在货币联盟中充当最后贷款人

Gylfi Magnusson
{"title":"在货币联盟中充当最后贷款人","authors":"Gylfi Magnusson","doi":"10.13177/IRPA.A.2014.10.2.20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The theory of optimal currency areas was developed during the 1960’s and 1970’s. At that time the international financial system was very different from the current system, banking systems were smaller and the flow of funds across borders limited. Developments in the Eurozone in recent years have shown that when the theory was developed and the decision made to adopt the euro some of the drawbacks of a common currency were not foreseen and important issues were not addressed. This includes the role of a common central bank as a lender of last resort to national governments. In addition, few foresaw how many closely linked financial systems could create problems that are unsolvable without the cooperation of several governments. An adequate framework for dealing with such problems was thus not put in place. The possibility that macro-economic shocks could originate in the financial system was mainly ignored. During the current crisis it has been necessary to address all these issues. It took four years to find a politically viable solution. This involves the redefinition of the role of the European Central Bank, making it a lender of last resort to national governments. This policy change buys time to deal with many fundamental imbalances within the Eurozone but does not in and of itself solve the underlying problems. The delay in implementing this policy was however very costly.","PeriodicalId":299250,"journal":{"name":"Stjórnmál og Stjórnsýsla","volume":"06 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lender of last resort in a monetary union\",\"authors\":\"Gylfi Magnusson\",\"doi\":\"10.13177/IRPA.A.2014.10.2.20\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The theory of optimal currency areas was developed during the 1960’s and 1970’s. At that time the international financial system was very different from the current system, banking systems were smaller and the flow of funds across borders limited. Developments in the Eurozone in recent years have shown that when the theory was developed and the decision made to adopt the euro some of the drawbacks of a common currency were not foreseen and important issues were not addressed. This includes the role of a common central bank as a lender of last resort to national governments. In addition, few foresaw how many closely linked financial systems could create problems that are unsolvable without the cooperation of several governments. An adequate framework for dealing with such problems was thus not put in place. The possibility that macro-economic shocks could originate in the financial system was mainly ignored. During the current crisis it has been necessary to address all these issues. It took four years to find a politically viable solution. This involves the redefinition of the role of the European Central Bank, making it a lender of last resort to national governments. This policy change buys time to deal with many fundamental imbalances within the Eurozone but does not in and of itself solve the underlying problems. The delay in implementing this policy was however very costly.\",\"PeriodicalId\":299250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stjórnmál og Stjórnsýsla\",\"volume\":\"06 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stjórnmál og Stjórnsýsla\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13177/IRPA.A.2014.10.2.20\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stjórnmál og Stjórnsýsla","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13177/IRPA.A.2014.10.2.20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最优货币区理论是在上世纪六七十年代发展起来的。当时的国际金融体系与现在的体系大不相同,银行体系规模较小,跨境资金流动有限。欧元区近年来的发展表明,当这一理论发展起来并决定采用欧元时,人们没有预见到共同货币的一些缺点,也没有解决一些重要问题。这包括一个共同的中央银行作为各国政府最后贷款人的角色。此外,很少有人预见到,如果没有几个政府的合作,许多紧密相连的金融体系可能会产生无法解决的问题。因此,没有建立处理这些问题的适当框架。宏观经济冲击源自金融体系的可能性基本被忽视。在当前的危机中,有必要解决所有这些问题。花了四年时间才找到一个政治上可行的解决方案。这包括重新定义欧洲央行(ecb)的角色,使其成为各国政府的最后贷款人。这一政策变化为解决欧元区内部的许多根本性失衡赢得了时间,但它本身并不能解决根本问题。然而,延迟执行这项政策的代价是非常高昂的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lender of last resort in a monetary union
The theory of optimal currency areas was developed during the 1960’s and 1970’s. At that time the international financial system was very different from the current system, banking systems were smaller and the flow of funds across borders limited. Developments in the Eurozone in recent years have shown that when the theory was developed and the decision made to adopt the euro some of the drawbacks of a common currency were not foreseen and important issues were not addressed. This includes the role of a common central bank as a lender of last resort to national governments. In addition, few foresaw how many closely linked financial systems could create problems that are unsolvable without the cooperation of several governments. An adequate framework for dealing with such problems was thus not put in place. The possibility that macro-economic shocks could originate in the financial system was mainly ignored. During the current crisis it has been necessary to address all these issues. It took four years to find a politically viable solution. This involves the redefinition of the role of the European Central Bank, making it a lender of last resort to national governments. This policy change buys time to deal with many fundamental imbalances within the Eurozone but does not in and of itself solve the underlying problems. The delay in implementing this policy was however very costly.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信