市场差异会影响网络消费者的行为吗?在线电影评论在不同市场的有效性调查

An Han, Ren Ji-Fan
{"title":"市场差异会影响网络消费者的行为吗?在线电影评论在不同市场的有效性调查","authors":"An Han, Ren Ji-Fan","doi":"10.1109/ICMSE.2017.8574408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to investigate how does market differences influence consumers' behavior when reading online reviews. To this end, we propose a conceptual model from the perspective of content quality and source quality to explore the determinants of review helpfulness. We unravel that consumers' rating behaviors show differences in different movie markets. Using reviews data from IMDB.com and douban.com, we apply linear models to examine the cultural differences. The results demonstrate that there are significant differences across two different movie markets (China and US). Specifically, online reviews length, review extremity, reviewer centrality and reviewer experience have signal positive impact on usefulness of movie reviews. We found that long sentences and extreme sensibility can be more persuasive in individualist societies (US) than collectivist societies (China); while the effects of reviewer centrality and reviewer experience to review usefulness are inclined to be same in two markets. The findings give a better understanding of online reviewer behaviors across different markets and provide important insights into emerging movie markets such as China.","PeriodicalId":275033,"journal":{"name":"2017 International Conference on Management Science and Engineering (ICMSE)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do Market Differences Influence Online Consumer's Behavior? An Investigation of Online Movie Reviews Usefulness Across Markets\",\"authors\":\"An Han, Ren Ji-Fan\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICMSE.2017.8574408\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper aims to investigate how does market differences influence consumers' behavior when reading online reviews. To this end, we propose a conceptual model from the perspective of content quality and source quality to explore the determinants of review helpfulness. We unravel that consumers' rating behaviors show differences in different movie markets. Using reviews data from IMDB.com and douban.com, we apply linear models to examine the cultural differences. The results demonstrate that there are significant differences across two different movie markets (China and US). Specifically, online reviews length, review extremity, reviewer centrality and reviewer experience have signal positive impact on usefulness of movie reviews. We found that long sentences and extreme sensibility can be more persuasive in individualist societies (US) than collectivist societies (China); while the effects of reviewer centrality and reviewer experience to review usefulness are inclined to be same in two markets. The findings give a better understanding of online reviewer behaviors across different markets and provide important insights into emerging movie markets such as China.\",\"PeriodicalId\":275033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 International Conference on Management Science and Engineering (ICMSE)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 International Conference on Management Science and Engineering (ICMSE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMSE.2017.8574408\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 International Conference on Management Science and Engineering (ICMSE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMSE.2017.8574408","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文旨在探讨市场差异如何影响消费者在阅读在线评论时的行为。为此,我们从内容质量和来源质量的角度提出了一个概念模型来探讨评论有用性的决定因素。我们揭示了消费者的评分行为在不同的电影市场表现出差异。使用来自imdb和豆瓣的评论数据,我们运用线性模型来检验文化差异。结果表明,在两个不同的电影市场(中国和美国)之间存在显著差异。其中,影评长度、影评极端化、影评中心性和影评体验对影评有用性有显著的正向影响。我们发现,在个人主义社会(美国),长句和极端情感比集体主义社会(中国)更有说服力;而审稿人中心性和审稿人经验对审稿人有用性的影响在两个市场中趋于相同。这些发现有助于更好地了解不同市场的在线评论行为,并为中国等新兴电影市场提供重要见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do Market Differences Influence Online Consumer's Behavior? An Investigation of Online Movie Reviews Usefulness Across Markets
This paper aims to investigate how does market differences influence consumers' behavior when reading online reviews. To this end, we propose a conceptual model from the perspective of content quality and source quality to explore the determinants of review helpfulness. We unravel that consumers' rating behaviors show differences in different movie markets. Using reviews data from IMDB.com and douban.com, we apply linear models to examine the cultural differences. The results demonstrate that there are significant differences across two different movie markets (China and US). Specifically, online reviews length, review extremity, reviewer centrality and reviewer experience have signal positive impact on usefulness of movie reviews. We found that long sentences and extreme sensibility can be more persuasive in individualist societies (US) than collectivist societies (China); while the effects of reviewer centrality and reviewer experience to review usefulness are inclined to be same in two markets. The findings give a better understanding of online reviewer behaviors across different markets and provide important insights into emerging movie markets such as China.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信