test Workshop\",\"volume\":\"481 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sixth IEEE International High-Level Design Validation and Test Workshop\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/HLDVT.2001.972808\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sixth IEEE International High-Level Design Validation and Test Workshop","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HLDVT.2001.972808","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

代码级别的覆盖率通常用于度量rtl级别的验证进度。然而,简单的代码级覆盖仅考虑功能块的激励而不准确地估计验证结果。考虑附加验证质量的覆盖度量,例如条件检查或观察,可以显著地扩展验证的准确性。然而,随着设计复杂性的增加,识别设计错误变得越来越困难。本文提出了启发式方法,通过允许设计人员/验证工程师定义要检查的附加条件状态,增加了检测明显但容易忽略的设计错误的机会。利用Verilog编程语言接口(PLI)实现了验证方法,并对几个基准电路进行了分析。结果表明,实际错误(设计突变)检出率与所提出的覆盖度量之间具有很高的相关性。所提出的覆盖以较少的用户交互、快速的覆盖计算和较少的系统开销提高了验证性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
RTL functional verification using excitation and observation coverage
Code-level coverage is often used to measure RTL-level verification progress. However, a simple code-level coverage inaccurately estimates the verification result by considering only the excitations of functional blocks. A coverage measure that considers additional verification qualities, such as conditions checking or observation, can significantly extend the verification accuracy. However, identifying a design error becomes increasingly difficult as design complexity increases. This paper presents heuristic approaches that increase the chance of detecting obvious-but-easily-missed design errors by allowing a designer/verification-engineer to define additional condition states to be checked. The verification approach is implemented using Verilog Programming Language Interface (PLI) and several benchmark circuits are analyzed The results indicate a high correlation between actual error(design mutant) detection rate and the proposed coverage measure The proposed coverage enhances verification performance with less user interaction, fast coverage calculation, and with less system overhead.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信