修改已故供肾移植中KONOS边缘供者标准的初步研究

W. Huh
{"title":"修改已故供肾移植中KONOS边缘供者标准的初步研究","authors":"W. Huh","doi":"10.4285/JKSTN.2017.31.2.59","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The Korean Network for Organ Sharing (KONOS), which was established in December 31st, 1999, is a nationwide system of deceased donor detection and distribution. From its inception, KONOS has defined marginal donors and used this definition for over 15 years. However, this definition should be reevaluated to determine if it requires revision. This study was conducted to confirm the feasibility of the main study for revision of the marginal donor definition in deceased donor kidney transplantation. Methods: This study is a retrospective meta-analysis of 786 patients who had deceased donor kidney transplant from six centers. After the data validation process, multivariable analysis was conducted to evaluate whether the marginal donor criteria of KONOS or UNOS expected adequately in terms of graft survival and delayed graft function (DGF). Results: Neither the KONOS or UNOS criteria affected graft survival. Expanded criteria for donors of UNOS was a risk factor for DGF. However, KONOS criteria did not affect DGF. Conclusions: Based on this preliminary study, there is a need to conduct a study to revise the marginal donor criteria of KONOS in deceased donor kidney transplantation. Such a study should have large scale and long-term follow-up data.","PeriodicalId":420886,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of The Korean Society for Transplantation","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Preliminary Study to Revise the Marginal Donor Criteria of KONOS in Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation\",\"authors\":\"W. Huh\",\"doi\":\"10.4285/JKSTN.2017.31.2.59\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The Korean Network for Organ Sharing (KONOS), which was established in December 31st, 1999, is a nationwide system of deceased donor detection and distribution. From its inception, KONOS has defined marginal donors and used this definition for over 15 years. However, this definition should be reevaluated to determine if it requires revision. This study was conducted to confirm the feasibility of the main study for revision of the marginal donor definition in deceased donor kidney transplantation. Methods: This study is a retrospective meta-analysis of 786 patients who had deceased donor kidney transplant from six centers. After the data validation process, multivariable analysis was conducted to evaluate whether the marginal donor criteria of KONOS or UNOS expected adequately in terms of graft survival and delayed graft function (DGF). Results: Neither the KONOS or UNOS criteria affected graft survival. Expanded criteria for donors of UNOS was a risk factor for DGF. However, KONOS criteria did not affect DGF. Conclusions: Based on this preliminary study, there is a need to conduct a study to revise the marginal donor criteria of KONOS in deceased donor kidney transplantation. Such a study should have large scale and long-term follow-up data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":420886,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of The Korean Society for Transplantation\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of The Korean Society for Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4285/JKSTN.2017.31.2.59\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of The Korean Society for Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4285/JKSTN.2017.31.2.59","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:韩国器官共享网络(KONOS)成立于1999年12月31日,是一个全国性的已故捐献者检测和分配系统。从一开始,KONOS就定义了边际捐助者,并使用这一定义超过15年。然而,这个定义应该重新评估,以确定是否需要修订。本研究的目的是为了确认修改已故供者肾移植的边缘供者定义的可行性。方法:本研究对来自6个中心的786例已故供体肾移植患者进行回顾性荟萃分析。在数据验证过程后,进行多变量分析,以评估KONOS或UNOS的边际供者标准在移植物存活和延迟移植物功能(DGF)方面是否充分预期。结果:KONOS和UNOS标准均不影响移植物存活。扩大对联合国人道主义援助系统捐助者的标准是DGF的一个危险因素。然而,KONOS标准不影响DGF。结论:在本初步研究的基础上,有必要对死亡供肾移植中KONOS的边际供者标准进行修订研究。这样的研究应该有大规模和长期的随访数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Preliminary Study to Revise the Marginal Donor Criteria of KONOS in Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation
Background: The Korean Network for Organ Sharing (KONOS), which was established in December 31st, 1999, is a nationwide system of deceased donor detection and distribution. From its inception, KONOS has defined marginal donors and used this definition for over 15 years. However, this definition should be reevaluated to determine if it requires revision. This study was conducted to confirm the feasibility of the main study for revision of the marginal donor definition in deceased donor kidney transplantation. Methods: This study is a retrospective meta-analysis of 786 patients who had deceased donor kidney transplant from six centers. After the data validation process, multivariable analysis was conducted to evaluate whether the marginal donor criteria of KONOS or UNOS expected adequately in terms of graft survival and delayed graft function (DGF). Results: Neither the KONOS or UNOS criteria affected graft survival. Expanded criteria for donors of UNOS was a risk factor for DGF. However, KONOS criteria did not affect DGF. Conclusions: Based on this preliminary study, there is a need to conduct a study to revise the marginal donor criteria of KONOS in deceased donor kidney transplantation. Such a study should have large scale and long-term follow-up data.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信