基于物理过程建模的光掩模线宽参考的设置

Rui Hu, Qiang Wu
{"title":"基于物理过程建模的光掩模线宽参考的设置","authors":"Rui Hu, Qiang Wu","doi":"10.1109/CSTIC52283.2021.9461528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of photomask can maximally realize the power of parallel pattern replication in photolithography. Although there exists linewidth standard in the metrology tools, in practice, there may exists some variation in the linewidth definition from different chip makers. Experience indicates that such variation can be as much as 1~2 nm (1X). Since the mask bias can affect photo process window, the determination of which can be very important to the setup of the lithography process. Of course, the optimum setting can be obtained through wafer exposure. However, ever since the introduction of Model Based Optical Proximity Correction (MBOPC), the linewidth uniformity across different patterns is mostly accomplished by OPC model and correction. Therefore, it is important that the mask dimension be as close to the reality as possible to make OPC model more physical, which have better extendibility to patterns that may lie along the edge of the design rules or even slightly outside the design rules. Ever since the use of 193 nm immersion lithography, the mask dimension may be very close to the size of the wavelength, mask 3D scattering effect becomes very significant, which can reduce imaging contrast, increase Mask Error Factor (MEF), and reduce common Depth of Focus (DoF) for all patterns. The setting of the accurate mask dimension becomes more important, even critical. However, we can also utilize this process window sensitivity to the mask dimension to determine the real mask dimension through comparing wafer exposure data and simulation. This will require very accurate physical modeling. In this paper, we will propose this method.","PeriodicalId":186529,"journal":{"name":"2021 China Semiconductor Technology International Conference (CSTIC)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Setting of Linewidth Reference on Photomasks through Physical Process Modeling\",\"authors\":\"Rui Hu, Qiang Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CSTIC52283.2021.9461528\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The use of photomask can maximally realize the power of parallel pattern replication in photolithography. Although there exists linewidth standard in the metrology tools, in practice, there may exists some variation in the linewidth definition from different chip makers. Experience indicates that such variation can be as much as 1~2 nm (1X). Since the mask bias can affect photo process window, the determination of which can be very important to the setup of the lithography process. Of course, the optimum setting can be obtained through wafer exposure. However, ever since the introduction of Model Based Optical Proximity Correction (MBOPC), the linewidth uniformity across different patterns is mostly accomplished by OPC model and correction. Therefore, it is important that the mask dimension be as close to the reality as possible to make OPC model more physical, which have better extendibility to patterns that may lie along the edge of the design rules or even slightly outside the design rules. Ever since the use of 193 nm immersion lithography, the mask dimension may be very close to the size of the wavelength, mask 3D scattering effect becomes very significant, which can reduce imaging contrast, increase Mask Error Factor (MEF), and reduce common Depth of Focus (DoF) for all patterns. The setting of the accurate mask dimension becomes more important, even critical. However, we can also utilize this process window sensitivity to the mask dimension to determine the real mask dimension through comparing wafer exposure data and simulation. This will require very accurate physical modeling. In this paper, we will propose this method.\",\"PeriodicalId\":186529,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 China Semiconductor Technology International Conference (CSTIC)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 China Semiconductor Technology International Conference (CSTIC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSTIC52283.2021.9461528\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 China Semiconductor Technology International Conference (CSTIC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSTIC52283.2021.9461528","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

光掩膜的使用可以最大限度地实现光刻中平行图案复制的能力。虽然在计量工具中存在线宽标准,但在实际应用中,不同芯片厂商对线宽的定义可能存在一定的差异。经验表明,这种变化可达1~ 2nm (1X)。由于掩模偏置会影响光刻工艺窗口,因此确定掩模偏置对光刻工艺的设置非常重要。当然,最佳设置可以通过圆片曝光获得。然而,自基于模型的光学接近校正(MBOPC)引入以来,不同模式之间的线宽均匀性主要是通过OPC模型和校正来实现的。因此,为了使OPC模型更加物理化,掩码维度尽可能接近现实是很重要的,这样可以更好地扩展到可能位于设计规则边缘甚至稍微超出设计规则的模式。自从采用193nm浸没光刻技术以来,掩模尺寸可能非常接近波长的尺寸,掩模3D散射效应变得非常显著,从而降低了成像对比度,增加了掩模误差系数(MEF),降低了所有图案的共焦深度(DoF)。准确的掩模尺寸的设置变得更加重要,甚至至关重要。然而,我们也可以利用这个过程窗口对掩模尺寸的灵敏度,通过比较晶圆曝光数据和模拟来确定真实的掩模尺寸。这需要非常精确的物理建模。在本文中,我们将提出这种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Setting of Linewidth Reference on Photomasks through Physical Process Modeling
The use of photomask can maximally realize the power of parallel pattern replication in photolithography. Although there exists linewidth standard in the metrology tools, in practice, there may exists some variation in the linewidth definition from different chip makers. Experience indicates that such variation can be as much as 1~2 nm (1X). Since the mask bias can affect photo process window, the determination of which can be very important to the setup of the lithography process. Of course, the optimum setting can be obtained through wafer exposure. However, ever since the introduction of Model Based Optical Proximity Correction (MBOPC), the linewidth uniformity across different patterns is mostly accomplished by OPC model and correction. Therefore, it is important that the mask dimension be as close to the reality as possible to make OPC model more physical, which have better extendibility to patterns that may lie along the edge of the design rules or even slightly outside the design rules. Ever since the use of 193 nm immersion lithography, the mask dimension may be very close to the size of the wavelength, mask 3D scattering effect becomes very significant, which can reduce imaging contrast, increase Mask Error Factor (MEF), and reduce common Depth of Focus (DoF) for all patterns. The setting of the accurate mask dimension becomes more important, even critical. However, we can also utilize this process window sensitivity to the mask dimension to determine the real mask dimension through comparing wafer exposure data and simulation. This will require very accurate physical modeling. In this paper, we will propose this method.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信