[评估自由行走作为检测儿童非特异性支气管高反应性的激发方法]。

J Hühnerbein, A Zapletal, M Samánek
{"title":"[评估自由行走作为检测儿童非特异性支气管高反应性的激发方法]。","authors":"J Hühnerbein,&nbsp;A Zapletal,&nbsp;M Samánek","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The bronchial hyperreactivity alone does not stand for illness but it is typical of asthma. Nonspecific tests are on a low level of standardization and the results of various research groups are difficult to compare. We used the free running provocation test compared with the inhalation test of acetylcholine in a routine lung function laboratory. Using the flow-volume curve both methods were of a comparable value although not absolute equal. Running-provocation seems to be especially qualified for the ascertainment of exercise-induced bronchospasm. A preexisting obstruction more often led to a positive result with increased reaction. The MEF values on low level of FVC proved to be especially sensitive. Free-running using the flow-volume curve for evaluation of ventilation is a cheap, noninvasive, natural, and in our opinion qualified method for the estimation of nonspecific bronchial hyperreactivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":76840,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Erkrankungen der Atmungsorgane","volume":"177 3","pages":"159-69"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Evaluation of free walking as a provocation method for detection of nonspecific bronchial hyperreactivity in children].\",\"authors\":\"J Hühnerbein,&nbsp;A Zapletal,&nbsp;M Samánek\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The bronchial hyperreactivity alone does not stand for illness but it is typical of asthma. Nonspecific tests are on a low level of standardization and the results of various research groups are difficult to compare. We used the free running provocation test compared with the inhalation test of acetylcholine in a routine lung function laboratory. Using the flow-volume curve both methods were of a comparable value although not absolute equal. Running-provocation seems to be especially qualified for the ascertainment of exercise-induced bronchospasm. A preexisting obstruction more often led to a positive result with increased reaction. The MEF values on low level of FVC proved to be especially sensitive. Free-running using the flow-volume curve for evaluation of ventilation is a cheap, noninvasive, natural, and in our opinion qualified method for the estimation of nonspecific bronchial hyperreactivity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76840,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift fur Erkrankungen der Atmungsorgane\",\"volume\":\"177 3\",\"pages\":\"159-69\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift fur Erkrankungen der Atmungsorgane\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Erkrankungen der Atmungsorgane","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

支气管高反应性本身并不代表疾病,但它是哮喘的典型表现。非特异性测试的标准化程度很低,各个研究小组的结果难以比较。我们用游离激发试验与常规肺功能实验室乙酰胆碱吸入试验进行比较。使用流量-体积曲线,两种方法虽然不是绝对相等,但具有可比性。跑步诱发似乎特别适合用于确定运动性支气管痉挛。先前存在的阻塞更常导致阳性结果,反应增加。低植被覆盖度的MEF值特别敏感。使用流量-容量曲线评估通气是一种廉价、无创、自然的方法,我们认为这是一种评估非特异性支气管高反应性的合格方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Evaluation of free walking as a provocation method for detection of nonspecific bronchial hyperreactivity in children].

The bronchial hyperreactivity alone does not stand for illness but it is typical of asthma. Nonspecific tests are on a low level of standardization and the results of various research groups are difficult to compare. We used the free running provocation test compared with the inhalation test of acetylcholine in a routine lung function laboratory. Using the flow-volume curve both methods were of a comparable value although not absolute equal. Running-provocation seems to be especially qualified for the ascertainment of exercise-induced bronchospasm. A preexisting obstruction more often led to a positive result with increased reaction. The MEF values on low level of FVC proved to be especially sensitive. Free-running using the flow-volume curve for evaluation of ventilation is a cheap, noninvasive, natural, and in our opinion qualified method for the estimation of nonspecific bronchial hyperreactivity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信