单纯hrp2型疟疾快速诊断试剂盒对加纳无症状外周血感染孕妇的诊断效果:以First Response®检测试剂盒为例

Joseph Osarfo, Harry Tagbor, M. Alifrangis, P. Magnussen
{"title":"单纯hrp2型疟疾快速诊断试剂盒对加纳无症状外周血感染孕妇的诊断效果:以First Response®检测试剂盒为例","authors":"Joseph Osarfo, Harry Tagbor, M. Alifrangis, P. Magnussen","doi":"10.46829/HSIJOURNAL.2020.12.1.2.86-92","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The use of malaria rapid diagnostic test(RDT) enables targeted treatment that mitigates against the development of parasite drug resistance. With detection thresholds at ≥200 parasites/μL, their diagnostic performance in pregnant women may be challenging as asymptomatic infections with low parasite densities are common. Few data exist on the performance of histidine-rich protein-2 (HRP2) RDTs in Ghanaian pregnant women considering commonly occurring low parasite densities. \nObjective: The study sought to contribute more knowledge on test performance on First Response® test kit to guide the continuous evaluation of HRP2 RDTs in pregnancy. Methods: As part of an antimalarial drug trial in pregnancy, First Response® RDT results were compared to microscopy of peripheral blood slides in 1664 women. The diagnostic performance indicators were computed as proportions with 95% confidence intervals. The risk of having a positive RDT result was computed for age, gravidity and parasite density using binomial regression methods.\nResults: Parasitaemia prevalence by microscopy was 5.71%(n =95/1664) while that by RDT was 21.57%(n = 359/1664). Sensitivity was 82.11% (n=78/95), specificity was 82.09% (n=1288/1569), positive predictive value was 21.73% (n=78/359), and the likelihood ratio for a positive test was 4.58. False-negative RDT results were recorded for low parasite densities as well as densities ≥ 200/ μL while false-positive results were recorded in 281of 1664 tests. Primigravidae and younger aged women were more likely to have positive RDT results compared to multigravidae and women aged ≥ 30 yr. \nConclusion: The moderate sensitivity, specificity and other diagnostic parameters reported suggest the First Response® malaria RDT is useful for detecting peripheral parasitaemia in pregnant women but the use of HRP2-only RDTs is limited by the existence of parasites with HRP2 gene deletion. The use of RDTs based on combined antigens continues to be recommended. Further research is needed on RDT performance in pregnant women with declining malaria transmission.","PeriodicalId":276774,"journal":{"name":"Second Edition in 2020 of the HSI Journal Volume 1 Issue 2 Publication","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic performance of HRP2-only malaria rapid diagnostic test in Ghanaian pregnant women with asymptomatic peripheral blood infection: the case of First Response® test kit\",\"authors\":\"Joseph Osarfo, Harry Tagbor, M. Alifrangis, P. Magnussen\",\"doi\":\"10.46829/HSIJOURNAL.2020.12.1.2.86-92\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The use of malaria rapid diagnostic test(RDT) enables targeted treatment that mitigates against the development of parasite drug resistance. With detection thresholds at ≥200 parasites/μL, their diagnostic performance in pregnant women may be challenging as asymptomatic infections with low parasite densities are common. Few data exist on the performance of histidine-rich protein-2 (HRP2) RDTs in Ghanaian pregnant women considering commonly occurring low parasite densities. \\nObjective: The study sought to contribute more knowledge on test performance on First Response® test kit to guide the continuous evaluation of HRP2 RDTs in pregnancy. Methods: As part of an antimalarial drug trial in pregnancy, First Response® RDT results were compared to microscopy of peripheral blood slides in 1664 women. The diagnostic performance indicators were computed as proportions with 95% confidence intervals. The risk of having a positive RDT result was computed for age, gravidity and parasite density using binomial regression methods.\\nResults: Parasitaemia prevalence by microscopy was 5.71%(n =95/1664) while that by RDT was 21.57%(n = 359/1664). Sensitivity was 82.11% (n=78/95), specificity was 82.09% (n=1288/1569), positive predictive value was 21.73% (n=78/359), and the likelihood ratio for a positive test was 4.58. False-negative RDT results were recorded for low parasite densities as well as densities ≥ 200/ μL while false-positive results were recorded in 281of 1664 tests. Primigravidae and younger aged women were more likely to have positive RDT results compared to multigravidae and women aged ≥ 30 yr. \\nConclusion: The moderate sensitivity, specificity and other diagnostic parameters reported suggest the First Response® malaria RDT is useful for detecting peripheral parasitaemia in pregnant women but the use of HRP2-only RDTs is limited by the existence of parasites with HRP2 gene deletion. The use of RDTs based on combined antigens continues to be recommended. Further research is needed on RDT performance in pregnant women with declining malaria transmission.\",\"PeriodicalId\":276774,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Second Edition in 2020 of the HSI Journal Volume 1 Issue 2 Publication\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Second Edition in 2020 of the HSI Journal Volume 1 Issue 2 Publication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46829/HSIJOURNAL.2020.12.1.2.86-92\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Second Edition in 2020 of the HSI Journal Volume 1 Issue 2 Publication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46829/HSIJOURNAL.2020.12.1.2.86-92","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:疟疾快速诊断试验(RDT)的使用使有针对性的治疗能够减轻寄生虫耐药性的发展。由于检测阈值≥200个寄生虫/μL,其在孕妇中的诊断性能可能具有挑战性,因为低寄生虫密度的无症状感染很常见。考虑到普遍存在的低寄生虫密度,关于富组氨酸蛋白-2 (HRP2) RDTs在加纳孕妇中的表现的数据很少。目的:探讨First Response®检测试剂盒的检测性能,指导妊娠期HRP2 rdt的持续评估。方法:作为妊娠期抗疟药物试验的一部分,我们将1664名妇女的First Response®RDT结果与外周血玻片显微镜检查结果进行了比较。诊断性能指标以95%置信区间的比例计算。采用二项回归方法计算年龄、体重和寄生虫密度的RDT阳性风险。结果:显微镜下寄生虫病患病率为5.71%(n =95/1664), RDT法为21.57%(n = 359/1664)。敏感性为82.11% (n=78/95),特异性为82.09% (n=1288/1569),阳性预测值为21.73% (n=78/359),阳性似然比为4.58。低密度及≥200/ μL的RDT检测结果为假阴性,1664例中有281例为假阳性。与多孕组和年龄≥30岁的女性相比,初产组和较年轻的女性更容易出现RDT阳性结果。结论:报告的中等敏感性、特异性和其他诊断参数表明,First Response®疟疾RDT可用于检测孕妇外周寄生虫血症,但HRP2基因缺失的寄生虫的存在限制了仅使用HRP2的RDT。继续推荐使用基于联合抗原的rdt。需要进一步研究疟疾传播下降的孕妇的RDT效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnostic performance of HRP2-only malaria rapid diagnostic test in Ghanaian pregnant women with asymptomatic peripheral blood infection: the case of First Response® test kit
Background: The use of malaria rapid diagnostic test(RDT) enables targeted treatment that mitigates against the development of parasite drug resistance. With detection thresholds at ≥200 parasites/μL, their diagnostic performance in pregnant women may be challenging as asymptomatic infections with low parasite densities are common. Few data exist on the performance of histidine-rich protein-2 (HRP2) RDTs in Ghanaian pregnant women considering commonly occurring low parasite densities. Objective: The study sought to contribute more knowledge on test performance on First Response® test kit to guide the continuous evaluation of HRP2 RDTs in pregnancy. Methods: As part of an antimalarial drug trial in pregnancy, First Response® RDT results were compared to microscopy of peripheral blood slides in 1664 women. The diagnostic performance indicators were computed as proportions with 95% confidence intervals. The risk of having a positive RDT result was computed for age, gravidity and parasite density using binomial regression methods. Results: Parasitaemia prevalence by microscopy was 5.71%(n =95/1664) while that by RDT was 21.57%(n = 359/1664). Sensitivity was 82.11% (n=78/95), specificity was 82.09% (n=1288/1569), positive predictive value was 21.73% (n=78/359), and the likelihood ratio for a positive test was 4.58. False-negative RDT results were recorded for low parasite densities as well as densities ≥ 200/ μL while false-positive results were recorded in 281of 1664 tests. Primigravidae and younger aged women were more likely to have positive RDT results compared to multigravidae and women aged ≥ 30 yr. Conclusion: The moderate sensitivity, specificity and other diagnostic parameters reported suggest the First Response® malaria RDT is useful for detecting peripheral parasitaemia in pregnant women but the use of HRP2-only RDTs is limited by the existence of parasites with HRP2 gene deletion. The use of RDTs based on combined antigens continues to be recommended. Further research is needed on RDT performance in pregnant women with declining malaria transmission.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信