台湾的网络空间、遗产保护与诗人之地

W. Cheang, Kuo-sheng Chang, Eileen Hung
{"title":"台湾的网络空间、遗产保护与诗人之地","authors":"W. Cheang, Kuo-sheng Chang, Eileen Hung","doi":"10.23919/PNC.2018.8579463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The advent of computers, digital data, Internet and cyberspace, which allows information to be accessed and diffused with ease, has posed a serious threat, as many people believe, to a traditional carrier of knowledge and an important constituent of cultural heritage—published books on paper. In Taiwan, the decline in bookstore sales and the closing down of more and more traditional bookstores in recent years have been greeted with alarm. Many people worry that this phenomenon signifies a drop in reading population, which means a weakening of cultural power. This paper reconsiders this seemingly alarming phenomenon by reviewing literature production and consumption in Taiwan's market. Theory-wise, it takes Greek philosopher's debate over the place of poets—Plato's denouncement of poets in The Republic, and Aristotle's defense of poets in Poetics, as a point of departure to scrutinize the role of poetic productions from ancient times to modern era. It analyzes how realistic considerations related to politics and business profits could seemingly marginalize poetic productions. Nevertheless, it proposes that cumbersome poetic works printed on paper will not be obsolete in the immediate future as long as people who have grown up reading books have not extinct. Moreover, it makes an analogy between the present phenomenon under discussion and the serious threat to traditional theaters posed by movies, which never wipe the former out. Case-wise, the paper discusses three contemporary Taiwanese authors, Giddens Ke, Chiou-yuan Lu and Lisa Liu, whose fame was established in the Internet before their books were published. The paper attempts to demonstrate that their popularity in cyberspace led to the publication of their books, which sold well in the market. It argues that cyberspace may not be a terminator of physical books when it comes to poetic productions. Readers and lovers of fictions are being drawn back to the book market where their favorite authors in cyberspace have published. Therefore, even though the medium may change from paper to digitalized formats or vice versa, poets still have a place in Taiwan. Poetic productions, as cultural items constituting a corpus of cultural heritage, may transform into digitalized formats, but their nature or essence would continue beyond the limitations of formats, just as poetic productions can transcend the limitation of reality to create fictive worlds that give pleasure to their readers.","PeriodicalId":409931,"journal":{"name":"2018 Pacific Neighborhood Consortium Annual Conference and Joint Meetings (PNC)","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cyberspace, Heritage Conservation and Poets' Place in Taiwan\",\"authors\":\"W. Cheang, Kuo-sheng Chang, Eileen Hung\",\"doi\":\"10.23919/PNC.2018.8579463\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The advent of computers, digital data, Internet and cyberspace, which allows information to be accessed and diffused with ease, has posed a serious threat, as many people believe, to a traditional carrier of knowledge and an important constituent of cultural heritage—published books on paper. In Taiwan, the decline in bookstore sales and the closing down of more and more traditional bookstores in recent years have been greeted with alarm. Many people worry that this phenomenon signifies a drop in reading population, which means a weakening of cultural power. This paper reconsiders this seemingly alarming phenomenon by reviewing literature production and consumption in Taiwan's market. Theory-wise, it takes Greek philosopher's debate over the place of poets—Plato's denouncement of poets in The Republic, and Aristotle's defense of poets in Poetics, as a point of departure to scrutinize the role of poetic productions from ancient times to modern era. It analyzes how realistic considerations related to politics and business profits could seemingly marginalize poetic productions. Nevertheless, it proposes that cumbersome poetic works printed on paper will not be obsolete in the immediate future as long as people who have grown up reading books have not extinct. Moreover, it makes an analogy between the present phenomenon under discussion and the serious threat to traditional theaters posed by movies, which never wipe the former out. Case-wise, the paper discusses three contemporary Taiwanese authors, Giddens Ke, Chiou-yuan Lu and Lisa Liu, whose fame was established in the Internet before their books were published. The paper attempts to demonstrate that their popularity in cyberspace led to the publication of their books, which sold well in the market. It argues that cyberspace may not be a terminator of physical books when it comes to poetic productions. Readers and lovers of fictions are being drawn back to the book market where their favorite authors in cyberspace have published. Therefore, even though the medium may change from paper to digitalized formats or vice versa, poets still have a place in Taiwan. Poetic productions, as cultural items constituting a corpus of cultural heritage, may transform into digitalized formats, but their nature or essence would continue beyond the limitations of formats, just as poetic productions can transcend the limitation of reality to create fictive worlds that give pleasure to their readers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":409931,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 Pacific Neighborhood Consortium Annual Conference and Joint Meetings (PNC)\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 Pacific Neighborhood Consortium Annual Conference and Joint Meetings (PNC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23919/PNC.2018.8579463\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 Pacific Neighborhood Consortium Annual Conference and Joint Meetings (PNC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/PNC.2018.8579463","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

计算机、数字数据、互联网和网络空间的出现,使信息能够轻松获取和传播,正如许多人所认为的那样,对传统的知识载体和文化遗产的重要组成部分——纸质书籍构成了严重威胁。在台湾,近年来书店销量的下滑和越来越多传统书店的倒闭已经引起了人们的警惕。许多人担心这种现象意味着阅读人口的减少,这意味着文化力量的削弱。本文通过对台湾市场文学生产与消费的考察,重新审视这一看似令人担忧的现象。在理论方面,它以希腊哲学家关于诗人地位的争论——柏拉图在《理想国》中对诗人的谴责,以及亚里士多德在《诗学》中对诗人的辩护——为出发点,审视从古代到现代诗歌作品的作用。它分析了与政治和商业利益相关的现实考虑如何使诗歌作品看似边缘化。然而,它提出,只要读书长大的人没有灭绝,繁琐的印刷在纸上的诗歌作品在不久的将来就不会过时。此外,它还将目前讨论的现象与电影对传统影院构成的严重威胁进行了类比,电影永远不会消灭传统影院。以个案的方式,本文讨论了三位当代台湾作家柯吉登斯、吕朝媛和刘丽莎,他们在出版书籍之前就已经在网络上成名。本文试图证明,他们在网络空间的受欢迎程度导致了他们的书籍的出版,并在市场上销售良好。它认为,就诗歌创作而言,网络空间可能不会成为实体书的终结者。小说的读者和爱好者正被吸引回他们喜欢的网络作家出版的图书市场。因此,即使媒介从纸媒转向数字化,或者反过来,诗人在台湾仍然有一席之地。诗歌作品作为构成文化遗产主体的文化项目,可能会向数字化形式转变,但其本质或本质将继续超越形式的限制,正如诗歌作品可以超越现实的限制,创造出给读者带来愉悦的虚拟世界。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cyberspace, Heritage Conservation and Poets' Place in Taiwan
The advent of computers, digital data, Internet and cyberspace, which allows information to be accessed and diffused with ease, has posed a serious threat, as many people believe, to a traditional carrier of knowledge and an important constituent of cultural heritage—published books on paper. In Taiwan, the decline in bookstore sales and the closing down of more and more traditional bookstores in recent years have been greeted with alarm. Many people worry that this phenomenon signifies a drop in reading population, which means a weakening of cultural power. This paper reconsiders this seemingly alarming phenomenon by reviewing literature production and consumption in Taiwan's market. Theory-wise, it takes Greek philosopher's debate over the place of poets—Plato's denouncement of poets in The Republic, and Aristotle's defense of poets in Poetics, as a point of departure to scrutinize the role of poetic productions from ancient times to modern era. It analyzes how realistic considerations related to politics and business profits could seemingly marginalize poetic productions. Nevertheless, it proposes that cumbersome poetic works printed on paper will not be obsolete in the immediate future as long as people who have grown up reading books have not extinct. Moreover, it makes an analogy between the present phenomenon under discussion and the serious threat to traditional theaters posed by movies, which never wipe the former out. Case-wise, the paper discusses three contemporary Taiwanese authors, Giddens Ke, Chiou-yuan Lu and Lisa Liu, whose fame was established in the Internet before their books were published. The paper attempts to demonstrate that their popularity in cyberspace led to the publication of their books, which sold well in the market. It argues that cyberspace may not be a terminator of physical books when it comes to poetic productions. Readers and lovers of fictions are being drawn back to the book market where their favorite authors in cyberspace have published. Therefore, even though the medium may change from paper to digitalized formats or vice versa, poets still have a place in Taiwan. Poetic productions, as cultural items constituting a corpus of cultural heritage, may transform into digitalized formats, but their nature or essence would continue beyond the limitations of formats, just as poetic productions can transcend the limitation of reality to create fictive worlds that give pleasure to their readers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信