商业人类学考古学的思考

T. Malefyt
{"title":"商业人类学考古学的思考","authors":"T. Malefyt","doi":"10.22439/JBA.V5I1.5210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Business anthropology is an emergent hybrid discipline (Baba 2006) that is still in the process of becoming (Ingold 2013). Even if this process is generally at work, temporal gaps are observed in its development, following national traditions. We thus observe differences between USA and Europe, probably in relation to the dichotomy between fundamental anthropology and applied anthropology, due to different colonial heritage. However, this hybrid discipline ostensibly bridges an anthropological focus with business, design, and organizational practices and beyond. The anthropologist’s ability to “look beneath” apparent behavior and uncover deeper motivations, and link these insights to shared values and beliefs, is based on broader understandings of human behavior that organizations find useful. As obvious as this all may appear today, from the most unlikely or serendipitous of circumstances, a few pioneering adventurers in the1980s in the US and Europe began this enterprise first employed as business anthropologists.","PeriodicalId":348499,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Anthropology","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Musings on an Archaeology of Business Anthropology\",\"authors\":\"T. Malefyt\",\"doi\":\"10.22439/JBA.V5I1.5210\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Business anthropology is an emergent hybrid discipline (Baba 2006) that is still in the process of becoming (Ingold 2013). Even if this process is generally at work, temporal gaps are observed in its development, following national traditions. We thus observe differences between USA and Europe, probably in relation to the dichotomy between fundamental anthropology and applied anthropology, due to different colonial heritage. However, this hybrid discipline ostensibly bridges an anthropological focus with business, design, and organizational practices and beyond. The anthropologist’s ability to “look beneath” apparent behavior and uncover deeper motivations, and link these insights to shared values and beliefs, is based on broader understandings of human behavior that organizations find useful. As obvious as this all may appear today, from the most unlikely or serendipitous of circumstances, a few pioneering adventurers in the1980s in the US and Europe began this enterprise first employed as business anthropologists.\",\"PeriodicalId\":348499,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Business Anthropology\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Business Anthropology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22439/JBA.V5I1.5210\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22439/JBA.V5I1.5210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

商业人类学是一门新兴的混合学科(Baba 2006),仍处于发展过程中(Ingold 2013)。即使这一进程总体上是有效的,按照国家传统,在其发展过程中也观察到时间差距。因此,由于不同的殖民遗产,我们观察到美国和欧洲之间的差异,可能与基础人类学和应用人类学的二分法有关。然而,这种混合学科表面上将人类学的焦点与商业、设计和组织实践等联系起来。人类学家有能力“看穿”表面行为,发现更深层次的动机,并将这些见解与共同的价值观和信仰联系起来,这是基于对组织认为有用的人类行为的更广泛理解。尽管这一切在今天看来是显而易见的,但在最不可能或最偶然的情况下,上世纪80年代美国和欧洲的一些先锋冒险家开创了这项事业,最初是作为商业人类学家受雇的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Musings on an Archaeology of Business Anthropology
Business anthropology is an emergent hybrid discipline (Baba 2006) that is still in the process of becoming (Ingold 2013). Even if this process is generally at work, temporal gaps are observed in its development, following national traditions. We thus observe differences between USA and Europe, probably in relation to the dichotomy between fundamental anthropology and applied anthropology, due to different colonial heritage. However, this hybrid discipline ostensibly bridges an anthropological focus with business, design, and organizational practices and beyond. The anthropologist’s ability to “look beneath” apparent behavior and uncover deeper motivations, and link these insights to shared values and beliefs, is based on broader understandings of human behavior that organizations find useful. As obvious as this all may appear today, from the most unlikely or serendipitous of circumstances, a few pioneering adventurers in the1980s in the US and Europe began this enterprise first employed as business anthropologists.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信