建立一个差异评估模型(Dem)以优化PEP Unnes在线研讨会系列

Supriyadi, N. Sholihin, R. M. Lia
{"title":"建立一个差异评估模型(Dem)以优化PEP Unnes在线研讨会系列","authors":"Supriyadi, N. Sholihin, R. M. Lia","doi":"10.2991/assehr.k.211125.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"---PEP UNNES has a responsibility to encourage the scientific culture and improve the quality of education in this Covid-19 pandemic era. Therefore PEP UNNES organize a series of online workshop that is open for all parties. But, to improve the quality of implementation, there must be a comprehensive evaluation. This study aimed to obtain two main things. First; Evaluate the target achievement of the PEP Unnes online workshop series. Second, provide recommendations related to the implementation of the next workshop. The approach of this study is descriptive qualitative using the basis of the Discrepancy Evaluation Model (DEM), which has five main stages. (1) Designing Criteria; (2) Program Operation; (3) Program Interim Product; (4) Program Terminal Product; (5) Program Cost-Benefit Analysis. The objects of this study were workshop participants who become members of the WhatsApp groups. According to the stage of DEM, this study concludes five points. The finding on the first stage is the lack of budget and funding strategy. The performance on the second stage is 87,5%, with 12,5% of the discrepancy. The total performance of program implantation in stage 3 is 83,4%, with the score of the discrepancy is 16,6%. The achievement of the terminal product is excellent, where 75% of the participant takes more than once, and there are 52.5% participant will remain to take the next program even they have to pay. And, the finding of the final stage is the lack of predicting the future result.","PeriodicalId":448829,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Science, Education and Technology (ISET 2020)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing a Discrepancy Evaluation Model (Dem) to Optimize PEP Unnes Online Workshop Series\",\"authors\":\"Supriyadi, N. Sholihin, R. M. Lia\",\"doi\":\"10.2991/assehr.k.211125.024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"---PEP UNNES has a responsibility to encourage the scientific culture and improve the quality of education in this Covid-19 pandemic era. Therefore PEP UNNES organize a series of online workshop that is open for all parties. But, to improve the quality of implementation, there must be a comprehensive evaluation. This study aimed to obtain two main things. First; Evaluate the target achievement of the PEP Unnes online workshop series. Second, provide recommendations related to the implementation of the next workshop. The approach of this study is descriptive qualitative using the basis of the Discrepancy Evaluation Model (DEM), which has five main stages. (1) Designing Criteria; (2) Program Operation; (3) Program Interim Product; (4) Program Terminal Product; (5) Program Cost-Benefit Analysis. The objects of this study were workshop participants who become members of the WhatsApp groups. According to the stage of DEM, this study concludes five points. The finding on the first stage is the lack of budget and funding strategy. The performance on the second stage is 87,5%, with 12,5% of the discrepancy. The total performance of program implantation in stage 3 is 83,4%, with the score of the discrepancy is 16,6%. The achievement of the terminal product is excellent, where 75% of the participant takes more than once, and there are 52.5% participant will remain to take the next program even they have to pay. And, the finding of the final stage is the lack of predicting the future result.\",\"PeriodicalId\":448829,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Science, Education and Technology (ISET 2020)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Science, Education and Technology (ISET 2020)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211125.024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Science, Education and Technology (ISET 2020)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211125.024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

——新冠肺炎疫情背景下,学校有责任弘扬科学文化,提高教育质量。因此,PEP UNNES组织了一系列对各方开放的在线研讨会。但是,要提高实施质量,必须有一个全面的评价。这项研究旨在获得两个主要的东西。第一个;评估PEP Unnes在线系列研讨会的目标实现情况。第二,提供与下一次研讨会的实施有关的建议。本研究的方法是基于差异评估模型(DEM)的描述性定性方法,该模型分为五个主要阶段。(1)设计标准;(2)程序运行;(3)项目中期产品;(4)节目终端产品;(5)项目成本效益分析。这项研究的对象是成为WhatsApp小组成员的研讨会参与者。根据DEM的阶段,本研究总结出五点。第一阶段的发现是缺乏预算和筹资战略。第二阶段的表现为87.5%,差异为12.5%。第三阶段程序植入的总绩效为83.3%,差异评分为16.6%。终端产品的成就是优秀的,75%的参与者参加了不止一次,有52.5%的参与者即使付费也会继续参加下一个项目。最后阶段的发现是缺乏对未来结果的预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Developing a Discrepancy Evaluation Model (Dem) to Optimize PEP Unnes Online Workshop Series
---PEP UNNES has a responsibility to encourage the scientific culture and improve the quality of education in this Covid-19 pandemic era. Therefore PEP UNNES organize a series of online workshop that is open for all parties. But, to improve the quality of implementation, there must be a comprehensive evaluation. This study aimed to obtain two main things. First; Evaluate the target achievement of the PEP Unnes online workshop series. Second, provide recommendations related to the implementation of the next workshop. The approach of this study is descriptive qualitative using the basis of the Discrepancy Evaluation Model (DEM), which has five main stages. (1) Designing Criteria; (2) Program Operation; (3) Program Interim Product; (4) Program Terminal Product; (5) Program Cost-Benefit Analysis. The objects of this study were workshop participants who become members of the WhatsApp groups. According to the stage of DEM, this study concludes five points. The finding on the first stage is the lack of budget and funding strategy. The performance on the second stage is 87,5%, with 12,5% of the discrepancy. The total performance of program implantation in stage 3 is 83,4%, with the score of the discrepancy is 16,6%. The achievement of the terminal product is excellent, where 75% of the participant takes more than once, and there are 52.5% participant will remain to take the next program even they have to pay. And, the finding of the final stage is the lack of predicting the future result.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信