规范虚拟实践中的专业人员:在快速变化的数字工作场所中保护公众利益

Kathleen Leslie, T. Adams, S. Nelson, Sophia Myles, Aleah McCormick, Maggie Szu Nin Lin, Catharine J. Schiller, J. Shelley
{"title":"规范虚拟实践中的专业人员:在快速变化的数字工作场所中保护公众利益","authors":"Kathleen Leslie, T. Adams, S. Nelson, Sophia Myles, Aleah McCormick, Maggie Szu Nin Lin, Catharine J. Schiller, J. Shelley","doi":"10.1109/istas52410.2021.9629156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Virtual practice is increasingly transforming service delivery in many professions, particularly with the rapid shift to virtual work during the COVID-19 pandemic. Regulatory authorities face intense pressure to facilitate this type of work while upholding their legal mandate to protect the public. However, there are many legal and ethical complexities associated with regulating professionals who engage in virtual practice. Regulatory activities in the public interest have changed to encompass the following: ensuring that standards provide guidance for virtual practice on topics such as consent, documentation, and privacy [1][2]; changing entry-to-practice requirements to include digital competencies; facilitating interjurisdictional virtual practice through licensure and liability insurance changes [3][4]; and adapting continuing competence requirements and disciplinary procedures to reflect modern digital environments [5]. Our knowledge synthesis project is shaped by the question: How is the public interest conceptualized when regulating professionals engaged in virtual practice? To answer this, we are conducting two inter-related activities that we will report on in our presentation: (1) A scoping review to map the diverse and interdisciplinary academic and grey literature on this topic; and (2) Policy case studies to examine specific challenges and promising practices across Canada. These deeper dive case examples include the role of professional regulation in the expansion of for-profit telehealth in British Columbia, implementation of a regulatory sandbox for legal innovation in Ontario, new standards of practice for disruptive technologies in the Canadian optical and dental fields and the impact on competition, and an interjurisdictional registration pilot for nurses in Alberta and Saskatchewan. There has been a recent push for regulatory policy reform based on current evidence [6][7]. This knowledge synthesis will help inform regulatory innovation and research in Canada, particularly given the rapid expansion of digitally-enabled work for regulated professionals over the past year.","PeriodicalId":314239,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regulating professionals in virtual practice: Protecting the public interest in rapidly changing digital workplaces\",\"authors\":\"Kathleen Leslie, T. Adams, S. Nelson, Sophia Myles, Aleah McCormick, Maggie Szu Nin Lin, Catharine J. Schiller, J. Shelley\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/istas52410.2021.9629156\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Virtual practice is increasingly transforming service delivery in many professions, particularly with the rapid shift to virtual work during the COVID-19 pandemic. Regulatory authorities face intense pressure to facilitate this type of work while upholding their legal mandate to protect the public. However, there are many legal and ethical complexities associated with regulating professionals who engage in virtual practice. Regulatory activities in the public interest have changed to encompass the following: ensuring that standards provide guidance for virtual practice on topics such as consent, documentation, and privacy [1][2]; changing entry-to-practice requirements to include digital competencies; facilitating interjurisdictional virtual practice through licensure and liability insurance changes [3][4]; and adapting continuing competence requirements and disciplinary procedures to reflect modern digital environments [5]. Our knowledge synthesis project is shaped by the question: How is the public interest conceptualized when regulating professionals engaged in virtual practice? To answer this, we are conducting two inter-related activities that we will report on in our presentation: (1) A scoping review to map the diverse and interdisciplinary academic and grey literature on this topic; and (2) Policy case studies to examine specific challenges and promising practices across Canada. These deeper dive case examples include the role of professional regulation in the expansion of for-profit telehealth in British Columbia, implementation of a regulatory sandbox for legal innovation in Ontario, new standards of practice for disruptive technologies in the Canadian optical and dental fields and the impact on competition, and an interjurisdictional registration pilot for nurses in Alberta and Saskatchewan. There has been a recent push for regulatory policy reform based on current evidence [6][7]. This knowledge synthesis will help inform regulatory innovation and research in Canada, particularly given the rapid expansion of digitally-enabled work for regulated professionals over the past year.\",\"PeriodicalId\":314239,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/istas52410.2021.9629156\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/istas52410.2021.9629156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

虚拟实践正在日益改变许多行业的服务提供方式,特别是在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间迅速转向虚拟工作。监管机构面临着巨大的压力,既要促进这类工作,又要维护其保护公众的法律职责。然而,在规范从事虚拟实践的专业人员方面,存在许多法律和道德上的复杂性。符合公众利益的监管活动已经改变,包括以下内容:确保标准为虚拟实践提供指导,如同意、文件和隐私[1][2];改变入职要求,包括数字能力;通过执照和责任保险变更促进跨司法管辖区虚拟执业[3][4];并调整持续能力要求和纪律程序以反映现代数字环境[5]。我们的知识综合项目是由以下问题形成的:在规范从事虚拟实践的专业人员时,公共利益是如何概念化的?为了回答这个问题,我们正在进行两项相互关联的活动,我们将在我们的报告中报告:(1)范围审查,以绘制关于该主题的多样化和跨学科的学术文献和灰色文献;(2)政策案例研究,以研究加拿大各地的具体挑战和有前途的做法。这些深入研究的案例包括:专业监管在不列颠哥伦比亚省扩大营利性远程保健方面的作用、安大略省法律创新监管沙盒的实施、加拿大光学和牙科领域颠覆性技术的新实践标准及其对竞争的影响,以及阿尔伯塔省和萨斯喀彻温省的护士跨管辖区注册试点。基于现有的证据,最近出现了监管政策改革的推动[6][7]。这种知识综合将有助于为加拿大的监管创新和研究提供信息,特别是考虑到过去一年受监管专业人员数字化工作的迅速扩张。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Regulating professionals in virtual practice: Protecting the public interest in rapidly changing digital workplaces
Virtual practice is increasingly transforming service delivery in many professions, particularly with the rapid shift to virtual work during the COVID-19 pandemic. Regulatory authorities face intense pressure to facilitate this type of work while upholding their legal mandate to protect the public. However, there are many legal and ethical complexities associated with regulating professionals who engage in virtual practice. Regulatory activities in the public interest have changed to encompass the following: ensuring that standards provide guidance for virtual practice on topics such as consent, documentation, and privacy [1][2]; changing entry-to-practice requirements to include digital competencies; facilitating interjurisdictional virtual practice through licensure and liability insurance changes [3][4]; and adapting continuing competence requirements and disciplinary procedures to reflect modern digital environments [5]. Our knowledge synthesis project is shaped by the question: How is the public interest conceptualized when regulating professionals engaged in virtual practice? To answer this, we are conducting two inter-related activities that we will report on in our presentation: (1) A scoping review to map the diverse and interdisciplinary academic and grey literature on this topic; and (2) Policy case studies to examine specific challenges and promising practices across Canada. These deeper dive case examples include the role of professional regulation in the expansion of for-profit telehealth in British Columbia, implementation of a regulatory sandbox for legal innovation in Ontario, new standards of practice for disruptive technologies in the Canadian optical and dental fields and the impact on competition, and an interjurisdictional registration pilot for nurses in Alberta and Saskatchewan. There has been a recent push for regulatory policy reform based on current evidence [6][7]. This knowledge synthesis will help inform regulatory innovation and research in Canada, particularly given the rapid expansion of digitally-enabled work for regulated professionals over the past year.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信