同种异体骨环与自体骨环在上颌美观区即刻种植体植入与脊隆术的比较

Mithaq A. Nasser, Nesma M. El-Gohary, M. Haggag, Wael M. Ahmed
{"title":"同种异体骨环与自体骨环在上颌美观区即刻种植体植入与脊隆术的比较","authors":"Mithaq A. Nasser, Nesma M. El-Gohary, M. Haggag, Wael M. Ahmed","doi":"10.21608/mjd.2023.301968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Objective: To evaluate allogeneic versus autogenous bone rings (harvested from the chin) for ridge augmentation the of maxillary esthetic zone simultaneously with implant placement. Materials and Methods: This randomized clinical trial included 14 patients who were seeking implant rehabilitation of partially edentulous atrophic ridge the in the esthetic zone. The patients were randomly and equally divided into two groups; immediate implants were placed simultaneously with each autogenous bone ring from chin group I (control group) and, with allogenic bone ring group II (study group). The evaluation was done immediately (T0), postoperatively at 1 month (T1), at 3 months (T3), and after 6 months (T6) to assess implant stability, soft tissue healing, relative buccal bone volume, and bone gain and bone loss around the dental implant. Results: The fourteen patients were randomly divided into two groups; 3 females and 4 males in group I and 2 females and 5 males in group II. Their ages ranged between18 to 45 years old with the mean age of both groups 31 years, standard deviation was 31.0+- 10.65 for group I and 31.0+-11.69 for group II. No statistically significant differences were found between both groups in implant stability, soft tissue healing, bone density, relative buccal bone volume, and buccal bone gain but the bone loss was higher in group I than group II with a statistically significant difference between them (1.61mm 2 versus 1.21 mm 2 ). Conclusions : The bone ring approach either allogenic or autogenous reduces treatment time for restoring function and aesthetics even in the severely atrophied alveolar bone.","PeriodicalId":308616,"journal":{"name":"Mansoura Journal of Dentistry","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Immediate Implant Placement Simultaneously with Ridge Augmentation in the Maxillary Esthetic Region Using Allograft versus Autogenous Bone Rings\",\"authors\":\"Mithaq A. Nasser, Nesma M. El-Gohary, M. Haggag, Wael M. Ahmed\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/mjd.2023.301968\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": Objective: To evaluate allogeneic versus autogenous bone rings (harvested from the chin) for ridge augmentation the of maxillary esthetic zone simultaneously with implant placement. Materials and Methods: This randomized clinical trial included 14 patients who were seeking implant rehabilitation of partially edentulous atrophic ridge the in the esthetic zone. The patients were randomly and equally divided into two groups; immediate implants were placed simultaneously with each autogenous bone ring from chin group I (control group) and, with allogenic bone ring group II (study group). The evaluation was done immediately (T0), postoperatively at 1 month (T1), at 3 months (T3), and after 6 months (T6) to assess implant stability, soft tissue healing, relative buccal bone volume, and bone gain and bone loss around the dental implant. Results: The fourteen patients were randomly divided into two groups; 3 females and 4 males in group I and 2 females and 5 males in group II. Their ages ranged between18 to 45 years old with the mean age of both groups 31 years, standard deviation was 31.0+- 10.65 for group I and 31.0+-11.69 for group II. No statistically significant differences were found between both groups in implant stability, soft tissue healing, bone density, relative buccal bone volume, and buccal bone gain but the bone loss was higher in group I than group II with a statistically significant difference between them (1.61mm 2 versus 1.21 mm 2 ). Conclusions : The bone ring approach either allogenic or autogenous reduces treatment time for restoring function and aesthetics even in the severely atrophied alveolar bone.\",\"PeriodicalId\":308616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mansoura Journal of Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mansoura Journal of Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/mjd.2023.301968\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mansoura Journal of Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/mjd.2023.301968","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价同种异体骨环与自体骨环在上颌美观区隆脊与种植体同时植入的效果。材料与方法:本随机临床试验纳入14例寻求种植体修复部分无牙萎缩脊的患者。患者随机平均分为两组;即刻种植体同时放置来自下巴的自体骨环组I(对照组)和异体骨环组II(研究组)。即刻(T0)、术后1个月(T1)、3个月(T3)和6个月(T6)分别进行评估,以评估种植体稳定性、软组织愈合、相对颊骨体积、种植体周围骨增和骨损失。结果:14例患者随机分为两组;第一组3女4男,第二组2女5男。年龄18 ~ 45岁,两组平均年龄31岁,标准差分别为31.0+- 10.65组和31.0+-11.69组。两组在种植体稳定性、软组织愈合、骨密度、相对颊骨体积、颊骨增重等方面差异无统计学意义,但骨损失I组高于II组,差异有统计学意义(1.61mm 2 vs 1.21 mm 2)。结论:对于严重萎缩的牙槽骨,同种异体骨环入路或自体骨环入路均可减少恢复功能和美观的治疗时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Immediate Implant Placement Simultaneously with Ridge Augmentation in the Maxillary Esthetic Region Using Allograft versus Autogenous Bone Rings
: Objective: To evaluate allogeneic versus autogenous bone rings (harvested from the chin) for ridge augmentation the of maxillary esthetic zone simultaneously with implant placement. Materials and Methods: This randomized clinical trial included 14 patients who were seeking implant rehabilitation of partially edentulous atrophic ridge the in the esthetic zone. The patients were randomly and equally divided into two groups; immediate implants were placed simultaneously with each autogenous bone ring from chin group I (control group) and, with allogenic bone ring group II (study group). The evaluation was done immediately (T0), postoperatively at 1 month (T1), at 3 months (T3), and after 6 months (T6) to assess implant stability, soft tissue healing, relative buccal bone volume, and bone gain and bone loss around the dental implant. Results: The fourteen patients were randomly divided into two groups; 3 females and 4 males in group I and 2 females and 5 males in group II. Their ages ranged between18 to 45 years old with the mean age of both groups 31 years, standard deviation was 31.0+- 10.65 for group I and 31.0+-11.69 for group II. No statistically significant differences were found between both groups in implant stability, soft tissue healing, bone density, relative buccal bone volume, and buccal bone gain but the bone loss was higher in group I than group II with a statistically significant difference between them (1.61mm 2 versus 1.21 mm 2 ). Conclusions : The bone ring approach either allogenic or autogenous reduces treatment time for restoring function and aesthetics even in the severely atrophied alveolar bone.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信