房地产市场的翻转

C. Leung, C. Tse, Paul Anglin, Kosuke Aoki, Kuang-Liang Chang, Nan Chen, Patrick Ho, Min Hwang, Hirokazu Ishise, Munechika Katayama, Yuichiro Kawaguchi, Fred Kwan, Chunwei Liu, Stephen Malpezzi
{"title":"房地产市场的翻转","authors":"C. Leung, C. Tse, Paul Anglin, Kosuke Aoki, Kuang-Liang Chang, Nan Chen, Patrick Ho, Min Hwang, Hirokazu Ishise, Munechika Katayama, Yuichiro Kawaguchi, Fred Kwan, Chunwei Liu, Stephen Malpezzi","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2903014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We add arbitraging middlemen -- investors who attempt to profit from buying low and selling high -- to a canonical housing market search model. Flipping tends to take place in sluggish and tight, but not in moderate, markets. To follow is the possibility of multiple equilibria. In one equilibrium, most, if not all, transactions are intermediated, resulting in rapid turnover, a high vacancy rate, and high housing prices. In another equilibrium, few houses are bought and sold by middlemen. Turnover is slow, few houses are vacant, and prices are moderate. Moreover, flippers can enter and exit en masse in response to the smallest interest rate shock. The housing market can then be intrinsically unstable even when all flippers are akin to the arbitraging middlemen in classical finance theory. In speeding up turnover, the flipping that takes place in a sluggish and illiquid market tends to be socially beneficial. The flipping that takes place in a tight and liquid market can be wasteful as the efficiency gain from any faster turnover is unlikely to be large enough to offset the loss from more houses being left vacant in the hands of flippers. Based on our calibrated model, which matches several stylized facts of the U.S. housing market, we show that the housing price response to interest rate change is very non-linear, suggesting cautions to policy attempt to “stabilize” the housing market through monetary policy.","PeriodicalId":239768,"journal":{"name":"Urban Research eJournal","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Flipping in the Housing Market\",\"authors\":\"C. Leung, C. Tse, Paul Anglin, Kosuke Aoki, Kuang-Liang Chang, Nan Chen, Patrick Ho, Min Hwang, Hirokazu Ishise, Munechika Katayama, Yuichiro Kawaguchi, Fred Kwan, Chunwei Liu, Stephen Malpezzi\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2903014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We add arbitraging middlemen -- investors who attempt to profit from buying low and selling high -- to a canonical housing market search model. Flipping tends to take place in sluggish and tight, but not in moderate, markets. To follow is the possibility of multiple equilibria. In one equilibrium, most, if not all, transactions are intermediated, resulting in rapid turnover, a high vacancy rate, and high housing prices. In another equilibrium, few houses are bought and sold by middlemen. Turnover is slow, few houses are vacant, and prices are moderate. Moreover, flippers can enter and exit en masse in response to the smallest interest rate shock. The housing market can then be intrinsically unstable even when all flippers are akin to the arbitraging middlemen in classical finance theory. In speeding up turnover, the flipping that takes place in a sluggish and illiquid market tends to be socially beneficial. The flipping that takes place in a tight and liquid market can be wasteful as the efficiency gain from any faster turnover is unlikely to be large enough to offset the loss from more houses being left vacant in the hands of flippers. Based on our calibrated model, which matches several stylized facts of the U.S. housing market, we show that the housing price response to interest rate change is very non-linear, suggesting cautions to policy attempt to “stabilize” the housing market through monetary policy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":239768,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urban Research eJournal\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urban Research eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2903014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Research eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2903014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

我们将套利中间商——试图通过低买高卖获利的投资者——加入到一个规范的房地产市场搜索模型中。炒房往往发生在疲软和紧张的市场,而不是温和的市场。接下来是多重均衡的可能性。在一种均衡中,大多数(如果不是全部的话)交易都经过中介,导致周转迅速、空置率高和房价高。在另一种均衡中,很少有房子是通过中间商买卖的。成交量缓慢,空置房屋很少,价格适中。此外,投资者可以在最小的利率冲击下大举进场和退出。因此,即使所有炒房者都类似于经典金融理论中的套利中间商,房地产市场也可能具有内在的不稳定性。在加速交易的过程中,发生在一个缓慢而缺乏流动性的市场上的倒卖往往对社会有益。在一个紧张而流动性强的市场上发生的炒房可能是一种浪费,因为更快的交易速度所带来的效率收益,不太可能大到足以抵消更多房屋空置在炒房者手中所造成的损失。基于我们的校准模型,该模型与美国房地产市场的几个风格化事实相匹配,我们表明房价对利率变化的反应是非常非线性的,这表明通过货币政策“稳定”房地产市场的政策尝试是谨慎的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Flipping in the Housing Market
We add arbitraging middlemen -- investors who attempt to profit from buying low and selling high -- to a canonical housing market search model. Flipping tends to take place in sluggish and tight, but not in moderate, markets. To follow is the possibility of multiple equilibria. In one equilibrium, most, if not all, transactions are intermediated, resulting in rapid turnover, a high vacancy rate, and high housing prices. In another equilibrium, few houses are bought and sold by middlemen. Turnover is slow, few houses are vacant, and prices are moderate. Moreover, flippers can enter and exit en masse in response to the smallest interest rate shock. The housing market can then be intrinsically unstable even when all flippers are akin to the arbitraging middlemen in classical finance theory. In speeding up turnover, the flipping that takes place in a sluggish and illiquid market tends to be socially beneficial. The flipping that takes place in a tight and liquid market can be wasteful as the efficiency gain from any faster turnover is unlikely to be large enough to offset the loss from more houses being left vacant in the hands of flippers. Based on our calibrated model, which matches several stylized facts of the U.S. housing market, we show that the housing price response to interest rate change is very non-linear, suggesting cautions to policy attempt to “stabilize” the housing market through monetary policy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信