现代主义者在法律术语和语言术语,词根,模式之间

{"title":"现代主义者在法律术语和语言术语,词根,模式之间","authors":"","doi":"10.61212/jsd/131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims at the phenomenon of interpreting the Holy Qur’an using the root term, without referring to the context of the Qur’an, the reasons for its revelation and its facts, and demonstrating the seriousness of this approach in obstructing the texts, and removing the Islamic nation from the most important sources of legislation. At the conclusion of the study, the most important results were:\nThe study confirmed that those who called for the renewal of the Qur’anic text understand the term on the intellectual and cultural basis, not on the basis of the rules of the righteous predecessors, and as a result of that, tampering with the Sharia occurred.\nThe role of the term is represented in understanding the legal texts and controlling its sciences by depicting the facts, and facilitating understanding what God wants from His discourse.\n 3. The modernists take the approach of linguistics and historicism, and rationalize the text to reproduce Islamic law, and the reason for this approach has drawbacks, including: falsifying the meaning of Islamic names and facts, depicting them in a way that is not true, and deviating from the legal meaning in the linguistic sense.","PeriodicalId":446578,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Scientific Development for Studies and Research","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The modernists between the legal term and the linguistic term, the root term, the model\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.61212/jsd/131\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research aims at the phenomenon of interpreting the Holy Qur’an using the root term, without referring to the context of the Qur’an, the reasons for its revelation and its facts, and demonstrating the seriousness of this approach in obstructing the texts, and removing the Islamic nation from the most important sources of legislation. At the conclusion of the study, the most important results were:\\nThe study confirmed that those who called for the renewal of the Qur’anic text understand the term on the intellectual and cultural basis, not on the basis of the rules of the righteous predecessors, and as a result of that, tampering with the Sharia occurred.\\nThe role of the term is represented in understanding the legal texts and controlling its sciences by depicting the facts, and facilitating understanding what God wants from His discourse.\\n 3. The modernists take the approach of linguistics and historicism, and rationalize the text to reproduce Islamic law, and the reason for this approach has drawbacks, including: falsifying the meaning of Islamic names and facts, depicting them in a way that is not true, and deviating from the legal meaning in the linguistic sense.\",\"PeriodicalId\":446578,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Scientific Development for Studies and Research\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Scientific Development for Studies and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.61212/jsd/131\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Scientific Development for Studies and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61212/jsd/131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究针对使用词根解释《古兰经》的现象,而不参考《古兰经》的背景、其启示的原因和事实,并证明这种做法在阻碍文本,使伊斯兰国家从最重要的立法来源中移除的严重性。在研究结束时,最重要的结果是:研究证实,那些呼吁更新古兰经文本的人是在知识和文化基础上理解这个术语的,而不是在正义前辈的规则基础上,因此,对伊斯兰教法的篡改发生了。这个术语的作用体现在理解法律文本和通过描述事实来控制其科学,并促进理解上帝想从他的话语中得到什么。3.现代主义者采取语言学和历史主义的方法,将文本合理化以再现伊斯兰教法,这种方法的原因有其弊端,包括:伪造伊斯兰教名和事实的意义,以不真实的方式描绘它们,偏离语言学意义上的法律意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The modernists between the legal term and the linguistic term, the root term, the model
This research aims at the phenomenon of interpreting the Holy Qur’an using the root term, without referring to the context of the Qur’an, the reasons for its revelation and its facts, and demonstrating the seriousness of this approach in obstructing the texts, and removing the Islamic nation from the most important sources of legislation. At the conclusion of the study, the most important results were: The study confirmed that those who called for the renewal of the Qur’anic text understand the term on the intellectual and cultural basis, not on the basis of the rules of the righteous predecessors, and as a result of that, tampering with the Sharia occurred. The role of the term is represented in understanding the legal texts and controlling its sciences by depicting the facts, and facilitating understanding what God wants from His discourse. 3. The modernists take the approach of linguistics and historicism, and rationalize the text to reproduce Islamic law, and the reason for this approach has drawbacks, including: falsifying the meaning of Islamic names and facts, depicting them in a way that is not true, and deviating from the legal meaning in the linguistic sense.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信