特殊准入规则的败诉

Larry Downes
{"title":"特殊准入规则的败诉","authors":"Larry Downes","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2709799","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1999, the FCC largely deregulated middle-mile or \"special access\" enterprise communications services, resulting in explosive growth of new competitors using new technologies, including cable, fiber-optics, and high-speed Ethernet loops. But in recent years the agency has expressed increased interest in re-regulating not only the legacy carriers but the new entrants as well. A multi-year data collection effort to evaluate competitive conditions in the market has stalled, further demonstrating the poor match between the FCC's pace and that of the market. This paper argues that the agency's blundering has had the unintended consequence of interfering with the healthy evolution of special access -- precisely the opposite result desired by all parties involved.","PeriodicalId":238624,"journal":{"name":"IRPN: Governance (Sub-Topic)","volume":"102 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Losing Case for Special Access Regulation\",\"authors\":\"Larry Downes\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2709799\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 1999, the FCC largely deregulated middle-mile or \\\"special access\\\" enterprise communications services, resulting in explosive growth of new competitors using new technologies, including cable, fiber-optics, and high-speed Ethernet loops. But in recent years the agency has expressed increased interest in re-regulating not only the legacy carriers but the new entrants as well. A multi-year data collection effort to evaluate competitive conditions in the market has stalled, further demonstrating the poor match between the FCC's pace and that of the market. This paper argues that the agency's blundering has had the unintended consequence of interfering with the healthy evolution of special access -- precisely the opposite result desired by all parties involved.\",\"PeriodicalId\":238624,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IRPN: Governance (Sub-Topic)\",\"volume\":\"102 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IRPN: Governance (Sub-Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2709799\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IRPN: Governance (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2709799","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1999年,联邦通信委员会在很大程度上放松了对中间里程或“特殊通道”企业通信服务的管制,导致使用新技术的新竞争者爆炸式增长,包括电缆、光纤和高速以太网环路。但近年来,该机构表达了越来越大的兴趣,不仅要重新监管传统运营商,也要重新监管新进入者。多年来评估市场竞争状况的数据收集工作停滞不前,进一步表明FCC的步伐与市场的步伐不匹配。本文认为,该机构的鲁莽已经产生了意想不到的后果,即干扰了特殊准入的健康发展——恰恰与所有相关各方所希望的结果相反。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Losing Case for Special Access Regulation
In 1999, the FCC largely deregulated middle-mile or "special access" enterprise communications services, resulting in explosive growth of new competitors using new technologies, including cable, fiber-optics, and high-speed Ethernet loops. But in recent years the agency has expressed increased interest in re-regulating not only the legacy carriers but the new entrants as well. A multi-year data collection effort to evaluate competitive conditions in the market has stalled, further demonstrating the poor match between the FCC's pace and that of the market. This paper argues that the agency's blundering has had the unintended consequence of interfering with the healthy evolution of special access -- precisely the opposite result desired by all parties involved.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信