{"title":"词源语义学上的复数","authors":"D. Lahm","doi":"10.21248/hpsg.2018.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe paper shows how the plural semantic\nideas of (Sternefeld, 1998) can be captured in Lexical Resource\nSemantics, a system of underspecied semantics. It is argued that\nSternefeld's original approach, which allows for the unrestricted\ninsertion of pluralisation into Logical Form, suffers from a problem\noriginally pointed out by Lasersohn (1989) with respect to the analysis\noffered by Gillon (1987). The problem is shown to stem from repeated\npluralisation of the same verbal argument and to be amenable to a\nsimple solution in the proposed lexical analysis, which allows for\nrestricting the pluralisations that can be inserted. The paper further\ndevelops an account of maximalisation of pluralities as needed to\nobtain the correct readings for sentences with quantiers that are not\nupward monotone. Such an account is absent in the orginal system in\n(Sternefeld, 1998). The present account makes crucial use of the\npossibility to have distinct constituents contribute identical semantic\nmaterial offered by LRS and employs it in an analysis of maximalisation\nin terms of polyadic quantication.","PeriodicalId":388937,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Plural in lexical resourcesemantics\",\"authors\":\"D. Lahm\",\"doi\":\"10.21248/hpsg.2018.6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nThe paper shows how the plural semantic\\nideas of (Sternefeld, 1998) can be captured in Lexical Resource\\nSemantics, a system of underspecied semantics. It is argued that\\nSternefeld's original approach, which allows for the unrestricted\\ninsertion of pluralisation into Logical Form, suffers from a problem\\noriginally pointed out by Lasersohn (1989) with respect to the analysis\\noffered by Gillon (1987). The problem is shown to stem from repeated\\npluralisation of the same verbal argument and to be amenable to a\\nsimple solution in the proposed lexical analysis, which allows for\\nrestricting the pluralisations that can be inserted. The paper further\\ndevelops an account of maximalisation of pluralities as needed to\\nobtain the correct readings for sentences with quantiers that are not\\nupward monotone. Such an account is absent in the orginal system in\\n(Sternefeld, 1998). The present account makes crucial use of the\\npossibility to have distinct constituents contribute identical semantic\\nmaterial offered by LRS and employs it in an analysis of maximalisation\\nin terms of polyadic quantication.\",\"PeriodicalId\":388937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21248/hpsg.2018.6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21248/hpsg.2018.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The paper shows how the plural semantic
ideas of (Sternefeld, 1998) can be captured in Lexical Resource
Semantics, a system of underspecied semantics. It is argued that
Sternefeld's original approach, which allows for the unrestricted
insertion of pluralisation into Logical Form, suffers from a problem
originally pointed out by Lasersohn (1989) with respect to the analysis
offered by Gillon (1987). The problem is shown to stem from repeated
pluralisation of the same verbal argument and to be amenable to a
simple solution in the proposed lexical analysis, which allows for
restricting the pluralisations that can be inserted. The paper further
develops an account of maximalisation of pluralities as needed to
obtain the correct readings for sentences with quantiers that are not
upward monotone. Such an account is absent in the orginal system in
(Sternefeld, 1998). The present account makes crucial use of the
possibility to have distinct constituents contribute identical semantic
material offered by LRS and employs it in an analysis of maximalisation
in terms of polyadic quantication.