非洲马蹄疫病毒不同pcr检测方法的比较

C. Bremer
{"title":"非洲马蹄疫病毒不同pcr检测方法的比较","authors":"C. Bremer","doi":"10.2174/1874318801206010008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Detection of African horsesickness virus (AHSV) by three different reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) based methods were compared. Primers were complementary to sequences contained in the gene encoding non-structural protein 2 of AHSV serotype 3. All three assays were group-specific for AHSV and detected all nine serotypes but not related orbiviruses. A dilution range was made of titrated chicken embryo-related cells infected with AHSV serotype 3 and, after isolating RNA from each diluted sample they were tested using the three different assays. RNA representing 0.2, 2 and 20 plaque forming units of AHSV could be detected by hemi-nested RT-PCR, PCR- enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (PCR-ELISA) and RT-PCR respectively. In twelve samples from African horsesickness suspect field cases hemi-nested RT-PCR, intra-cerebral injection of mice and virus isolation from cell culture detected AHSV in 83%, 58% and 25% of samples respectively.","PeriodicalId":214092,"journal":{"name":"The Open Veterinary Science Journal","volume":"298 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison of Different PCR-Based Methods for the Detection of African Horsesickness Virus\",\"authors\":\"C. Bremer\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1874318801206010008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Detection of African horsesickness virus (AHSV) by three different reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) based methods were compared. Primers were complementary to sequences contained in the gene encoding non-structural protein 2 of AHSV serotype 3. All three assays were group-specific for AHSV and detected all nine serotypes but not related orbiviruses. A dilution range was made of titrated chicken embryo-related cells infected with AHSV serotype 3 and, after isolating RNA from each diluted sample they were tested using the three different assays. RNA representing 0.2, 2 and 20 plaque forming units of AHSV could be detected by hemi-nested RT-PCR, PCR- enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (PCR-ELISA) and RT-PCR respectively. In twelve samples from African horsesickness suspect field cases hemi-nested RT-PCR, intra-cerebral injection of mice and virus isolation from cell culture detected AHSV in 83%, 58% and 25% of samples respectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":214092,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Open Veterinary Science Journal\",\"volume\":\"298 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Open Veterinary Science Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874318801206010008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open Veterinary Science Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874318801206010008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

比较了三种基于逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)的检测方法对非洲马蹄疫病毒(AHSV)的检测效果。引物与AHSV血清3型非结构蛋白2编码基因序列互补。这三种检测方法均对AHSV具有群体特异性,并检测到所有9种血清型,但未检测到相关的轨道病毒。稀释范围由感染3型AHSV血清型的经滴定的鸡胚相关细胞组成,并在从每个稀释样品中分离RNA后,使用三种不同的检测方法进行测试。半巢式RT-PCR、PCR-酶联免疫吸附法(PCR- elisa)和RT-PCR分别检测到AHSV斑块形成单位为0.2、2和20的RNA。在12份非洲马蹄疫疑似病例样本中,半巢式RT-PCR、小鼠脑内注射和细胞培养病毒分离分别检出83%、58%和25%的AHSV。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparison of Different PCR-Based Methods for the Detection of African Horsesickness Virus
Detection of African horsesickness virus (AHSV) by three different reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) based methods were compared. Primers were complementary to sequences contained in the gene encoding non-structural protein 2 of AHSV serotype 3. All three assays were group-specific for AHSV and detected all nine serotypes but not related orbiviruses. A dilution range was made of titrated chicken embryo-related cells infected with AHSV serotype 3 and, after isolating RNA from each diluted sample they were tested using the three different assays. RNA representing 0.2, 2 and 20 plaque forming units of AHSV could be detected by hemi-nested RT-PCR, PCR- enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (PCR-ELISA) and RT-PCR respectively. In twelve samples from African horsesickness suspect field cases hemi-nested RT-PCR, intra-cerebral injection of mice and virus isolation from cell culture detected AHSV in 83%, 58% and 25% of samples respectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信