关于利用人工智能技术查明法医检查虚假结论的问题(根据哈萨克斯坦共和国的经验)

Denis V. Voyevodkin, G. R. Rustemova, Yernar N. Begaliyev, Kussain A. Igembayev, Zauresh N. Ayupova
{"title":"关于利用人工智能技术查明法医检查虚假结论的问题(根据哈萨克斯坦共和国的经验)","authors":"Denis V. Voyevodkin, G. R. Rustemova, Yernar N. Begaliyev, Kussain A. Igembayev, Zauresh N. Ayupova","doi":"10.17816/fm8270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article discusses the legal aspects of the use of mathematical statistics and machine learning (hereinafter referred to as artificial intelligence) in forensic activities to identify both expert errors and fake expert opinions. \nAn attempt has been made to establish criteria for evaluating the conclusions of forensic examinations in terms of determining their relevance, admissibility, reliability and objectivity, as well as the objective possibility of distinguishing expert errors from deliberately false and fake expert opinions. \nA SWOT analysis of the use of artificial intelligence was carried out to solve the issue of its application in the field under consideration, which revealed the advantages and disadvantages of its use. \nThe use of mathematical statistics and machine learning methods is not a universal way to identify fakes in expert opinions. However, given that this method can give both false positive and false negative results, its results should be verified by independent experts. \nIn addition, in order to effectively prevent the facts of falsification, it is concluded that it is necessary to take comprehensive measures, including not only the detection of manipulations, but also the prevention of the possibility of their occurrence, as well as the punishment of the perpetrators. \nTo this end, the authors have proposed a number of amendments and additions to the current legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan.","PeriodicalId":346404,"journal":{"name":"Russian Journal of Forensic Medicine","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the issue of identifying fake conclusions of forensic medical examinations through the use of artificial intelligence technology (according to the experience of the Republic of Kazakhstan)\",\"authors\":\"Denis V. Voyevodkin, G. R. Rustemova, Yernar N. Begaliyev, Kussain A. Igembayev, Zauresh N. Ayupova\",\"doi\":\"10.17816/fm8270\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article discusses the legal aspects of the use of mathematical statistics and machine learning (hereinafter referred to as artificial intelligence) in forensic activities to identify both expert errors and fake expert opinions. \\nAn attempt has been made to establish criteria for evaluating the conclusions of forensic examinations in terms of determining their relevance, admissibility, reliability and objectivity, as well as the objective possibility of distinguishing expert errors from deliberately false and fake expert opinions. \\nA SWOT analysis of the use of artificial intelligence was carried out to solve the issue of its application in the field under consideration, which revealed the advantages and disadvantages of its use. \\nThe use of mathematical statistics and machine learning methods is not a universal way to identify fakes in expert opinions. However, given that this method can give both false positive and false negative results, its results should be verified by independent experts. \\nIn addition, in order to effectively prevent the facts of falsification, it is concluded that it is necessary to take comprehensive measures, including not only the detection of manipulations, but also the prevention of the possibility of their occurrence, as well as the punishment of the perpetrators. \\nTo this end, the authors have proposed a number of amendments and additions to the current legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan.\",\"PeriodicalId\":346404,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Russian Journal of Forensic Medicine\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Russian Journal of Forensic Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17816/fm8270\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Journal of Forensic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17816/fm8270","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文讨论了在法医活动中使用数理统计和机器学习(以下简称人工智能)来识别专家错误和虚假专家意见的法律方面。已试图建立评价法医检查结论的标准,以确定其相关性、可接受性、可靠性和客观性,以及区分专家错误与故意虚假和伪造专家意见的客观可能性。通过对人工智能应用的SWOT分析,解决了人工智能在考虑领域的应用问题,揭示了人工智能使用的优势和劣势。使用数理统计和机器学习方法并不是识别专家意见造假的通用方法。但是,由于这种方法可能会产生假阳性和假阴性结果,因此其结果应该由独立的专家进行验证。此外,为了有效地防止伪造事实,结论是需要采取综合措施,不仅要发现操纵,还要防止其发生的可能性,以及对肇事者的惩罚。为此目的,作者对哈萨克斯坦共和国的现行立法提出了若干修正案和补充。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On the issue of identifying fake conclusions of forensic medical examinations through the use of artificial intelligence technology (according to the experience of the Republic of Kazakhstan)
The article discusses the legal aspects of the use of mathematical statistics and machine learning (hereinafter referred to as artificial intelligence) in forensic activities to identify both expert errors and fake expert opinions. An attempt has been made to establish criteria for evaluating the conclusions of forensic examinations in terms of determining their relevance, admissibility, reliability and objectivity, as well as the objective possibility of distinguishing expert errors from deliberately false and fake expert opinions. A SWOT analysis of the use of artificial intelligence was carried out to solve the issue of its application in the field under consideration, which revealed the advantages and disadvantages of its use. The use of mathematical statistics and machine learning methods is not a universal way to identify fakes in expert opinions. However, given that this method can give both false positive and false negative results, its results should be verified by independent experts. In addition, in order to effectively prevent the facts of falsification, it is concluded that it is necessary to take comprehensive measures, including not only the detection of manipulations, but also the prevention of the possibility of their occurrence, as well as the punishment of the perpetrators. To this end, the authors have proposed a number of amendments and additions to the current legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信