{"title":"网络访问控制与软件定义周界的比较研究","authors":"R. Omar, T. Abdelaziz","doi":"10.1145/3410352.3410754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is intended to conduct a comparison between two access control solutions, to determine which is most suitable for the infrastructure of modern computer networks. These two solutions are the software-defined perimeter (SDP) and the traditional network access control (NAC) system. The comparison demonstrates that SDP can enhance the access control process and overcomes security challenges.","PeriodicalId":178037,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Engineering & MIS 2020","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Study of Network Access Control and Software-Defined Perimeter\",\"authors\":\"R. Omar, T. Abdelaziz\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3410352.3410754\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper is intended to conduct a comparison between two access control solutions, to determine which is most suitable for the infrastructure of modern computer networks. These two solutions are the software-defined perimeter (SDP) and the traditional network access control (NAC) system. The comparison demonstrates that SDP can enhance the access control process and overcomes security challenges.\",\"PeriodicalId\":178037,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Engineering & MIS 2020\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Engineering & MIS 2020\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3410352.3410754\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Engineering & MIS 2020","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3410352.3410754","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Comparative Study of Network Access Control and Software-Defined Perimeter
This paper is intended to conduct a comparison between two access control solutions, to determine which is most suitable for the infrastructure of modern computer networks. These two solutions are the software-defined perimeter (SDP) and the traditional network access control (NAC) system. The comparison demonstrates that SDP can enhance the access control process and overcomes security challenges.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
