小学评价:我们要走得更远,还是回到原地?

Rita Makarskaitė-Petkevičienė
{"title":"小学评价:我们要走得更远,还是回到原地?","authors":"Rita Makarskaitė-Petkevičienė","doi":"10.48127/spvk-epmq/19.11.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The topic of a journal editorial article is inspired by the radio programme and discussion in FB groups. Primary school teachers and student parents split into two groups. Some of them are for going back to primary school student achievement evaluation by marks. The others think that descriptive evaluation suits very well for this age students and shows real child’s achievements, individual progress. The latter are sure that Lithuania goes in the right way, the way that progressive Scandinavian countries have chosen. An interview with a primary school teacher-expert, reveals difficulties which primary school teachers encounter evaluating students’ progress. Also, descriptive evaluation necessity is emphasized both for the student and parents, and teacher. \nKeywords: student achievement evaluation, primary school, primary school teachers.","PeriodicalId":115850,"journal":{"name":"ŠVIETIMAS: POLITIKA, VADYBA, KOKYBĖ / EDUCATION POLICY, MANAGEMENT AND QUALITY","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EVALUATION IN PRIMARY SCHOOL: WE WILL GO FURTHER, OR GO BACK TO WHERE WE WERE?\",\"authors\":\"Rita Makarskaitė-Petkevičienė\",\"doi\":\"10.48127/spvk-epmq/19.11.04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The topic of a journal editorial article is inspired by the radio programme and discussion in FB groups. Primary school teachers and student parents split into two groups. Some of them are for going back to primary school student achievement evaluation by marks. The others think that descriptive evaluation suits very well for this age students and shows real child’s achievements, individual progress. The latter are sure that Lithuania goes in the right way, the way that progressive Scandinavian countries have chosen. An interview with a primary school teacher-expert, reveals difficulties which primary school teachers encounter evaluating students’ progress. Also, descriptive evaluation necessity is emphasized both for the student and parents, and teacher. \\nKeywords: student achievement evaluation, primary school, primary school teachers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":115850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ŠVIETIMAS: POLITIKA, VADYBA, KOKYBĖ / EDUCATION POLICY, MANAGEMENT AND QUALITY\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ŠVIETIMAS: POLITIKA, VADYBA, KOKYBĖ / EDUCATION POLICY, MANAGEMENT AND QUALITY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.48127/spvk-epmq/19.11.04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ŠVIETIMAS: POLITIKA, VADYBA, KOKYBĖ / EDUCATION POLICY, MANAGEMENT AND QUALITY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48127/spvk-epmq/19.11.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一篇期刊社论文章的主题是受到广播节目和FB小组讨论的启发。小学老师和学生家长分成两组。其中一些是为了回到小学学生的成绩评价分数。另一些人则认为描述性评价非常适合这个年龄段的学生,能够真实地展示孩子的成就和个人进步。后者确信立陶宛将走正确的道路,走那些进步的斯堪的纳维亚国家所选择的道路。通过对一位小学教师专家的访谈,揭示了小学教师在评估学生进步时遇到的困难。同时,对学生、家长和教师都强调了描述性评价的必要性。关键词:学生成绩评价,小学,小学教师。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EVALUATION IN PRIMARY SCHOOL: WE WILL GO FURTHER, OR GO BACK TO WHERE WE WERE?
The topic of a journal editorial article is inspired by the radio programme and discussion in FB groups. Primary school teachers and student parents split into two groups. Some of them are for going back to primary school student achievement evaluation by marks. The others think that descriptive evaluation suits very well for this age students and shows real child’s achievements, individual progress. The latter are sure that Lithuania goes in the right way, the way that progressive Scandinavian countries have chosen. An interview with a primary school teacher-expert, reveals difficulties which primary school teachers encounter evaluating students’ progress. Also, descriptive evaluation necessity is emphasized both for the student and parents, and teacher. Keywords: student achievement evaluation, primary school, primary school teachers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信