法律对经济系统运行的影响

Ling Bin
{"title":"法律对经济系统运行的影响","authors":"Ling Bin","doi":"10.5235/205174814814222522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The lasting dispute aroused by the Coase Theorem requires a reflection on and a clarification of the functions of the law in the Theorem. The legal delimitation of rights in the Coase Theorem has dual functions: the prerequisite of market and the substitute of market. A fundamental confusion between these two functions not only leads to the wrong inference that law should interfere with the working of the market given positive transaction costs, but also overlooks the existence of delimitation costs, which makes it hard to use the theorem to explain the influences of legal delimitation of rights on efficiency.","PeriodicalId":108655,"journal":{"name":"Peking University Law Journal","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Influences of the Law on the Working of the Economic System\",\"authors\":\"Ling Bin\",\"doi\":\"10.5235/205174814814222522\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The lasting dispute aroused by the Coase Theorem requires a reflection on and a clarification of the functions of the law in the Theorem. The legal delimitation of rights in the Coase Theorem has dual functions: the prerequisite of market and the substitute of market. A fundamental confusion between these two functions not only leads to the wrong inference that law should interfere with the working of the market given positive transaction costs, but also overlooks the existence of delimitation costs, which makes it hard to use the theorem to explain the influences of legal delimitation of rights on efficiency.\",\"PeriodicalId\":108655,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Peking University Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Peking University Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5235/205174814814222522\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Peking University Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5235/205174814814222522","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

科斯定理所引起的持久争论要求我们反思和澄清法在科斯定理中的作用。科斯定理中的法律权利界定具有市场的前提和市场的替代双重功能。这两种功能的根本混淆不仅导致了在交易成本为正的情况下法律应当干预市场运作的错误推论,而且忽视了划界成本的存在,使得难以用该定理来解释法律划界对效率的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Influences of the Law on the Working of the Economic System
The lasting dispute aroused by the Coase Theorem requires a reflection on and a clarification of the functions of the law in the Theorem. The legal delimitation of rights in the Coase Theorem has dual functions: the prerequisite of market and the substitute of market. A fundamental confusion between these two functions not only leads to the wrong inference that law should interfere with the working of the market given positive transaction costs, but also overlooks the existence of delimitation costs, which makes it hard to use the theorem to explain the influences of legal delimitation of rights on efficiency.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信