词源语义学上的复数

D. Lahm
{"title":"词源语义学上的复数","authors":"D. Lahm","doi":"10.21248/hpsg.2018.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe paper shows how the plural semantic\nideas of (Sternefeld, 1998) can be captured in Lexical Resource\nSemantics, a system of underspecied semantics. It is argued that\nSternefeld's original approach, which allows for the unrestricted\ninsertion of pluralisation into Logical Form, suffers from a problem\noriginally pointed out by Lasersohn (1989) with respect to the analysis\noffered by Gillon (1987). The problem is shown to stem from repeated\npluralisation of the same verbal argument and to be amenable to a\nsimple solution in the proposed lexical analysis, which allows for\nrestricting the pluralisations that can be inserted. The paper further\ndevelops an account of maximalisation of pluralities as needed to\nobtain the correct readings for sentences with quantiers that are not\nupward monotone. Such an account is absent in the orginal system in\n(Sternefeld, 1998). The present account makes crucial use of the\npossibility to have distinct constituents contribute identical semantic\nmaterial offered by LRS and employs it in an analysis of maximalisation\nin terms of polyadic quantication.","PeriodicalId":388937,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Plural in lexical resourcesemantics\",\"authors\":\"D. Lahm\",\"doi\":\"10.21248/hpsg.2018.6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nThe paper shows how the plural semantic\\nideas of (Sternefeld, 1998) can be captured in Lexical Resource\\nSemantics, a system of underspecied semantics. It is argued that\\nSternefeld's original approach, which allows for the unrestricted\\ninsertion of pluralisation into Logical Form, suffers from a problem\\noriginally pointed out by Lasersohn (1989) with respect to the analysis\\noffered by Gillon (1987). The problem is shown to stem from repeated\\npluralisation of the same verbal argument and to be amenable to a\\nsimple solution in the proposed lexical analysis, which allows for\\nrestricting the pluralisations that can be inserted. The paper further\\ndevelops an account of maximalisation of pluralities as needed to\\nobtain the correct readings for sentences with quantiers that are not\\nupward monotone. Such an account is absent in the orginal system in\\n(Sternefeld, 1998). The present account makes crucial use of the\\npossibility to have distinct constituents contribute identical semantic\\nmaterial offered by LRS and employs it in an analysis of maximalisation\\nin terms of polyadic quantication.\",\"PeriodicalId\":388937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21248/hpsg.2018.6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21248/hpsg.2018.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文展示了(Sternefeld, 1998)的复数语义概念如何在Lexical ResourceSemantics(一个未指定语义的系统)中被捕获。有人认为,斯特恩菲尔德的原始方法,允许不受限制地将多元化插入逻辑形式,受到Lasersohn(1989)最初针对Gillon(1987)提供的分析所指出的问题的困扰。该问题源于同一口头论点的重复复数,并且在提出的词法分析中可以采用简单的解决方案,该方法允许限制可以插入的复数。本文进一步发展了一种必要的最大化复数的解释,以获得具有非向上单调量词的句子的正确读数。在(Sternefeld, 1998)的原始系统中没有这样的帐户。本帐户至关重要地利用了由LRS提供的不同成分贡献相同语义材料的可能性,并将其用于多进量化的最大化分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Plural in lexical resourcesemantics
The paper shows how the plural semantic ideas of (Sternefeld, 1998) can be captured in Lexical Resource Semantics, a system of underspecied semantics. It is argued that Sternefeld's original approach, which allows for the unrestricted insertion of pluralisation into Logical Form, suffers from a problem originally pointed out by Lasersohn (1989) with respect to the analysis offered by Gillon (1987). The problem is shown to stem from repeated pluralisation of the same verbal argument and to be amenable to a simple solution in the proposed lexical analysis, which allows for restricting the pluralisations that can be inserted. The paper further develops an account of maximalisation of pluralities as needed to obtain the correct readings for sentences with quantiers that are not upward monotone. Such an account is absent in the orginal system in (Sternefeld, 1998). The present account makes crucial use of the possibility to have distinct constituents contribute identical semantic material offered by LRS and employs it in an analysis of maximalisation in terms of polyadic quantication.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信