分析学习者在作文功能问题解决上的错误

Susilawati Br Naibaho, C. Laamena, W. Mataheru
{"title":"分析学习者在作文功能问题解决上的错误","authors":"Susilawati Br Naibaho, C. Laamena, W. Mataheru","doi":"10.30598/jpmunpatti.v4.i1.p55-60","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to describe the mistakes of class X students of SMAN 9 Ambon in solving composition function problems. This type of research is qualitative descriptive research. The study was conducted on 3 subjects, each of which was high, medium, and low which was taken based on test results and educators' considerations about students' communication skills. The analysis of student errors is classified according to mathematical objects (facts, concepts, principles, and operations) in using Polya's problem-solving steps. The instruments used in this study test sheets and interview guidelines included the researcher as the main instrument. The results showed that subjects were highly capable of solving the 3 problems given and did not perform indicators of errors of mathematical objects in solving problems. The capable subject is solving 3 questions and performing three indicators of errors in problem solving, namely facts, concepts, and principles. Low-ability subjects solve 3 questions and perform four indicators of errors in problem solving, namely facts, concepts, principles, and operations. From the results of the work and the results of student interviews, mistakes are not only made by low-ability learners or high error subjects, but in high-ability learners or low-error subjects and also medium-capable learners there are still mistakes made in solving problems about composition function","PeriodicalId":293548,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Unpatti","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ANALISIS KESALAHAN PESERTA DIDIK DALAM PEMECAHAN MASALAH FUNGSI KOMPOSISI\",\"authors\":\"Susilawati Br Naibaho, C. Laamena, W. Mataheru\",\"doi\":\"10.30598/jpmunpatti.v4.i1.p55-60\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to describe the mistakes of class X students of SMAN 9 Ambon in solving composition function problems. This type of research is qualitative descriptive research. The study was conducted on 3 subjects, each of which was high, medium, and low which was taken based on test results and educators' considerations about students' communication skills. The analysis of student errors is classified according to mathematical objects (facts, concepts, principles, and operations) in using Polya's problem-solving steps. The instruments used in this study test sheets and interview guidelines included the researcher as the main instrument. The results showed that subjects were highly capable of solving the 3 problems given and did not perform indicators of errors of mathematical objects in solving problems. The capable subject is solving 3 questions and performing three indicators of errors in problem solving, namely facts, concepts, and principles. Low-ability subjects solve 3 questions and perform four indicators of errors in problem solving, namely facts, concepts, principles, and operations. From the results of the work and the results of student interviews, mistakes are not only made by low-ability learners or high error subjects, but in high-ability learners or low-error subjects and also medium-capable learners there are still mistakes made in solving problems about composition function\",\"PeriodicalId\":293548,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Unpatti\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Unpatti\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30598/jpmunpatti.v4.i1.p55-60\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Unpatti","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30598/jpmunpatti.v4.i1.p55-60","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在描述SMAN 9 Ambon X班学生在解决组合函数问题时的错误。这种类型的研究是定性描述性研究。这项研究分为高、中、低三个科目,根据测试结果和教育者对学生沟通能力的考虑来进行。在使用Polya的问题解决步骤时,根据数学对象(事实、概念、原理和操作)对学生错误进行分析。在本研究中使用的工具测试表和访谈指南包括研究者作为主要工具。结果表明,被试解题能力较强,未表现出数学对象解题误差指标。有能力的主体是解决3个问题,并执行解决问题的三个错误指标,即事实、概念和原则。低能力被试解决了3个问题,并在解决问题时出现了事实、概念、原则和操作4个错误指标。从工作结果和学生访谈结果来看,不仅是低能力学习者或高错误科目出现错误,高能力学习者或低错误科目以及中等能力学习者在解决作文函数问题时也存在错误
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ANALISIS KESALAHAN PESERTA DIDIK DALAM PEMECAHAN MASALAH FUNGSI KOMPOSISI
This study aims to describe the mistakes of class X students of SMAN 9 Ambon in solving composition function problems. This type of research is qualitative descriptive research. The study was conducted on 3 subjects, each of which was high, medium, and low which was taken based on test results and educators' considerations about students' communication skills. The analysis of student errors is classified according to mathematical objects (facts, concepts, principles, and operations) in using Polya's problem-solving steps. The instruments used in this study test sheets and interview guidelines included the researcher as the main instrument. The results showed that subjects were highly capable of solving the 3 problems given and did not perform indicators of errors of mathematical objects in solving problems. The capable subject is solving 3 questions and performing three indicators of errors in problem solving, namely facts, concepts, and principles. Low-ability subjects solve 3 questions and perform four indicators of errors in problem solving, namely facts, concepts, principles, and operations. From the results of the work and the results of student interviews, mistakes are not only made by low-ability learners or high error subjects, but in high-ability learners or low-error subjects and also medium-capable learners there are still mistakes made in solving problems about composition function
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信