{"title":"Penonjolan isu media arus perdana, media alternatif dan media kerajaan di laman twitter","authors":"Jamali Bujang Sanawi, Normah Mustaffa, Shahrul Nazmi Sannusi","doi":"10.22452/jpmm.vol24no2.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The change of government that took place after the GE 14 demanded a review to be carried out on the pattern of agenda setting among the news media in this country, especially on social media. Therefore, this study examines how the mainstream media, alternative media and government media set their issue’s salience agenda on Twitter during the pre and post GE 14. A total of 7,533 tweets from six media organisations namely Berita Harian, The Star, Malaysiakini, Free Malaysia Today, BERNAMA and RTM were downloaded and analysed. A content analysis, bivariate correlation analysis and time-lagged analysis were conducted to identify the hierarchical pattern of issue’s salience and the causal relationship between issue’s salience agendas between these media. From the analysis, it was found that the mainstream media, the alternative media and the government media have a different inclinations in setting up their most important issue on Twitter during the pre and post GE 14. Mainstream media were found to place sports issues as the most important issue on their agenda on Twitter, while for alternative and government media, political issues and issues of national administration and governance were their top priorities. Meanwhile, the transition of the government post GE 14 also has an impact on the causal relationship between agendas involving the mainstream media, the alternative media and the government media on Twitter. For instance, during the pre GE 14 period, the agenda of the mainstream media did not have a significant relationship with the agenda of the government media. However during the post GE 14 period, the agenda of the two media was found to have a significant relationship. In the context of the causal relationship, the two media did not have a mutual influence on each other during the pre GE 14 period, but this situation changed after the GE 14. As for the alternative media, its relationship with the government media also changed after GE 14 in which its agenda no longer influences the government’s media agenda and vice versa. During the pre GE 14 period, the two media were found to have mutually influenced each other in their agenda on Twitter. Perubahan tampuk pemerintahan yang berlaku selepas Pilihan Raya Umum ke-14 (PRU 14) menuntut agar penelitian semula dilakukan terhadap corak penentuan agenda dalam kalangan media berita di negara ini terutamanya di laman sosial. Sehubungan itu, kajian ini meneliti bagaimana media arus perdana, media alternatif dan media kerajaan mengetengahkan agenda penonjolan isu mereka di laman Twitter semasa tempoh pra dan pasca PRU 14. Sebanyak 7,533 ciapan daripada enam organisasi media yang terdiri daripada Berita Harian, The Star, Malaysiakini, Free Malaysia Today (FMT), BERNAMA dan RTM telah dimuat turun dan dianalisis. Analisis kandungan, analisis korelasi bivariat dan analisis sisih masa telah dijalankan untuk mengenalpasti corak hierarki penonjolan isu dan hubungan kausaliti agenda penonjolan isu antara media-media ini. Hasil analisis yang dijalankan mendapati bahawa media arus perdana, media alternatif dan media kerajaan mempunyai kecenderungan yang berlainan dalam menentukan isu terpenting bagi mereka di laman Twitter semasa tempoh pra dan pasca PRU 14. Media arus perdana didapati meletakkan isu sukan sebagai isu terpenting dalam agenda mereka di laman Twitter, manakala bagi media alternatif dan media kerajaan pula, isu politik dan isu pentadbiran negara dan pemerintahan menjadi keutamaan mereka. Sementara itu, peralihan kerajaan pasca PRU 14 juga turut memberi impak terhadap hubungan kausaliti antara agenda yang melibatkan media arus perdana, media alternatif dan media kerajaan di laman Twitter. Misalnya semasa tempoh pra PRU 14, agenda media arus perdana tidak mempunyai hubungan yang signifkan dengan agenda media kerajaan. Namun semasa pasca PRU 14, agenda kedua-dua media tersebut didapati mempunyai hubungan yang signifikan. Dalam konteks hubungan kausaliti pula, kedua-dua media tersebut tidak mempunyai hubungan saling mempengaruhi antara satu sama lain semasa tempoh pra PRU 14 namun keadaan ini berubah selepas PRU 14. Bagi media alternatif pula, hubungan media tersebut dengan media kerajaan juga turut berubah pasca PRU 14 yang mana agenda media tersebut tidak lagi mempengaruhi agenda media kerajaan dan begitu juga sebaliknya. Semasa tempoh pra PRU 14, kedua-dua media tersebut didapati mempunyai hubungan saling mempengaruhi antara satu sama lain dalam penentuan agenda di laman Twitter.","PeriodicalId":294201,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pengajian Media Malaysia","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Pengajian Media Malaysia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22452/jpmm.vol24no2.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
第14届全国大选后发生的政府更迭要求对该国新闻媒体,特别是社交媒体的议程设置模式进行审查。因此,本研究考察了主流媒体、另类媒体和政府媒体在第14届大选前后如何在Twitter上设置其议题的突出性议程。共有7,533条推文来自六家媒体机构,即Berita Harian, The Star, Malaysiakini, Free Malaysia Today, BERNAMA和RTM被下载和分析。通过内容分析、双变量相关分析和时间滞后分析,确定了媒体间议题突出性的层次格局以及议题突出性议程之间的因果关系。从分析中发现,主流媒体、另类媒体和政府媒体在第14届大选前后在Twitter上发布他们最重要的议题的倾向是不同的。主流媒体将体育问题列为其推特议程上最重要的问题,而对于另类媒体和政府媒体来说,政治问题和国家行政和治理问题是他们的首要任务。同时,政府职位GE 14的过渡也对Twitter上涉及主流媒体、另类媒体和政府媒体的议程之间的因果关系产生了影响。例如,在“十四大”之前,主流媒体的议程与政府媒体的议程并没有显著的关系。然而,在第14届全国大选后的时期,两家媒体的议程被发现有显著的关系。在因果关系的背景下,两种媒体在“十四大”前并不存在相互影响,但在“十四大”后这种情况发生了变化。另类媒体与政府媒体的关系在第14届大选之后也发生了变化,另类媒体的议程不再影响政府媒体的议程,反之亦然。在第14届大选之前,这两家媒体在推特上的议程上相互影响。【译文】秘鲁人在当地的生活,在当地的生活,在当地的生活,在当地的生活,在当地的生活,在当地的生活。@ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @。马来西亚日报、《星报》、《马来西亚日报》、《今日自由马来西亚》(FMT)、马来西亚新闻社和马来西亚广播电台(RTM)、马来西亚广播公司(tv)、马来西亚广播公司(tv)、马来西亚广播公司(tv)、马来西亚广播公司(tv)、马来西亚广播公司(tv)、马来西亚广播公司(tv)、马来西亚广播公司(tv)、马来西亚广播公司(tv)、马来西亚广播公司(tv)、马来西亚广播公司(tv)。分析、分析、分析、分析、分析、分析、分析、分析、分析、分析、分析、分析、分析、分析、分析、分析、分析、分析、分析、分析、分析、分析、分析、分析、分析、分析、分析、分析、分析、分析、分析、分析、分析、分析、分析、分析、分析、分析、分析、分析、分析、分析、分析、分析、分析、分析、分析、分析、分析、分析、分析、分析、分析、分析、分析、分析、分析、分析、分析、分析、分析、分析、分析、分析Hasil分析yang dijalankan mendapati bahawa media arus perdana,媒体替代yang berlainan dalam menentukan isu terpenting bagi mereka di laman Twitter semasa tempoh pra dan pasca PRU 14。媒体在Twitter,媒体在Twitter,媒体在Twitter,媒体在Twitter,媒体在Twitter,媒体在Twitter,媒体在Twitter,媒体在Twitter。Sementara itu, peralihan kerajaan pasca PRU 14 juga turut成员impak terhadap hubungan kausaliti antara议程yang melitbatkan media arus perdana,媒体替代媒体kerajaan di laman推特。14、议程媒体在中国的地位和地位,中国的地位和地位,中国的地位和地位。南华早报14日报道,中国媒体报道,中国媒体报道,中国媒体报道,中国媒体报道,中国媒体报道。Dalam konteks hubungan kausaliti pula, kedua-dua media terters .但是,Dalam konteks hubungan销售mempengaruhi antara satu samama - semasa tempoh pra PRU 14 namun keadaand ini berubah selepas PRU 14。Bagi media alternatifpula, hubungan media teresbut dungan media kerajaan juga turut berubah pasca PRU 14 yang mana agenda media teresbut tidak lagi mempengaruhi agenda media kerajaan dan begitu juga sebaliknya。14日,泰国媒体报道,泰国媒体报道,泰国媒体报道,泰国媒体报道,泰国媒体报道,泰国媒体报道,泰国媒体报道,泰国媒体报道,泰国媒体报道,泰国媒体报道,泰国媒体报道,泰国媒体报道。
Penonjolan isu media arus perdana, media alternatif dan media kerajaan di laman twitter
The change of government that took place after the GE 14 demanded a review to be carried out on the pattern of agenda setting among the news media in this country, especially on social media. Therefore, this study examines how the mainstream media, alternative media and government media set their issue’s salience agenda on Twitter during the pre and post GE 14. A total of 7,533 tweets from six media organisations namely Berita Harian, The Star, Malaysiakini, Free Malaysia Today, BERNAMA and RTM were downloaded and analysed. A content analysis, bivariate correlation analysis and time-lagged analysis were conducted to identify the hierarchical pattern of issue’s salience and the causal relationship between issue’s salience agendas between these media. From the analysis, it was found that the mainstream media, the alternative media and the government media have a different inclinations in setting up their most important issue on Twitter during the pre and post GE 14. Mainstream media were found to place sports issues as the most important issue on their agenda on Twitter, while for alternative and government media, political issues and issues of national administration and governance were their top priorities. Meanwhile, the transition of the government post GE 14 also has an impact on the causal relationship between agendas involving the mainstream media, the alternative media and the government media on Twitter. For instance, during the pre GE 14 period, the agenda of the mainstream media did not have a significant relationship with the agenda of the government media. However during the post GE 14 period, the agenda of the two media was found to have a significant relationship. In the context of the causal relationship, the two media did not have a mutual influence on each other during the pre GE 14 period, but this situation changed after the GE 14. As for the alternative media, its relationship with the government media also changed after GE 14 in which its agenda no longer influences the government’s media agenda and vice versa. During the pre GE 14 period, the two media were found to have mutually influenced each other in their agenda on Twitter. Perubahan tampuk pemerintahan yang berlaku selepas Pilihan Raya Umum ke-14 (PRU 14) menuntut agar penelitian semula dilakukan terhadap corak penentuan agenda dalam kalangan media berita di negara ini terutamanya di laman sosial. Sehubungan itu, kajian ini meneliti bagaimana media arus perdana, media alternatif dan media kerajaan mengetengahkan agenda penonjolan isu mereka di laman Twitter semasa tempoh pra dan pasca PRU 14. Sebanyak 7,533 ciapan daripada enam organisasi media yang terdiri daripada Berita Harian, The Star, Malaysiakini, Free Malaysia Today (FMT), BERNAMA dan RTM telah dimuat turun dan dianalisis. Analisis kandungan, analisis korelasi bivariat dan analisis sisih masa telah dijalankan untuk mengenalpasti corak hierarki penonjolan isu dan hubungan kausaliti agenda penonjolan isu antara media-media ini. Hasil analisis yang dijalankan mendapati bahawa media arus perdana, media alternatif dan media kerajaan mempunyai kecenderungan yang berlainan dalam menentukan isu terpenting bagi mereka di laman Twitter semasa tempoh pra dan pasca PRU 14. Media arus perdana didapati meletakkan isu sukan sebagai isu terpenting dalam agenda mereka di laman Twitter, manakala bagi media alternatif dan media kerajaan pula, isu politik dan isu pentadbiran negara dan pemerintahan menjadi keutamaan mereka. Sementara itu, peralihan kerajaan pasca PRU 14 juga turut memberi impak terhadap hubungan kausaliti antara agenda yang melibatkan media arus perdana, media alternatif dan media kerajaan di laman Twitter. Misalnya semasa tempoh pra PRU 14, agenda media arus perdana tidak mempunyai hubungan yang signifkan dengan agenda media kerajaan. Namun semasa pasca PRU 14, agenda kedua-dua media tersebut didapati mempunyai hubungan yang signifikan. Dalam konteks hubungan kausaliti pula, kedua-dua media tersebut tidak mempunyai hubungan saling mempengaruhi antara satu sama lain semasa tempoh pra PRU 14 namun keadaan ini berubah selepas PRU 14. Bagi media alternatif pula, hubungan media tersebut dengan media kerajaan juga turut berubah pasca PRU 14 yang mana agenda media tersebut tidak lagi mempengaruhi agenda media kerajaan dan begitu juga sebaliknya. Semasa tempoh pra PRU 14, kedua-dua media tersebut didapati mempunyai hubungan saling mempengaruhi antara satu sama lain dalam penentuan agenda di laman Twitter.