收入不平等:教育是万能药

Nugraheni Kusumaningsih
{"title":"收入不平等:教育是万能药","authors":"Nugraheni Kusumaningsih","doi":"10.31685/kek.v18i3.30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Indonesian government has already allocated 20 percent from its budget every year for education. Therefore, it's profound to know whether the budget spent on education is giving significant return. The paper aims to examine the rate of return to education, whether there's a disparity between rate of return to education between females and males, and whether education can help tighten the gap of income inequality which is a crucial issue these days facing emerging countries. This paper is using Mincer Equation as the model and Indonesian Family Life Survey (IFLS), a panel data from Indonesian households, finding the rate of return to education to be 7.5 percent. Interesting finding coming from return to education for females to be not different from males, given that return to education for females usually higher than males, though disparity tends to get smaller over time. In addition, it is found that education is not widening the gap of inequality though we can't say whether income equalizing process through education really occurs except for female case, it is income equalizing. This finding is crucial showing that the government should pay more focus in educating females as a means to tighten the income inequality gap.","PeriodicalId":426920,"journal":{"name":"Kajian Ekonomi dan Keuangan","volume":"5 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"INCOME INEQUALITY: EDUCATION AS THE PANACEA\",\"authors\":\"Nugraheni Kusumaningsih\",\"doi\":\"10.31685/kek.v18i3.30\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Indonesian government has already allocated 20 percent from its budget every year for education. Therefore, it's profound to know whether the budget spent on education is giving significant return. The paper aims to examine the rate of return to education, whether there's a disparity between rate of return to education between females and males, and whether education can help tighten the gap of income inequality which is a crucial issue these days facing emerging countries. This paper is using Mincer Equation as the model and Indonesian Family Life Survey (IFLS), a panel data from Indonesian households, finding the rate of return to education to be 7.5 percent. Interesting finding coming from return to education for females to be not different from males, given that return to education for females usually higher than males, though disparity tends to get smaller over time. In addition, it is found that education is not widening the gap of inequality though we can't say whether income equalizing process through education really occurs except for female case, it is income equalizing. This finding is crucial showing that the government should pay more focus in educating females as a means to tighten the income inequality gap.\",\"PeriodicalId\":426920,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kajian Ekonomi dan Keuangan\",\"volume\":\"5 1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kajian Ekonomi dan Keuangan\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31685/kek.v18i3.30\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kajian Ekonomi dan Keuangan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31685/kek.v18i3.30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

印尼政府每年将预算的20%用于教育。因此,教育预算是否获得了可观的回报是一个很有意义的问题。本文旨在考察教育回报率,女性和男性之间的教育回报率是否存在差异,以及教育是否有助于缩小收入不平等的差距,这是当今新兴国家面临的一个关键问题。本文采用Mincer方程作为模型,并采用印度尼西亚家庭生活调查(IFLS),这是印度尼西亚家庭的面板数据,发现教育回报率为7.5%。有趣的是,考虑到女性的教育回报率通常高于男性,尽管随着时间的推移,差距往往会变小,但女性的教育回报率与男性并没有什么不同。此外,我们发现教育并没有扩大不平等的差距,虽然我们不能说教育是否真的发生了收入平等的过程,除了女性的情况,这是收入平等。这一发现至关重要,表明政府应该更加关注女性教育,以此作为缩小收入不平等差距的一种手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
INCOME INEQUALITY: EDUCATION AS THE PANACEA
The Indonesian government has already allocated 20 percent from its budget every year for education. Therefore, it's profound to know whether the budget spent on education is giving significant return. The paper aims to examine the rate of return to education, whether there's a disparity between rate of return to education between females and males, and whether education can help tighten the gap of income inequality which is a crucial issue these days facing emerging countries. This paper is using Mincer Equation as the model and Indonesian Family Life Survey (IFLS), a panel data from Indonesian households, finding the rate of return to education to be 7.5 percent. Interesting finding coming from return to education for females to be not different from males, given that return to education for females usually higher than males, though disparity tends to get smaller over time. In addition, it is found that education is not widening the gap of inequality though we can't say whether income equalizing process through education really occurs except for female case, it is income equalizing. This finding is crucial showing that the government should pay more focus in educating females as a means to tighten the income inequality gap.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信