政治人物对法律主义的例外:ranciÈrian哲学外推

Muhammad Maulana Hasnan Rasyid
{"title":"政治人物对法律主义的例外:ranciÈrian哲学外推","authors":"Muhammad Maulana Hasnan Rasyid","doi":"10.47776/alwasath.v3i1.295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyzes the legal cases, namely Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) and Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka (1954), with the Rancièrian philosophical approach. Those two cases were chosen because it contains controversial legal facts, namely the issue of racial segregation. The court's decision on Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka (1954) has been an important milestone because it does not follow the precedent in Brady v. Ferguson (1896) that has legitimized racial segregation applied publicly through legal policies. This paper concludes that the subject of the political which carries equality as a axiom of politics can not only emerge from outside the police, it can also emerge from within the mechanism the police itself through the figures of the emancipated judges in the court. \n ","PeriodicalId":348932,"journal":{"name":"AL WASATH Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EXCEPTIONS TO LEGALISM BY THE FIGURE OF THE-POLITICAL: A RANCIÈRIAN PHILOSOPHICAL EXTRAPOLATION\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Maulana Hasnan Rasyid\",\"doi\":\"10.47776/alwasath.v3i1.295\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper analyzes the legal cases, namely Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) and Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka (1954), with the Rancièrian philosophical approach. Those two cases were chosen because it contains controversial legal facts, namely the issue of racial segregation. The court's decision on Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka (1954) has been an important milestone because it does not follow the precedent in Brady v. Ferguson (1896) that has legitimized racial segregation applied publicly through legal policies. This paper concludes that the subject of the political which carries equality as a axiom of politics can not only emerge from outside the police, it can also emerge from within the mechanism the police itself through the figures of the emancipated judges in the court. \\n \",\"PeriodicalId\":348932,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AL WASATH Jurnal Ilmu Hukum\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AL WASATH Jurnal Ilmu Hukum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47776/alwasath.v3i1.295\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AL WASATH Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47776/alwasath.v3i1.295","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文用rancirian哲学方法分析普莱西诉弗格森案(1896)和布朗诉托皮卡教育委员会案(1954)这两个法律案例。选择这两个案件是因为它们包含有争议的法律事实,即种族隔离问题。最高法院对布朗诉托皮卡教育委员会案(1954年)的裁决是一个重要的里程碑,因为它没有遵循布雷迪诉弗格森案(1896年)的先例,后者通过法律政策将公开实施的种族隔离合法化。本文认为,以平等为政治公理的政治主体不仅可以从警察外部产生,而且可以通过法院中被解放的法官的形象从警察机制内部产生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EXCEPTIONS TO LEGALISM BY THE FIGURE OF THE-POLITICAL: A RANCIÈRIAN PHILOSOPHICAL EXTRAPOLATION
This paper analyzes the legal cases, namely Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) and Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka (1954), with the Rancièrian philosophical approach. Those two cases were chosen because it contains controversial legal facts, namely the issue of racial segregation. The court's decision on Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka (1954) has been an important milestone because it does not follow the precedent in Brady v. Ferguson (1896) that has legitimized racial segregation applied publicly through legal policies. This paper concludes that the subject of the political which carries equality as a axiom of politics can not only emerge from outside the police, it can also emerge from within the mechanism the police itself through the figures of the emancipated judges in the court.  
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信